This review essay addresses one of the most widely used terms in contemporary social science debates: neoliberalism. The term has been engaged increasingly to depict the uncertainties of our contemporary era, from the global political economy to our everyday lives. Despite this widespread usage, though, it lacks any generally accepted interpretation or meaning. These two edited collections provide opportunities to explore the complex and diverse theories, policies and settings within which neoliberalism has assumed its multiple forms. The essay evaluates how the recognition of complexity and diversity within neoliberalism and its interpretations might help us to achieve greater clarity and mutual comprehension.
BabbSKentikelenisA (2018) International financial institutions as agents of neoliberalism. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 16–27.
2.
BairdCW (2007) Hayek on labor unions: Coercion and the rule of law. Journal of Private Enterprise23(1): 30–51.
3.
BarkanJ (2018) Corporate power and neoliberalism. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 446–456.
4.
BruffI (2016) Neoliberalism and authoritarianism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 107–117.
5.
CahillDCooperMKoningsMPrimroseD (2018) Introduction: Approaches to neoliberalism. In: Cahill, et al., pp. xxv–xxxiii.
6.
CarrollWKSapinskiJP (2016) Neoliberalism and the transnational capitalist class. In: Springer, et al., pp. 39–49.
7.
ChorevN (2018) Neoliberalism and supra-national institutions. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 260–269.
8.
CollardR-CDempseyJRoweJ (2016) Re-regulating socioecologies under neoliberalism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 469–479.
9.
DadosNConnellR (2018) Neoliberalism in world perspective: Southern origins and Southern dynamics. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 28–39.
10.
DardotPLavalC (2018) Foucault, neoliberalism and Europe. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 193–200.
11.
DavidsonN (2018) Neoliberalism as a class-based project. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 55–68.
12.
DeanM (2018) Foucault and the neoliberalism controversy. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 40–54.
13.
Eagleton-PierceM (2016) Historicizing the neoliberal spirit of capitalism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 17–26.
14.
EnglandKWardK (2016) Theorizing neoliberalization. In: Springer, et al., pp. 50–60.
15.
FarrantAMcPhailEBergerS (2012) Preventing the ‘abuses’ of democracy: Hayek, the ‘military usurper’ and transitional dictatorship in Chile?American Journal of Economics and Sociology71(3): 513–538.
16.
FeldmanAJ (2019) Power, labour power and productive force in Foucault’s reading ofCapital. Philosophy and Social Criticism45(3): 307–333.
17.
HayekFA (1980) 1980s Unemployment and the Unions: The Distortion of Relative Prices by Monopoly in the Labour Market. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
18.
IszóJ (2019) Foucault, Simon Springer, and postneoliberalism. Review of Radical Political Economics51(1): 147–157.
19.
JacksonB (2016) Neoliberalism, labour and trade unionism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 262–270.
20.
KeilR (2016) Urban neoliberalism: Rolling with the changes in a globalizing world. In: Springer, et al., pp. 385–397.
21.
KierseyN (2016) Neoliberalism and the biopolitical imagination. In: Springer, et al., pp. 164–174.
22.
KotzDM (2018) Neoliberalism, inequality, and capital accumulation. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 427–445.
23.
LewisN (2016) Governmentality at work in shaping a critical geographical politics. In: Springer, et al., pp. 73–83.
24.
LindM (2014) Why big business fears the Tea Party. Politico Magazine, 15June.
25.
MacrineSL (2016) Pedagogies of neoliberalism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 308–319.
26.
Nik-KhanEVan HornR (2016) The ascendancy of Chicago neoliberalism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 27–38.
27.
O’NeillPWellerS (2016) Neoliberalism in question. In: Springer, et al., pp. 84–92.
28.
PeckJ (2018) Preface: Naming neoliberalism. In: Cahill, et al., pp. xxii–xxiv.
29.
PetersMAJandrićP (2018) Neoliberalism and the university. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 553–564.
30.
PhelanS (2018) Neoliberalism and media. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 539–552.
31.
PlewheD (2016) Neoliberal hegemony. In: Springer, et al., pp. 61–72.
32.
PlewheD (2018) Neoliberal thought collectives: Integrating social science and intellectual history. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 85–97.
33.
PrinceR (2016) Neoliberalism everywhere: Mobile neoliberal policy. In: Springer, et al., pp. 331–339.
34.
RieterHSchmolzM (1993) The ideas of German ordoliberalism 1938–45: Pointing the way to a new economic order. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought1(1): 87–114.
35.
RodriguesJ (2018) Embedding neoliberalism: The theoretical practices of Hayek. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 129–142.
36.
RynerM (2018) Neoliberalization of European social democracy: Transmissions and dispositions. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 248–259.
37.
SpringerS (2015) Postneoliberalism?Review of Radical Political Economics47(1): 5–17.
38.
SpringerS (2016) The violence of neoliberalism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 153–163.
39.
SpringerSBirchKMacLeavyJ (2016) An introduction to neoliberalism. In: Springer, et al., pp. 1–14.
40.
Van HornRNik-KhanE (2018) Planning the ‘free’ market: The genesis and rise of Chicago neoliberalism. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 98–112.
41.
WeberIM (2018) China and neoliberalism: Moving beyond the China is/is not neoliberal dichotomy. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 219–233.
42.
YoungB (2018) Contemporary Anglo-Saxon neoliberalism is not German ordoliberalism. In: Cahill, et al., pp. 179–189.
