Social classes have not died, but their political significance has declined substantially; this justifies a shift from class-centred analysis towards multi-causal explanations of political behaviour and related social phenomena. This contribution extends key propositions from Clark and Lipset and adds new empirical evidence to the commentaries by Hout et al. and Pakulski.
Four general propositions are stated concerning where and why class is weaker or stronger. The propositions are then applied to several areas, considering how class has weakened in its impact, especially on politics. We cite several writers of Marxist background to show how they have converged with others in interpreting central developments. The paper notes the impact of organisations like parties and unions, independent of classes, in affecting political processes. It points to the rise of the welfare state as generally weakening class conflict by providing a safety-net and benefits. The diversification of the occupational structure toward small firms, high tech and services weakens class organisational potentials. So does more affluence. Political parties have correspondingly shifted from class conflict to non-economic issues like the environment. The Socialist and Communist Parties have drastically altered their programmes in dozens of countries, away from traditional class politics toward new social issues, and often even toward constraining government. New nationalist parties have arisen stressing national identity and limiting immigration. These developments cumulatively weaken class politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BALME, R.et al.1986/87. `New Mayors: France and the United States'.The Tocqueville Review8: 263-278.
2.
BARON, J.N.1984. `Organizational Perspectives on Stratification'.Annual Review of Sociology10: 37-69.
3.
BECK, E.M. , HORAN, P.M. and TOLBERT II, C.M.1978. `Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Differentiation'.American Sociological Review43: 704-720.
4.
BELL, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society.New York: Basic.
5.
BERGER, S. 1981. `Introduction', in Berger, S. (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics.New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BOWLES, S. and GINTIS, H. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life.New York: Basic.
7.
BOWLES, S. and GINTIS, H. 1987. Democracy and Capitalism.New York: Basic.
8.
BRINT, S. and KELLEY, S.1993. `The Social Bases of Political Beliefs in the United States'.Research in Political Sociology6: 277-317.
9.
BRINT, S. 1993. `The Social Bases of Liberalism and Dissent'. Draft manuscript prepared for volume edited by Terry Clark and Mike Rempel.
10.
BROWN, W. 1990. `Class and Industrial Relations: Sociological Bricks without Institutional Straw', in Clark, J.et al. (eds.), John Goldthorpe: Consensus and Controversy.New York: Falmer.
11.
CLARK, T.N. and FERGUSON, L.C. 1983. City Money.New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
CLARK, T.N. and LIPSET, S.M.1991. `Are Social Classes Dying?'International Sociology6(4): 397-410.
13.
COLLINS, R. 1979. The Credential Society.New York: Academic Press.
14.
CONVERSE, P.E. 1964. `The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Politics', in Apter, D.E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent.New York: Free Press.
15.
DALTON, R.J. 1988. Citizen Politics in Western Democracies: Public Opinion and Political Parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany and France.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
16.
DALTON, R.J. and KUECHLER, M. eds. 1990. Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies.New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
ESPING-ANDERSON, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
FLORA, P. 1986. Growth to Limits: The Western European Welfare State since World War II.New York: Walter de Gruyter.
19.
FRANKLIN, M.et al. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries.New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GIDDENS, A. 1980. The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies.New York: Harper and Row.
21.
GORZ, A. 1989. Critique of Economic Reason. Translated by G. Handyside and C. Turner. New York: Verso.
22.
GOULDNER, A.W. 1979. The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class.New York: Seabury.
23.
HABERMAS, J. 1975. Legitimation Crisis.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
24.
HARDIMAN, N. 1990. `Capitalism and Corporatism: The Political Economy of Advanced Capitalist Societies', in Clark, J.et al. (eds.), John Goldthorpe: Consensus and Controversy.New York: Falmer.
25.
HARVEY, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity.Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
26.
INGLEHART, R. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
INGLEHART, R. and ABRAMSON, P.R. 1993. `Economic Security and Value Change'. Unpublished draft manuscript.
28.
KITSCHELT, H. 1990. `New Social Movements and the Decline of Party Organization', in Dalton, R.J. and Kuechler, M. (eds.), Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies.New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
KRIESI, H.1989. `New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands'.American Journal of Sociology94 (5): 1078-1116.
30.
KRISTOL, I. 1978. Two Cheers for Capitalism.New York: Basic.
31.
KUECHLER, M. and DALTON, R.J. 1990. `New Social Movements and the Political Order: Inducing Change for Long-Term Stability?', in Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies.New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
LIPSET, S.M. 1981a. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
LIPSET, S.M.1981b. `What Ever Happened to the Proletariat?'Encounter56 (June): 18-34.
34.
LIPSET, S.M. 1985. Consensus and Conflict.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
35.
LIPSET, S.M. 1991. `No Third Way: A Comparative Perspective on the Left', in Chirot, D. (ed.), The Crisis of Leninism and the Decline of the Left.Seattle/London: University of Washington Press. pp. 183-232.
36.
LIPSET, S.M.1993. `Reflections on Capitalism, Commerce, Socialism, and Democracy'.Journal of Democracy4(2): 43-55.
37.
McCARTHY, J.D. and ZALD, M.N.1977. `Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory'.American Journal of Sociology82 (6): 1212-1241.
38.
NEUMAN, R.W. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
OFFE, C. 1981. `The Attribution of Public Status to Interest Groups: Observations of the West German Case', in Berger, S. (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics.New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
OFFE, C. 1985. Disorganized Capitalism: Contemporary Transformations of Work and Politics.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
OFFE, C. 1987. `Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics: Social Movements since the 1960s', in Maier, C.S. (ed.), The Changing Boundaries of the Political.New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
OLSON, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
PANITCH, L.1980. `Recent Theorizations of Corporatism: Reflections on a Growth Industry'.The British Journal of SociologyXXXI (2): 159-1987.
44.
PARKIN, F. 1979. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique.New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
PIORE, M.J. and SABEL, C.F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity.New York: Basic.
46.
POLLOCK, F. 1982. `State Capitalism', in Arato, A. and Gebhardt, E. (eds.), The Essential Frankfurt School Reader.New York: Continuum.
47.
ROEDIGGER, D. 1991. The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class.New York: Verso.
48.
SMELSER, N. 1962. A Theory of Collective Behavior.New York: Free Press.
49.
SPILLERMAN, S.1977. `Careers, Labor Market Structure, and Socioeconomic Achievement'.American Journal of Sociology83: 551-593.
50.
TILLY, C. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
51.
WEAKLIEM, D.1991. `The Two Lefts? Occupation and Party Choice in France, Italy and the Netherlands'.American Journal of Sociology96 (May): 1327-1361.
52.
WILENSKY, H.L. 1981. `Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development', in Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A.J. (eds.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
53.
WILSON, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
