This article focuses on the borderland of Thailand with Myanmar and analyzes how Burmese women migrant workers are both victimized – Agamben’s homo sacer – by the exceptional space of the borderland, but also are able to actively utilize the opportunities afforded by the particular space of the border to juggle their responsibilities and life options. The article focuses on how women migrant workers arrange their healthcare, childcare and children’s education at the borderland of Mae Sot and in the centerland of Bangkok, and analyzes how they use the opportunities available at the border to manage these tasks. At the same time, the borderland leaves women with very weak protection against violence, cut off from their communities of origin, which offer both protection and control. Although borderlands can provide space for alternatives, this exceptional space compounded with a strict gender regime can pose serious restrictions on women’s agency.
AgambenG (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AgambenG (2005) State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AIT (Asian Institute of Technology) and Mahidol University (2014) Policy brief: Migrant children’s education. Toyota Foundation, September.
4.
AnzalduaG (1987) Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
5.
AungSL (2014) The friction of cartography: On the politics of space and mobility among migrant communities in the Thai–Burma borderlands. Journal of Borderlands Studies29(1): 27–45.
6.
BastiaT (2011) Migration as protest? Negotiating gender, class, and ethnicity in urban Bolivia. Environment and Planning A43(7): 1514–1529.
7.
CastlesSDavidsonA (2000) Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. New York: Routledge.
8.
CheaterAP (1998) Transcending the state? Gender and borderline constructions of citizenships in Zimbabwe. In: WilsonTMDonnanH (eds) Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–214.
9.
CunninghamHHeymanJ (2004) Introduction: Mobilities and enclosures at borders. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power11(3): 289–302.
10.
DanneckerP (2005) Transnational migration and the transformation of gender relations: The case of Bangladeshi labour migrants. Current Sociology53(4): 655–674.
11.
DonnanHWilsonTM (1999) Borders: Frontiers of Identity, Nation and State. Oxford: Berg.
12.
HarridenJ (2012) The Authority of Influence: Women and Power in Burmese History. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
13.
HorstmannAWadleyRL (eds) (2006) Centering the Margin: Agency and Narrative in Southeast Asian Borderlands. New York: Berghahn.
14.
IsinERygielK (2007) Of other global cities: Frontiers, zones, camps. In: DrieskensBFranckMHeikoW (eds) Cities of the South: Citizenship and Exclusion in the 21st Century. London: Saqi, pp. 170–209.
15.
JonesR (2009) Agents of exception: Border security and the marginalization of Muslims in India. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27(5): 879–897.
16.
JonesR (2012) Spaces of refusal: Rethinking sovereign power and resistance at the border. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102(3): 685–699.
17.
KatzC (2004) Growing up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s Lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
KusakabeKOoZM (2007) Relational places of Burman women migrants in the border town of Tachilek. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography28(3): 300–313.
19.
KusakabeKPearsonR (2013) Cross-border childcare strategies of Burmese migrant workers in Thailand. Gender, Place and Culture20(8): 960–978.
20.
KusakabeKPearsonR (2015) Remittances and women’s agency: Managing networks of obligation among Burmese migrant workers in Thailand. In: HoangLAYeohB (eds) Transnational Labour Migration, Remittances and the Changing Family in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 50–81.
21.
LuryC (2009) From one to multiplicity. In: AscioneG (ed.) Cultures of Change: Social Atoms and Electronic Lives. Barcelona: Actar and Arts Santa Monica.
22.
McDowellL (1999) Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
MabbettIChandlerD (1995) The Khmers. Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
MattinglyDJHansenER (eds) (2006) Women and Change at the U.S.–Mexico Border: Mobility, Labor, and Activism. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
25.
MezzadraSNeilsonB (2012) Between inclusion and exclusion: On the topology of global space and borders. Theory, Culture and Society29(4/5): 58–75.
26.
NishinoYKoehlerG (2011) Social protection in Myanmar: Making the case for holistic policy reform. IDS Working paper 386.
27.
OngA (2004) Graduated sovereignty in South-east Asia. Theory, Culture and Society17(4): 55–75.
PessarPRMahterSJ (2003) Transnational migration: Bringing gender in. International Migration Review37(3): 812–846.
30.
PongsawatP (2007) Border partial citizenship, border towns, and Thai-Myanmar cross-border development: Case studies at the Thai border towns. PhD Dissertation, City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley.
31.
ScottJC (2009) The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
TessierL (2015) Social protection within the framework of labour legislation reform in Myanmar: Background research summary.ILO Liaison Office in Yangon.
37.
ThantS (2003) Border trade and identity formation: A case of small-scale women traders in Muse Township, Myanmar. MSc. Thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.
38.
UNICEF (2014) Press release: More than 3 million children in Thailand do not live with their parents. 24June. Available at: www.unicef.org/media/media_73914.html (accessed 25 January 2016).
39.
Van SchendelW (2002) Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: Jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20(6): 647–668.
40.
Van SchendelWDe MaakerE (2014) Asian borderlands: Introducing their permeability, strategic uses and meanings. Journal of Borderlands Studies29(1): 3–9.
41.
VilaP (2003) Gender and the overlapping of region, nation, and ethnicity on the U.S.–Mexico border. In: VilaP (ed.) Ethnography at the Border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 73–104.
42.
WinichakulT (1994) Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
43.
WrightMW (2006) Disposable Women and Other Myths of Global Capitalism. London: Routledge.
44.
XieG (2000) Women and social change along the Vietnam–Guangxi border. In: EvansGHuttonCEngKK (eds) Where China meets Southeast Asia: Social and Cultural Change in the BORDER regions. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 312–327.
