This article addresses what is still an under-examined issue in social mobility literature: the role played by women in the transmission of social advantages and life chances. We include models that incorporate both progenitors for those who were born in Spain between 1926 and 1976. We selected this country due to the far-reaching transformations experienced there for the female population in recent decades in terms of fertility rates, labor market, and educational mobility. Our results show that joint models that consider the influence of both the mother’s and father’s social class more accurately predict children’s social mobility than models that only considers the father’s social class. Contrary to previous studies, we do not find a clear movement toward a more open society, but rather a gendered fluctuation. While the social fluidity of sons has remained constant over time, daughters have experienced an intense process of social fluidity.
AckerJ (1973) Women and social stratification: A case of intellectual sexism. American Journal of Sociology78(4): 936–945.
2.
AlberdiI (1999) La nueva familia española. Madrid: Taurus.
3.
BellerE (2009) Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: Why mothers matter. American Sociological Review74: 507–528.
4.
BiblarzTJGottainerG (2000) Family structure and children’s success: A comparison of widowed and divorced single-mother families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 533–548.
5.
BiblarzTJRafteryAE (1993) The effects of family disruption on social mobility. American Sociological Review58: 97–109.
6.
BiblarzTJRafteryAEBucurA (1997) Family structure and social mobility. Social Forces75: 1319–1341.
7.
BlauPMDuncanOD (1967) The American Occupational Structure. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
8.
BreenRLuijkxR (2004) Social mobility in Europe between 1970 and 2000. Social Mobility in Europe1: 37–77.
9.
BreenRLuijkxRMüllerW, et al. (2010) Nonpersistent. American Journal of Sociology114(5): 1475–1521.
10.
BreenRMüllerW (eds) (2020) Education and Intergenerational Social Mobility in Europe and the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
CarabañaJ (2000) Dos estudios de movilidad intergeneracional. Madrid: Antonio Machado.
12.
Di PreteT (1990) Adding convariates to log-linear models for the study of social mobility. American Sociological Review55(5): 757–773.
13.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJ (1992) The Constant Flux. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJPortocareroL (1979) Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European Countries: England, France & Sweden. British Journal of Sociology30: 415–441.
15.
ErolaJJalonenSLehtiH (2016) Parental education, class and income over early life course and children’s achievement. Research on Social Stratification and Mobility44: 33–43.
16.
EscribáA (2006) Estructura familiar, estatus ocupacional y movilidad social intrageneraciona. Revista Internacional de Sociología64(45): 145–170.
17.
FachelliSLópez-RoldánP (2015) Are we more mobile when the invisible half is accounted for? Analysis of intergenerational social mobility in Spain in 2011. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas150: 41–70.
18.
FeathermanDLJonesFLHauserRM (1975) Assumptions of social mobility research in the US: The case of occupational status. Social Science Research4(4): 329–360.
19.
Fernández Mellizo-SotoMMartínez GarcíaJS (2014) Increasing inequalities: Recent school failure trends in Spain. Working Paper. Universidad Carlos III / Fundación Juan March, Madrid.
20.
FlaquerL (2001) La familia como paradigma. Revista de educación325: 25–32.
21.
GanzeboomHBLuijkxR (1989) Intergenerational class mobility in comparative perspective. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility8: 3–84.
22.
GanzeboomHBTreimanDJUlteeWC (1991) Comparative intergenerational stratification research: Three generations and beyond. Annual Review of sociology277–302.
23.
GarnseyE (1978) Women’s work and theories of class stratification. Sociology12(2): 223–243.
24.
GehringerAKlasenS (2016) Labor force participation of women in the EU–What role do family policies play?Labour31(1): 15–42.
25.
Gil-HernándezCJMarqués-PeralesIFachelliS (2017) Intergenerational social mobility in Spain between 1956 and 2011: The role of educational expansion and economic modernisation in a late industrialised country. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility51: 14–27.
Jurado GuerreroTNaldiniM (1996) Is the south so different? Italian and Spanish families in comparative perspective. Working Paper. MZES, AB 1/: 12.
33.
KoruppSEGanzeboomHBVan der LippeT (2002) Do mothers matter. A comparison of models of the influence of mothers’ and fathers’ educational and 31 occupational status on children’s educational attainment. Quality & Quantity36(1): 17–42.
López-RoldánPFachelliS (2022) The influence of education and work experience on social mobility: A study of the cohorts born in Spain between 1926 and 1981. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS)179: 79–123.
36.
Marqués-PeralesIHerrera-UsagreM (2010) ¿Somos más móviles? Nuevas evidencias sobre la movilidad intergeneracional de clase en España en la segunda mitad del siglo XX. Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas (ed. en español)131: 43–73.
37.
Meil LandwerlinG (1999) La postmodernización de la familia española. Madrid: Acento Editorial.
38.
MeravigliaCGanzeboomHB (2008) Mothers’ and fathers’ influence on occupational status attainment in Italy. POLENA [Political and Electoral Navigations]2: 29–65.
39.
MurdockGP (1949) Social Structure. New York: The MacMillan Company.
40.
OeschD (2006) Redrawing the Class Map: Institutions and Stratification in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
OlivettiC (2013) The female labor force and long-run development: The American experience in comparative perspective. No. w19131. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
42.
ParsonsTBalesR (1956) Family Socialization and Interaction Process. New York: Free Press.
43.
PayneGAbbottP (1990) The Social Mobility of Women. beyond Male Mobility Models. Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.
44.
PisatiMSchizzerottoABreenR (2004) The Italian mobility regime: 1985-97. In: BreenR (ed.) Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.149–175.
45.
RodríguezJJGMedinaLJG (2005) Mercado de trabajo, ocupación y clases sociales. In: GonzalezJJRequenaM (eds) Tres décadas de cambio social en España. Madrid: Alianza, pp.89–134.
46.
SørensenA (1994) Women, family and class. Annual Review of Sociology20: 27–47.
47.
SalidoO (2001) La movilidad ocupacional de las mujeres en España. Por una sociología de la movilidad femenina. Madrid: CIS.
48.
SchizzerottoAMarzadroS (2008) Social mobility in Italy since de beginning of the twentieth century. Rivista Di Politica Economica98(5): 5–40.
SolísPBoadoM (2016) Y sin embargo se mueve: estratificación y movilidad intergeneracional de clase en América Latina. Mexico City, Mexico: Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias.
51.
StanworthM (1984) Women and class analysis: A reply to John Goldthorpe. Sociology18(2): 159–170.
52.
SteelmanLCPowellBWerumR, et al. (2002) Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration: Recent advances and challenges. Annual Review of Sociology28: 247–270.
53.
WestoffCFPotvinRH (2015) College Women and Fertility Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
WillekensMLievensJ (2014) Family (and) culture: The effect of cultural capital within the family on the cultural participation of adolescents. Poetics42: 98–113.
55.
WongRS (1994) Model selection strategies and the use of association models to detect group differences, sociological. Methods and Research22: 460–491.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
