The politicisation of gender and restrictive laws about women in Muslim countries have often been explained in terms of the ubiquity of Islam in politics and culture. This paper offers an alternative explanation, one focused on the dynamics of patriarchy and the contradictions of development and social change. Patriarchy is defined here as a kinship-ordered social structure with strictly defined sex roles in which women are subordinated to men. Patriarchy persists where there is limited industrialisation, urbanisation and proletarianisation, and may be legislated by the state. At the same time, the collision of tradition and modernity and unwanted changes, particularly in the status of women, may result in a preoccupation with cultural identity on the part of some social groups. In such a context, calls may be made and measures taken to restore women to their `proper place'. This framework is used to analyse the politics of gender in Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan during the 1980s. The difference in the three cases is that the Afghan state sought to undermine patriarchal structures through land reform and changes in marriage and family law, whereas in Iran and Pakistan the states fostered patriarchal ideology and practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AGARWAL, B. 1988. `Patriarchy and the “Modernising” State', in Agarwal, B. (ed.), Structures of Patriarchy: The State, the Community and the Household.London: Zed Press.
2.
ANWAR, R. 1988. The Tragedy of Afghanistan.London: Verso.
3.
CAIN, M. 1988. `The Material Consequences of Reproductive Failure in Rural South Asia', in Dwyer, D. and Bruce, J. (eds.), A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. pp. 20-38.
4.
CALDWELL, J. 1982. Theory of Fertility Decline.London/New York: Academic Press.
5.
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1979 1980. Translated by Hamid Algar. Berkeley, CA: Mizan Press.
6.
DE LAURETIS, T. 1987. Technologies of Gender.Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
7.
DUPREE, N.H. 1984. `Revolutionary Rhetoric and Afghan Women', in Shahrani, N. and Canfield, R., Revolutions and Rebellions in Afghanistan: Anthropological Perspectives.Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.
8.
ENGELS, F. 1972 [1884]. Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State.New York: International Publishers.
9.
GAILEY, C.W. 1987. `Evolutionary Perspectives on Gender Hierarchy', in Hess, B. and Marx Feree, M. (eds.), Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
GHOUSSOUB, M.1987. `Feminism - or the Eternal Masculine - in the Arab World'.New Left Review161 (January-February).
11.
HABIB, M. 1984. `Women - A Fractured Profile', in Morgan, R. (ed.), Sisterhood is Global.New York: Anchor Books.
12.
HIGGINS, P. and SHOAR-GHAFFARI, P. 1989. `Sex Role Socialization in Iranian Textbooks'.Departments of Anthropology and Communications, SUNNY-Plattsburgh.
13.
HIRST, D.1990. `The Politics of Armaggedon'.The Guardian, 19April: 3.
14.
IMAM, A. 1990. `Women Should Neither Be Seen Nor Heard? Identity Politics and Women's Mobilisation in Kano, Northern Nigeria'. Paper presented at the Round Table on Identity Politics and Women, UNU/WIDER, 8-10 October.
15.
JAYAWARDENA, K. 1986. Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World.London: Zed Books.
16.
KABEER, N.1988. `Subordination and Struggle: Women in Bangladesh'.New Left Review168 (March-April).
17.
KANDIYOTI, D.1988. `Bargaining with Patriarchy'.Gender and Society2 (3).
18.
KATSIKAS, S.J. 1982. The Arc of Socialist Revolutions: Angola to Afghanistan.Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co.
19.
KEDDIE, N. 1988. `Ideology, Society and the State in Post-Colonial Muslim Societies', in Halliday, F. and Alavi, H. (eds.), The State and Ideology in the Middle East and Pakistan.New York: Monthly Review Press.
20.
KEDDIE, N.1989. `The Past and Present of Women in the Muslim World'.Journal of World History1 (1).
21.
KRUKS, S. , RAPP, R. and YOUNG, M. 1989. Promissory Notes: Women in the Transition to Socialism.New York: Monthly Review Press.
22.
LERNER, G. 1986. The Creation of Patriarchy.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
LEVINE, D. ed. 1984. Proletarianization and Family History.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24.
MANN, M. 1986. `A Crisis in Stratification Theory? Persons, Households/Families/Lineages, Genders, Classes, and Nations', in Crompton, R. and Mann, M. (eds.), Gender and Stratification.London: Polity Press.
25.
MASSELL, G. 1974. The Surrogate Proletariat.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
MERNISSI, F. 1987. Beyond the Veil: Male-Female Dynamics in a Modern Muslim Society.Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
27.
McDONALD, P. 1985. `Social Organization and Nuptiality in Developing Societies', in Cleland, J. and Hobcraft, J. (eds.), Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
MOGHADAM, V.1987. `Socialism or Anti-Imperialism? The Left and Revolution in Iran'.New Left Review166 (November-December).
29.
MOGHADAM, V.1988. `Women, Work and Ideology in the Islamic Republic'.International Journal of Middle East Studies20 (2).
30.
MOGHADAM, V.1989. `Revolution, the State, Islam and Women: Sexual Politics in Iran and Afghanistan'.Social Text22 (Spring).
31.
MOGHADAM, V. 1990a. `Revolution, Culture and Gender: Notes on The Woman Question in Revolutions'. Paper presented at the XIIth World Congress of Sociology, July; Madrid, Spain.
32.
MOGHADAM, V. 1990b. `Gender and Restructuring Perestroika, the 1989 Revolutions, and Women'.UNU/WIDERWorking Paper No. 87 (November).
33.
MOGHADAM, V.1991. `The Reproduction of Gender Inequality in Muslim Societies: The Case of Iran during the 1980s'.World Development19 (10), October.
34.
MOLYNEUX, M.1982. `Socialist Societies Old and New: Progress toward Women's Emancipation?'.Monthly Review34 (3).
35.
MOLYNEUX, M.1990. `The Woman Question in the Age of Perestroika'.New Left Review183 (September-October).
36.
MOORE, B. 1966. Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship.Boston: Beacon Press.
37.
MUMTAZ, K. and SHAHEED, F. 1987. Women of Pakistan: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back.London: Zed Press.
38.
MUSTAFA, Z. n.d. `Women's Education in Pakistan'. Mimeo. DAWN.
39.
NAJMABADI, A. 1989. `Power, Morality, and the New Muslim Womanhood'. Paper presented at the MIT Seminar on `The State and Restructuring of Society in Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan', Cambridge, Mass., 20 March.
40.
NYROP, R.F. and SEEKINS, D.M. eds. 1986. Afghanistan: A Country Study.Washington, DC: The American University, Foreign Area Studies.
41.
PAPANEK, H. 1989a. `Socialization for Inequality: Entitlements, the Value of Women, and Domestic Hierarchies'.Boston: Center for Asian Development Studies, Boston University.
42.
PAPANEK, H. 1989b. `Why Do Regimes Raise The Woman Question even if it Creates so much Trouble?' Paper presented at the MIT Seminar on `The State and Restructuring of Society in Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan', Cambridge, Mass., 20 March.
43.
RUBIN, G. 1975. `The Traffic in Women: Notes on a Political Economy of Sex', in Reiter, R.R. (ed.), Toward an Anthropology of Women.New York: Monthly Review Press.
44.
SABBAH, F. 1984. Woman in the Muslim Unconscious. Translated by Mary Jo Lakeland. New York: Pergamon Press.
45.
SANATKAR, F.1987. `Feminism and Women Intellectuals'.Nazm-e Novin8 (Summer). (In Persian)
46.
SEN, A. and SENGUPTA, S.1983. `Malnutrition of Rural Children and the Sex Bias'.Economic and Political Weekly18: 855-863.
47.
SHANIN, T. 1987. `A Peasant Household: Russia at the Turn of the Century', in Shanin, T. (ed.), Peasants and Peasant Societies.London: Basil Blackwell.
48.
SHARABI, H. 1988. Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in the Arab World.New York/London: Oxford University Press.
49.
STACEY, J. 1984. Patriarchy and Socialist Revolution in China.Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
TAPPER, N. 1984. `The Implications of the Abolition of Brideprice', in Shahrani, N. and Canfield, R. (eds.), Revolutions and Rebellions in Afganistan: Anthropological Perspectives.Berkeley: University of California Press, Institute of International Studies.
51.
TILLION, G. 1983. The Republic of Cousins. Translated by Quentin Hoare. London: al-Saqi.
52.
TOHIDI, N. 1989. `Gender and the Islamic Revolution'. Paper presented at the conference of the Center for Iranian Research and Analysis, Columbia University, New York (April 7).
53.
TOHIDI, N. 1990. `Fundamentalism and The Woman Question in Iran'. Paper presented at the Round Table on `Identity Politics and Women', UNU/WIDER, Helsinki, 8-10 October.
WEISS, A. 1989. `The Consequence of State Policy for Women in Pakistan'. Paper presented at the MIT Seminar on `The State and Restructuring of Society in Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan', Cambridge, 20 March.
56.
WOOD, E.M.1988. `Capitalism and Human Emancipation'.New Left Review167 (January-February).
57.
YUVAL-DAVIS, N. and ANTHIAS, F. eds. 1989. Woman-Nation-State.London: Macmillan.
