Developments starting with activation reforms in the 1990s and speeded up during the last 10 years form part of a double farewell to the Danish welfare model. The benefits system has been reformed with the introduction of stricter eligibility criteria, sanctions, shorter benefit periods, and strong work-first elements. The second part of the double farewell is present in recent changes in Danish corporatism. Traditionally, the inclusion of unions in the political process was a key element of the Danish model, but union influence has declined, to the extent that unions are currently better defined as lobbyists rather than as part of a corporatist system. This article outlines recent changes in the Danish model and concludes with a brief prognosis for its future.
AllernEHAylottNChristiansenFJ (2007) Social Democrats and trade unions in Scandinavia: The decline and persistence of institutional relationships. European Journal of Political Research46(5): 607–635.
2.
BogedanC (2005) Mit Sicherheit besser? Aktivierung und Flexicurity in Dänemark. ZeS-Arbeitspapier Nr 6/2005. Bremen: Zentrum für Sozialpolitik.
3.
CameronDR(1984) Social Democracy, corporatism, labor quiescence and the representation of economic interest in advanced capitalist society. In: GoldthorpeJH (ed.) Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Claredon Press, 143–178.
JørgensenH (2002) Consensus, Cooperation and Conflict: The Policy Making process in Denmark. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12.
JørgensenH (2003) the role of the trade unions in social restructuring in Scandinavia in the 1990s. Revue Française des Affaires Sociales57(4): 151–176.
JørgensenH (2009) From a beautiful swan to an ugly duckling: Changes in Danish activation policies since 2003. European Journal of Social Security11(4): 337–368.
15.
JørgensenHSchulzeM (2011) Leaving the Nordic path? The changing role of Danish trade unions in the welfare reform process. Social Policy and Administration45(2): 206–219.
16.
KauttoM (1999) Nordic Social Policy: Changing Welfare States. London, New York: Routledge.
17.
KlitgaardMBNørgaardAS(2009) Arbejdsmarkedsreformer med og uden commissioner. In: Grønnegaard ChristensenJMouritzenPENørgaardAS (eds). De store Kommissioner. Vise Mænd, Smagsdommere eller Nyttige Idioter. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag, 91–116.
18.
KlitgaardMBNørgaardAS (2010) Afmagtens mekanismer: Den danske fagbevægelse og arbejdsmarkedspolitikken siden 1960´erne. Politica42(1): 5–26.
19.
KorpiW (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge. (Original Swedish edn 1981).
20.
Larsen CA and Goul Andersen J (2008) How ideas can have an independent causal effect on policy change: The case of new economic ideas that changed the Danish welfare state. Paper for the 4th international conference on welfare state change: Policy feedback, the role of ideas, and incrementalism, Store Restrup Herregaard, Aalborg, Denmark, 30 January – 1 February 2008.
21.
LarsenF(2005) Active labour market policy in Denmark as an example of transitional labour markets and flexicurity arrangements: What can be learned? In: BredgaardTLarsenF (eds). Employment Policy from Different Angles. Copenhagen: DJØF Forlag, 115–133.
22.
LindJMøllerIH (2006) Activation for what purpose? Lessons from Denmark. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy26(1/2): 5–19.
23.
MadsenPK(2005) The Danish road to ‘flexicurity’: Where are we? And how did we get there? In: BreegardTLarsenF (eds). Employment Policy from Different Angles. Copenhagen: DJØF Forlag, 269–289.
24.
MagnussonLJørgensenHDølvikJE (2008) The Nordic Approach to Growth and Welfare – European Lessons to be Learned?. Brussels: ETUI.
25.
MailandM(2005) The involvement of social partners in active labour market policy: Do the patterns fit exceptions from regime theories? In: BreegardTLarsenF (eds). Employment Policy from Different Angles. Copenhagen: DJØF Forlag, 135–151.
26.
MartinCJThelenK (2007) The State and coordinated capitalism: Contributions of the public sector to social solidarity in postindustrial societies. World Politics60(1): 1–36.
27.
MinnichDJ (2003) Corporatism and income equality in the global economy: A panel study of 17 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research42(1): 23–53.
28.
WeishauptTJ (2011) From the Manpower Revolution to the Activation Paradigm: Explaining Institutional Continuity and Change in an Integrating Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
