AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A41(3): 617–633.
2.
BarcaFMcCannPRodriguez-PoseA (2012) The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus Place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science52(1): 134–152.
3.
Brenner N and Theodore N (2002) Preface: From the ‘new localism’ to the spaces of neoliberalism. Antipode 34(3): 341–347.
4.
Conservative Party (2009) Control Shift: Returning Power to Local Communities. Responsibility Agenda. Policy Green Paper No. 9, London: Conservative Central Office.
5.
FerryMBachtlerJ (2013) Reassessing the concept of policy termination: The case of regional policy in England. Policy Studies34(3): 255–273.
6.
FlindersMMoonDS (2011) The problem of letting go: The ‘Big Society’, accountable governance and ‘the curse of the decentralizing minister’. Local Economy26(8): 652–662.
7.
HM Government (2010) The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, London: Cabinet Office.
8.
HM Government (2011) Unlocking Growth in Cities, London: Cabinet Office.
9.
HM Government (2013) Growth Deals: Initial Guidance for Local Enterprise Partnerships, London: The Stationery Office.
10.
HM Treasury (2013) Spending Review 2013, London: The Stationery Office.
11.
House of Commons (2010) Pre-Budget Report 2009. Treasury Committee. Fourth Report of Session 2009–2010. HC 180, London: The Stationary Office.
12.
National Audit Office (2012) The Regional Growth Fund. HC 17 Session 2012–2013, London: The Stationary Office.
13.
OvermanHGGibbonsS (2011) Unequal Britain: How real are regional disparities?Centrepiece17(1): 23–25.
