This article explores the relationship between planning and economic growth, examining the impact of planning strategies which increasingly privilege economic growth as the key objective. Drawing from research in two contrasting English urban local authorities – one experiencing growth, the other decline, the article examines how economic growth is understood and defined locally. It also examines how a low growth context, coupled with a changing policy context is impacting on local decision making. The research finds that economic growth has become a dominant objective of local planning policy but questions the efficacy of this approach arguing that it does not necessarily address place-based challenges and may actually undermine the ability of local government to use the planning system to improve quality of life for residents.
AdamsDTiesdellS (2010) Planners as market actors: Rethinking state–market relations in land and property. Planning Theory & Practice11: 187–207.
2.
AllenJMasseyDCochraneA (1998) Rethinking the Region, New York: Routledge.
3.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2013) The evolution and trajectories of English spatial governance: Neoliberal episodes in planning. Planning Practice and Research28: 6–26.
4.
BerntM (2009) Partnerships for demolition: The goverance of urban renewal in East Germany’s shrinking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33: 754–769.
5.
Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council (2011) Blackburn with Darwen Local Development Framework, Blackburn: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council.
6.
Cambridge City Council (2006) Cambridge Local Plan, Cambridge: Cambridge City Council.
7.
Cambridge City Council (2008) Affordable Housing: Supplementary Planning Document, Cambridge: Cambridge City Council.
8.
Cambridge City Council (2012) Cambridge Local Plan: Towards 2031. Issues and Options Report, Cambridge: Cambridge City Council.
CampbellSMarshallR (2012) Utilitarianism’s bad breath. In: Fainstein SS and Campbell S (eds) Readings in Planning Theory, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
11.
ColenuttB (1997) Can town planning be for people rather than property? In: BlowersAEvansB (eds) Town Planning into the 21st Century, London and New York: Routledge.
12.
CresswellJW (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework, London: HMSO.
14.
GillhamB (2005) Research Interviewing: The Range of Techniques, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
15.
HastingsABramleyGBaileyN (2012) Serving Deprived Communities in a Recession, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
16.
HM Government (2013) Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, London: The Stationary Office.
17.
HM Treasury and BIS (2011) The Plan for Growth, London: HMSO.
18.
KumarA (2008) Capabilities, identities and justice for the urban poor. Institute of Town Planners India5: 1–20.
19.
LSE Growth Commission (2013) Investing for Prosperity: Skills, Infrastructure and Innovation. Report of the LSE Growth Commission, London: London School of Economics.
20.
MatanlePSatoY (2010) Coming soon to a city near you! Learning to live beyond growth in Japan’s shrinking regions. Social Science Japan Journal13: 187–210.
21.
MolotchH (1976) The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology82: 309–332.
NussbaumM (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
25.
ODPM (2003) Sustainable Communities Building for the Future, London: HMSO.
26.
ODPM (2006) State of the English CitiesVolume 1, London: HMSO.
27.
OwensSCowellR (2011) Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process, London and New York: Routledge.
28.
PugalisLMcguinnessD (2013) From a framework to a toolkit: Urban regeneration in an age of austerity. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal6: 339–353.
29.
PugalisLTownsendAR (2013) Rescaling of planning and its interface with economic development. Planning Practice and Research28: 104–121.
30.
SamuelsonPANordhausWD (1992) Economics: An Introductory Analysis, New York: McGraw Hill Education.
31.
Social Exclusion Unit (2001) A New Committment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy Action Report, London: HMSO.
32.
SQW (2011) Cambridge cluster at 50. The Cambridge economy retrospect and prospect. Final report to EDDA and partners, March. Cambridge: SQW.
33.
StiglerGJBeckerGS (1977) De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Association67: 76–90.
34.
StiglitzJEDriffilJ (2000) Economics, London: WW Norton and Co.
35.
WiechmannTPallagstKM (2012) Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A comparison of transformation patterns and local strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research36: 261–280.
36.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
