Two of the largest democracies in the global south – India and Brazil – have witnessed a dramatic turn to right-wing populism. Careful historical comparison reveals that the form of reaction is markedly different from other recent cases of democratic backsliding. In both cases, reaction has been driven by elites in response to a previous expansion of democratic rights and social inclusion. This form of retrenchment populism is rooted in very similar class realignments that are configured both by economic and socio-cultural interests. Globalization has played a role, but not through the conventionally identified pathways of neoliberalism or modernization. Instead, reaction has been driven by an expanded middle class’s efforts to hoard opportunity and public resources and preserve traditional status privileges.
AiyarY (2019) In defense of Indian secularism. The Hindustan Times, 18December.
2.
BaiocchiGHellerPSilvaM (2011) Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
CastellsM (1997) The Power of Identity. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
ChackoP (2019) Marketizing Hindutva: The state, society, and markets in Hindu nationalism. Modern Asian Studies53(2): 377–410.
6.
ChiriyankandathJMaioranoDManorJTillinL (2020) The Politics of Poverty Reduction in India: The UPA Government, 2004 to 2014. Hyderabad: Orient Black Swan.
7.
CorbridgeSHarrissJ (2000) Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu Nationalism and Popular Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
DagninoE (1998) Culture, citizenship, and democracy: Changing discourses and practices of the Latin American left. In: AlvarezSEDagninoEEscobarA (eds) Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 33–63.
9.
de Sousa SantosBRodríguez-GaravitoCA (eds) (2005) Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Du BoisWEB (1935) Black Reconstruction in America 1860–1880. New York: The Free Press.
11.
EvansP (2008) Is an alternative globalization possible?Politics and Society36(2): 271–305.
12.
EvansP (2020) Transnational social movements. In: JanoskiTDe LeonCMisraJMartinIW (eds) The New Handbook of Political Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1053–1077.
FernandesLHellerP (2006) Hegemonic aspirations: New middle class politics and India’s democracy in comparative perspective. Critical Asian Studies38(4): 495–522.
15.
FrankelFRRaoMSA (1989) Dominance and State Power in Modern India: Decline of a Social Order, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
GarridoM (forthcoming) Democratic disenchantment and middle-class support for Rodrigo Duterte. International Sociology.
17.
GethinAMorganM (2018). Brazil divided: Hindsights on the growing polarisation of inequality. World Inequality Lab Issue Brief 2018/3.
18.
GramsciA (1971) Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
19.
HabermasJ (2001) The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
HallS (1985) Authoritarian populism: A reply to Jessop et al. New Left ReviewMay–June: 115–124.
JaffrelotC (2003) India’s Silent Revolution: The Rise of the Lower Castes in North India. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
JaffrelotC (2019) L’Inde de Modi: National-populisme et democratie ethnique. Paris: Payard/CERI.
29.
JenkinsRManorJ (2017) Politics and the Right to Work: India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
KaurR (2014) The ‘emerging’ middle class: Role in the 2014 general elections. Economic and Political Weekly49(26/27): 15–19.
31.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
LeroC (2019) Right-wing Authoritarian Populist Presidents in the Philippines and Brazil as an Expression of New Middle Class Frustration. Sao Paulo: Centro Estudoes de Metropole, University of Sao Paulo.
33.
LevitskySZiblattD (2018) How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.
34.
ManderH (2018) India’s equivocal engagement with transnational advocacy. In: EvansPRodríguez-GaravitoC (eds) Transnational Advocacy Networks: Reflecting on 15 Years of Evolving Theory and Practice. Bogota: Dejusticia, pp. 172–185.
35.
PaschelTS (2016) Becoming Black Political Subjects: Movements and Ethno-Racial Rights in Colombia and Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
PrzeworskiA (2019) Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
RobertsKM (2007) Latin America’s populist revival. SAIS Review of International Affairs27(1): 3–15.
38.
Rodríguez-GaravitoCGomezK (2018) Rising to the Populist Challenge: A New Playbook for Human Rights Actors. Bogota: Dejusticia.
39.
RodrikD (2018) Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy1(1–2): 12–33.
40.
RoychowdhuryP (2020) Capable Women, Incapable States: Negotiating Violence and Rights in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Saad-FilhoABoffoM (2020) The corruption of democracy: Corruption scandals, class alliances, and political authoritarianism in Brazil. Geoforum. Epub ahead of print 27 February 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.003
42.
SikkinkK (2017) Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
SkidmoreTE (1967) Politics in Brazil, 1930–1964: An Experiment in Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
ThachilT (2014) Elite Parties, Poor Voters: How Social Services Win Votes in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
TillyC (1998) Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47.
VarshneyA (2019) Modi consolidates power: Electoral vibrancy, liberal deficits. Journal of Democracy30(4): 67–77.
48.
VeeraraghavanR (2017) Strategies for synergy in a high modernist project: Two community responses to India’s NREGA rural work program. World Development99: 203–213.
49.
VithayathilT (2018) Counting caste: Censuses, politics, and castelessness in India. Politics and Society46(4): 455–484.
50.
WeylandK (1996) Neopopulism and neoliberalism in the Latin America. Studies in Comparative and International Development31: 3–31.
51.
WeylandK (2001) Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics34(1): 1–22.
52.
YadavY (2000) Understanding the second democratic upsurge. In: FrankelF (ed.) Transforming India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 120–145.
