Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2014-6
Competitiveness through cooperation: Analysis of spatial patterns and inter-jurisdictional collaboration in the place branding of Ontario communities,Canada
Place branding is an important tool of economic development, underpinned by neoliberal policy and the processes of global competitiveness as communities at all geographic scales are becoming the primary nexus for economic development, and are forced to compete with one another for finite resources, direct investment, talent and immigrants, and tourism. Within the framework of global competition, it is often argued that communities can undertake inter-jurisdictional cooperation to enhance their competitiveness. To this end, this paper attempts to fill a gap in place branding literature by examining whether there are clusters of communities that currently have the potential to cooperate in their branding efforts. This research uses spatial autocorrelation of place brands amongst the communities of Ontario, Canada, to identify potential global patterns in branding and groups of neighbouring communities with similar brand messages. The results of this analysis show that Ontario has the potential for as many as 20 clusters in a variety of economic sectors. The existence of these clusters, therefore, provides a template for future place branding policy development within the province, allowing the participating communities an opportunity to remain relevant against global competitors.
AllenG (2007) Place branding: New tools for economic development. Design Management Review18(Spring): 60–69.
2.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and meta-governance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. European and Planning A41: 617–633.
3.
AndrewCDoloreuxD (2011) Economic Development, social inclusion and urban governance: The case of the city-region of Ottawa in Canada. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research18: 1–18.
4.
AnholtS (2005) Some important distinctions in place branding. Place Branding2(1): 116–121.
5.
AnholtS (2006) The Anholt-GMI city brands index: How the world sees the world’s cities. Place Branding2(1): 18–31.
6.
AnholtS (2010) Definitions of place branding – working towards a resolution. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy6: 1–10.
7.
ArkuG (2014) Competition and cooperation in economic development: Examining the perceptions of city officials in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Urban Affairs36(1): 99–118.
8.
Arku G and Oosterbaan C (2014) Evidence of inter-territorial collaborative economic development strategies in Ontario, Canada. GeoJournal. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-014-9554-x.
9.
BelliniN (2004) Territorial governance and area image. Symphonya: Emerging Issues in Management1: 14–26.
10.
BlakelyEJGreen LeighN (2013) Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Sage.
11.
BradshawTK (2000) Complex community development project: Collaboration, comprehensive programs, and community coalitions in complex society. Community Economic Development Journal35(2): 135–145.
12.
CaiLA (2002) Cooperative branding for rural destinations. Annals of Tourism Research29(3): 720–742.
13.
CheshirePCGordonIR (1998) Territorial competition: Some lessons for policy. Annals of Regional Science32: 321–346.
14.
Cleave E and Arku G (2014a) Community branding and brand images in Ontario, Canada: A case study. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. DOI: 10.1057/pb.2014.5.
15.
Cleave E and Arku G (2014b) Place branding and economic development at the community level in Ontario, Canada. GeoJournal. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-014-9555-9.
16.
CliffADOrdK (1970) Spatial autocorrelation: A review of existing and new measures with applications. Economic Geography46: 269–292.
17.
FlorekMInschA (2008) The trademark protection of country brands: Insights from New Zealand. Journal of Place Management and Development1(3): 292–306.
18.
GertnerDKotlerP (2004) How can a place correct a negative image?Place Branding and Public Diplomacy1(1): 50–57.
19.
GetisA (2008) A history of the concept of spatial autocorrelation: A geographer's perspective. Geographical Analysis40(3): 297–309.
20.
GoetzEGKasyerT (1993) Competition and cooperation in economic development: A study of the twin cities metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly7(1): 63–78.
21.
GordonI (1999) Internationalisation and urban competition. Urban Studies36(5–6): 1001–1016.
22.
GordonV (2007) Partners or competitors? Perceptions of regional economic development cooperation in Illinois. Economic Development Quarterly21(1): 60–78.
23.
GordonV (2009) Perceptions of regional economic development: Can win–lose become win–win?Economic Development Quarterly23(4): 317–328.
24.
Government of Ontario (2001) Municipal Act, 2001 – S.O. 2001, CHAPTER 25, Toronto, ON: Government of Ontario.
25.
HallPVSternP (2009) Reluctant rural regionalists. Journal of Rural Studies25(1): 67–76.
26.
HannaSRowleyJ (2008) An analysis of terminology use in place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy4(1): 61–75.
27.
HarveyJYoungR (2012) Image-building in Canadian Municipalities, Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
28.
HuttonT (2010) Economic change in Canadian cities: Locational dynamics of employment. In: BuntingTFilionPWalkerR (eds) Canadian Cities in Transition: New Directions in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 110–130.
29.
JacobsJ (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York, NY: Random House.
30.
KalandidesAColombC (2010) The ‘be Berlin’ campaign: Old wine in new bottles or innovative form of participatory place branding? In: AshworthGJKavaratzisM (eds) Towards Effective Place Brand Management: Branding European Cities and Regions, Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 173–191.
31.
KavaratzisM (2005) Branding: A review of trends and conceptual models. The Marketing Review5: 329–342.
32.
KavaratzisM (2009) Cities and their brands: Lessons from corporate branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy5(1): 26–37.
33.
KetterEAvrahamE (2012) The social revolution of place marketing: The growing power of users in social media campaigns. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy8(4): 285–294.
34.
KirbyAKentT (2010) The local icon: Reuse of buildings in place marketing. Journal of Town and City Management1(1): 80–81.
35.
KunzmannKR (2004) An agenda for creative governance in city regions. DISP158: 5–10.
36.
LebedenkoV (2004) Russia’s national identity and image-building. International Affairs50(4): 71–77.
37.
LemmetyinenAGoFM (2010) Building a brand identity in a network of Cruise Baltic’s destinations: A multi-authoring approach. Journal of Brand Management17: 519–531.
38.
MorinRHanleyJ (2004) Community economic development in a context of globalization and metropolization: A comparison of four North American Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(2): 369–383.
39.
NovakowskiN (2010) Ottawa: The knowledge city and a labyrinth of obstacles. GeoJournal75: 553–565.
40.
OsgoodJL (2010) A region redefined: The case of the Greater Louisville community branding project. Journal of Town and City Management1(3): 265–277.
41.
PasquinelliC (2013) Competition, cooperation and co-opetition: Unfolding the process of inter-territorial branding. Urban Research and Practice6(1): 1–18.
42.
PeckJ (2002) Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography78(3): 331–360.
43.
ReeseLASandsG (2007) Making the least of our differences? Trends in local economic development in Ontario and Michigan, 1990–2005. Canadian Public Administration50(1): 77–99.
44.
ReySJ (2001) Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis33(3): 195–214.
45.
Sadler R, Cleave E, Arku G, et al. (2014) A comparison of community place branding in Ontario, Canada and Michigan, USA. Report, The University of Western Ontario, May.
46.
SanctonA (2000) Amalgamations, service realignment, and property taxes: Did the Harris government have a plan for Ontario’s municipalities?Canadian Journal of Regional Science23(1): 135–156.
47.
SandsG (2010) Prosperity and the new economy in Canada’s major city regions. GeoJournal75: 539–552.
48.
SimonCHuigenPGrooteP (2010) Analysing regional identities in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie101(4): 409–421.
49.
SmithPJ (2008) Branding Cascadia: Considering Cascadia’s conflicting conceptualizations – Who gets to decide?Canadian Political Science Review2(2): 57–83.
50.
TassonyiA (2005) Local economic development: Theory and the Ontario experience. ITP Paper0511: 1–21.
51.
TerlouwK (2012) From thick to thin regional identities?GeoJournal77: 707–721.
52.
ToblerW (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography46(2): 234–240.
53.
TurokI (2009) The distinctive city: Pitfalls in the pursuit of differential advantage. Environment and Planning A41: 13–30.
54.
VinodraiT (2010) The dynamics of economic change in Canadian cities: Innovation, culture, and the emergence of a knowledge-based economy. In: BuntingTFilionPWalkerR (eds) Canadian Cities in Transition: New Directions in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–109.
55.
WarnabyG (2009) Towards a service-dominant place marketing logic. Marketing Theory9(4): 403–423.
56.
WolfeDAGertlerMS (2001) Globalization and economic restructuring in Ontario: From industrial heartland to learning region?European Planning Studies9(5): 575–592.
57.
WolfsonJFriskenF (2000) Local response to the global challenge: Comparing economic development policies in a regional context. Journal of Urban Affairs22: 361–384.
58.
ZimmerbauerKPaasiA (2013) When old and new regionalism collide: Deinstitutionalization of regions and resistance identity in municipality amalgamations. Journal of Rural Studies30: 31–40.
