Discussions about addressing gender-based violence in cities often evoke the notion of ‘safety’ of women on the streets but fail to recognize that violence spans the private and public spheres. Situated within the broader scholarship on gender and urban spaces, this exploratory study relies on a mapping exercise of a purposive sample of stakeholders and 87 informal interviews in Bengaluru, India, to discuss the strategies they adopt for addressing violence. Stakeholders’ responses are fragmented and many services are reactiive rather than about prevention of violence. The authors attribute the lack of emphasis on prevention to scarce resources and expertise which results in agencies prioritizing working with survivors. Such prioritization reflects an international gap in thinking about the possibility of preventing violence before it occurs. The authors suggest there be concerted efforts by a consortium of agencies to develop preventive services and to ensure accountability for implementation, provision of resources for interventions, and evaluation of interventions.
AbrahamMTastsoglouE (2016) Interrogating gender, violence, and the state in national and transnational contexts: Framing the issues. Current Sociology64(4): 517–534.
2.
AndrewC (2000) Resisting boundaries? Using safety audits for women. In: MiranneKYoungA (eds) Gendering the City: Women, Boundaries and Visions of Urban Life. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 157–168.
3.
BergBL (2009) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 7th edn.Boston: Pearson.
4.
BreidingMJBasileKCSmithSG. (2015) Intimate Partner Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data Elements: Version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
5.
ChaudhuriSKrishnanPSubramaniamM (n.d.) Mainstreaming gender, endangered, ungendered? Analysis of media reports of 2012 case of rape in India. In: 2015 ASA Conference.
6.
EnjeuCSaveJ (1974) The city: Off-limits to women. Liberation (July/August): 9–13.
7.
ErtürkYPurkayasthaB (2012) Linking research, policy and action: A look at the work of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women. Current Sociology60(2): 142–160.
8.
FerreeMM (1990) Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family52(4): 866–884.
9.
FerreeMMSubramaniamM (2001) The international women’s movement at century’s end. In: VannoyD (ed.) Gender Mosaics: Social Perspectives. Los Angeles: Roxbury Press, pp. 496–506.
10.
GordonLRigerS (1989) The Female Fear. New York: Free Press.
11.
HeyzerN (1998) Working towards a world free from violence against women: UNIFEM’s contribution. Gender and Development6(3): 17–26.
International Center for Research on Women Asia Regional Office (2012) Safe Cities Free from Violence against Women and Girls. New Delhi.
15.
KapurA (1998) ‘I am witness to…’: A profile of Sakshi Violence Intervention Centre in New Delhi, India. Gender and Development6(3): 42–47.
16.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
KrishnanPSubramaniamM (2015) Domestic violence and intra-family dynamics: Analysis of India’s Supreme Court rulings. Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research9: 45–72.
18.
KrugEGLDahlbergJAMercyAB. (2002) World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
19.
KumarR (1993) The History of Doing: An Illustrated Account of Movements for Women’s Rights and Feminism in India, 1800–1990. New Delhi: Kali for Women
20.
MoghadamVM (2005) Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau) (2013) Crime in India 2013. Ministry of Home Affairs. Available at: http://ncrb.gov.in/CD-CII2013/home.asp (accessed 3 May 2015).
22.
OcTTiesdallS (1997) Safer City Centres: Reviving the Public Realm. London: Paul Chapman.
23.
PainR (2001) Gender, race, age and fear in the city. Urban Studies38: 899–913.
24.
PhadkeS (2013a) Unfriendly bodies, hostile cities: Reflections on loitering and gendered public space. Economic and Political WeeklyXLVIII(39): 50–59.
25.
PhadkeS (2013b) Traversing the city: Some gendered questions of access in Mumbai. In: PereraNTangW-S (eds) Transforming Asian Cities: Intellectual Impasse, Asianizing Space, and Emerging Translocalities. New York: Routledge, pp. 177–189.
26.
PhadkeSRanadeSKhanS (2009) Why loiter? Radical possibilities for gendered dissent. In: ButcherMVelayuthumS (eds) Dissent and Cultural Resistance in Asia’s Cities. New York: Routledge, pp. 185–203.
27.
PhadkeSRanadeSKhanS (2011) Why Loiter? Women and Risk on Mumbai Streets. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
28.
PhadkeSRanadeSKhanS (2013) Invisible Women. Index on Censorship 42: 40. Special Report. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
29.
PurkayasthaBSubramaniamMDesaiMBoseS (2003) The study of gender in India: A partial review. Gender and Society17(4): 503–524.
30.
Reactor (2012) Scoping Study on Gender Based Violence and Discrimination against Women and Girls in Urban Public Spaces of the City of Skopje. Report of a Project Supported by UN Women and Implemented by Reactor – Research in Action and Strategic Development Consulting.
31.
RismanB (2004) Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with social change. Gender and Society18(4): 429–450.
32.
RubinHJRubinIS (2012) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
SandbergLRönnblomM (2015) ‘I don’t think we’ll ever be finished with this’: Fear and safety in policy and practice. Urban Studies52(14): 2664–2679.
34.
SassenS (2004) Local actors in global politics. Current Sociology52(4): 649–670.
35.
ScratonSWatsonB (1998) Gendered cities: women and public leisure space in the ‘postmodern city’. Leisure Studies17: 123–137.
36.
SenP (1998) Development practice and violence against women. Gender and Development6(3): 7–16.
37.
SmaounS (2000) Violence against women in urban areas: An analysis of the problem from a gender perspective. WP 17, United Nations Urban Management Program, Nairobi.
38.
StaeheliL (1996) Publicity, privacy, and women’s political action. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14: 601–619.
39.
StarkE (2007) Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
StorerHLCaseyEACarlsonJ. (2016) Primary prevention is? A global perspective on how organizations engaging men in preventing gender-based violence conceptualize and operationalize their work. Violence Against Women22(2): 249–268.
41.
SubramaniamM (2006) The Power of Women’s Organizing: Gender, Caste, and Class in India. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
42.
SubramaniamM (2007) NGOs and resources in the construction of intellectual realms: Cases from India. Critical Sociology33(3): 551–573.
43.
SubramaniamM (2014) Resisting gendered religious nationalism: The case of religious based violence in Gujarat, India. In: Texler SegalMDemosV (eds) Advances in Gender Research: Gendered Perspectives on Conflict and Violence, Vol.18 (part b). Bingley: Emerald, pp. 73–98.
44.
SubramaniamMKrishnanP (2016) Stranded between the law, family, and society: Women in domestic violence and rulings of India’s Supreme Court. Current Sociology64(4): 603–619.
45.
Swasti (2013) Safe city proposal. Unpublished.
46.
ValentineG (1989) The geography of women’s fear. Area21: 385–390.
47.
ValentineG (1991) Women’s fear and the design of public space. Built Environment18: 288–303.
48.
ValentineG (1992) Images of danger: Women’s sources of information about the spatial distribution of violence. Area24: 22–29.
49.
WalbyS (2013) Violence and society: Introduction to an emerging field of sociology. Current Sociology61(2): 95–111.
50.
WekerleGWhitzmanC (1995) Safer Cities: Guidelines for Planning, Design, and Management. New York: Routledge.
51.
WhitzmanC (2002) Feminist activism for safer social space in High Park, Toronto: How women got lost in the woods. Canadian Journal of Urban Research11(2): 47–67.
52.
WorpoleK (1992) Towns for People: Transforming Urban Life. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
53.
YllöKA (2005) Through a feminist lens: Gender, diversity, and violence: Extending the feminist framework. In: LosekeDGellesRJCavanaughM (eds) Current Controversies on Family Violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 19–34.
