This article considers what emerging localism might mean for managing local economies. It develops a simple framework to explore localism in the context of roles and relationships between the centre, local government and communities. It develops three models: ‘conditional localism’, ‘representative localism’ and ‘community localism’. It also identifies some basic characteristics that enable comparisons between each model to be made. Finally, it uses this framework to consider what implications the coalition government's localism rhetoric and legislation might have for management of the local economy.
CatneyPDixonTHennebaerryJ (2008) Hyperactive governance in the Thames Gateway. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal2(2): 124–145.
6.
Centre for Cities and Institute for Government (2011) Big Shot or Long Shot? How Elected Mayors Can Help Drive Economic Growth in England's Cities. London: Centre for Cities.
7.
ClarkeMStewartJ (2000) Community leadership: New ways of thinking. Birmingham: School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham. Occasional Paper 33.
8.
CoaffeeJ (2005) New localism and the management of regeneration. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 18(2): 108–113.
Department for Communities and Local Government (2011) A Plain English Guide to the Localism Bill: Update. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
11.
HildrethP (2007) The dynamics of ‘place-shaping’: The changing rationale for urban regeneration. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal1(3): 227–239.
12.
HildrethP (2009) Understanding ‘new regional policy’: What is behind the government's sub-national economic development and regeneration policy for England? Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal2(4): 318–336.
13.
HM Government (2010) Local Growth: Realising Every Place's Potential, Cm 7961. London: TSO.
14.
HM Government (2011) Open Public Services, Cm 8145. London: TSO.
15.
HM Treasury and Department of Trade and Industry (2001) Productivity in the UK: 3 – The Regional Dimension. London: HM Treasury.
16.
HM Treasury and Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2003) Productivity in the UK: 4 – The Local Dimension. London: HM Treasury.
17.
HM Treasury and Cabinet Office (2004) Devolving Decision Making: 1 – Delivering Better Public Services: Refining Targets and Performance Measurement. London: HM Treasury.
18.
HM Treasury, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Department for Trade and Industry (2004) Devolving Decision Making: 2 – Meeting the Regional Economic Challenge: Increasing Regional and Local Flexibility. London: HM Treasury.
19.
HM Treasury, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Department for Trade and Industry (2006) Devolving Decision Making: 3 – Meeting the Regional Economic Challenge: The Importance of Cities to Regional Growth. London: HM Treasury.
20.
HM Treasury, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and Department of Communities and Local Government (2007) Review of Sub-national Economic Development and Regeneration. London: HM Treasury.
21.
JenkinsS (2004) Big Bang Localism: A Rescue Plan for British Democracy. London: Localis and Policy Exchange.
LyonsS (2007) Lyons Inquiry into Local Government. Place-Shaping: The Shared Ambition for the Future of Local Government. London: The Stationery Office.
26.
MulganG (2006) Introduction: Local government and the case for double devolution. In: MulganGBuryF (eds). Double Devolution: The Renewal of Local Government. London: The Smith Institute.5–20.
27.
RichardsS (2001) National Audit Office. Four types of joined-up government and the problem of accountability. Joining-Up to Improve Public Services (HC383). London: TSO.61–70.
28.
WalburnD (2011) Is there a fresh chance for local authorities to take the lead in local economic development?Local Economy26(2): 75–81.
