High expectations of prompt establishment of stable parliamentary democracy in central eastern Europe (CEE) have been dashed by outbursts of populism. Such expectations were unrealistic. This paper argues that the key aspect of change in CEE involved first the mobilisation of mass protest movements and, subsequently, the `normalisation' of these movements into new regimes. These processes are unlikely to lead directly to stable parliamentary democracies. Rather, as Max Weber's analyses suggest, the normalisation of mass movements leads in the direction of `plebiscitary democracy'. The development of stable parliamentary democracy in post-communist CEE is hindered by the residues of the very mass mobilisations which initiated the process of democratic change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ASH, T.G. 1990. We the People.New York: Granta.
2.
AVTORKHANOV, A. 1966. The Communist Party Apparatus.Chicago, IL: Regnery.
3.
BANAC, I. 1993. `Post-Communism as Post-Yugoslavism: The Yugoslav Non-revolutions of 1989-90', in Banac, I. (ed.) Eastern Europe in Revolution.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 168-188.
4.
BAUMAN, Z. 1993. `A Post-modern Revolution?', in Frentzel-Zagorska, J. (ed.) From a One Party State to Democracy. Patterns of Transition in C-E Europe.Amsterdam: Rodopi Press.
CANOVAN, M. 1981. Populism.New York: Harcourt Brace.
7.
COWLEY, A.1994. `Unruly Child: The Survey of Ukraine', The Economist (7 May): 3-18.
8.
DiPALMA, G.1991. `Legitimation from the Top to Civil Society: Politico-cultural Change in Eastern Europe'.World Politics44: 49-81.
9.
ETZIONI-HALEVI, E. 1993. The Elite Connection.Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
FRENTZEL-ZAGORSKA, J.1990. `Civil Society in Poland and Hungary'.Soviet Studies42 (4): 759-777.
11.
FRENTZEL-ZAGORSKA, J. ed. 1993. From a One Party State to Democracy. Patterns of Transition in C-E Europe.Amsterdam: Rodopi Press.
12.
HIGLEY, J. and PAKULSKI, J.1992. `Revolution and Elite Transition in Eastern Europe'.Australian Journal of Political Science27 (1): 104-120.
13.
HIGLEY, J. and PAKULSKI, J. 1994. `Elite Transformation in Eastern Europe and Russia', paper presented at the 16th World Congress of the International Political Science Association (21-25 August) Berlin.
14.
HUNTINGTON, S.1991/2. `How Countries Democratize?'.Political Science Quarterly106 (4): 579-616.
15.
IONESCU, G. and GELLNER, E. eds. 1969. Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics.London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
16.
JANOS, C.A.1991. `Social Science, Communism and the Dynamics of Political Change'.World Politics44: 81-112.
17.
KITCHELT, H.1992. `The Formation of Party Systems in Eastern Central Europe'.Politics and Society20: 7-50.
18.
KURAN, T.1991. `The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989'.World Politics44: 7-48.
19.
LACLAU, E. 1977. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory.London: New Left Books.
20.
LIPSET, S.M. 1960. Political Man.London: Heinemann.
21.
MISZTAL, B.A.1992. `Must Eastern Europe Follow the Latin American Way?'.Archives Européennes Sociologiques32: 151-179.
22.
MISZTAL, B.A. 1995. `The Uses of Freedom. Postcommunist Transformation in Eastern Europe', in Epstein, B. and Flack, D. (eds) New Social Movements and Cultural Policies.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
MOTYL, A.J. 1993. Dilemmas of Independence: Ukraine After Totalitarianism.New York: Council of Foreign Relations.
24.
MULLER, K.1992. ` “Modernising” Eastern Europe: Theoretical Problems and Political Dilemmas'.Archives Européennes Sociologiques32: 109-151.
25.
PAKULSKI, J.1986. `Bureaucracy and the Soviet System'.Studies in Comparative Communism19 (1): 3-24.
26.
PAKULSKI, J.1988. `Social Movements in Comparative Perspective'.Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change10: 247-267.
27.
PAKULSKI, J. 1991. Social Movements: The Politics of Moral Protest.Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
28.
PAVKOVIC, A.1993. `Intellectuals into Politicians: Serbia 1990-92'.Meanjin52 (1): 107-116.
29.
PRZEWORSKI, A.1991. `The “East” Becomes the “South”? The “Autumn of the People” and the Future of Eastern Europe'.PS: Political Science and Politics24 (1): 20-24.
30.
SARTORI, G.1970. `Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics'.The American Political Science Review64 (4): 1033-1053.
31.
SCHMITTER, P.C. and KARL, T.L.1994. `The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists'.Slavic Review53 (1): 173-185.
32.
SHILS, E. 1956. The Torment of Secrecy.London: Heinemann.
33.
SMELSER, N. 1981. Sociology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
STANISZKIS, J.1989. `The Dynamics of Breakthrough in Eastern Europe'.Soviet Studies61: 266-283.
35.
STOKES, G. 1993. The Walls Came Tumbling Down.New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
SZTOMPKA, P. 1993. Sociology of Social Change.Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
TARROW, S.1991. ` “Aiming at the Moving Target”: Social Science and the Recent Rebellions in Eastern Europe'.PS: Political Science and Politics24 (1): 12-20.
38.
TOURAINE, A.1985. `An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements'.Social Research52 (4): 749-788.
39.
VERDERY, K. and KLIGMAN, G. 1993. `Romania after Ceausescu: Post-communist Communism?', in Banac I. (ed.) Eastern Europe in Revolution.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 117-148.
40.
WEBER, M. 1978. Economy and Society.Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
WEITMAN, S.1992. `Thinking the Revolutions of 1989'.British Journal of Sociology43 (1): 11-24.
42.
WELSH, H.A.1994. `Political Transition Process in Central and Eastern Europe'.Comparative Politics26 (4): 379-394.
