Declining public confidence in science is a concern in the US and Europe, but it is unclear what predicts confidence in science in developed countries, let alone in developing countries. This article examines how development and ‘risk society’ shape individual attitudes toward science across 47 diverse countries, using four theoretically driven measures of risk society. It is found that people in affluent societies have lower support for science than those in less affluent societies. Specifically, individuals holding post-materialist attitudes and living in countries with greater human and economic development (measured by higher internet access and tertiary enrollment, and lower infant mortality) have lower confidence in future-oriented science. The article concludes that the scientific gains that are brought by affluence are accompanied by heightened fears of human-made risks.
AbramsonPR (2011) Critiques and counter-critiques of the postmaterialism thesis: Thirty-four years of debate. Center for the Study of Democracy, UC Irvine. Available at: escholarship.org/uc/item/3f72v9q4 (accessed 1 October 2015).
2.
AmooreLde GoedeM (eds) (2008) Risk and the War on Terror. New York: Routledge.
3.
BakH-J (2002) Education and public attitudes toward science: Implications for the ‘deficit model’ of education and support for science and technology. Social Science Quarterly82(4): 779–795.
4.
BauerMDurantJEvansG (1994) European public perceptions of science. International Journal of Public Opinion Research6(2): 163–186.
5.
BauerMWShuklaRAllumN (2012) The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science Across the Globe. New York: Routledge.
6.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
BeckU (2014) Risk society as a political category. In: RosaEARennOMcCrightAM (eds) The Risk Society Revisited: Social Theory and Governance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
BeckUGiddensALashS (1994) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Traditions, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BerezowABCampbellH (2012) Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left. New York: Perseus.
10.
ButtelFHFlinnWL (1978) Social class and mass environmental beliefs: A reconsideration. Environment and Behavior10(3): 433–450.
11.
CeccoliSHixonW (2012) Explaining attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the European Union. International Political Science Review33(3): 301–319.
12.
DouglasM (1985) Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
DunlapR (1998) Lay perceptions of global risk: Public views of global warming in cross-national context. International Sociology13(4): 473–498.
15.
DunlapREYorkR (2008) The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly49(3): 529–563.
16.
EricsonRHaggertyKD (1997) Policing the Risk Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
FinucaneMLHolupJL (2005) Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: An overview of the literature. Social Science and Medicine60(7): 1603–1612.
18.
FoxMFFirebaughG (1992) Confidence in science: The gender gap. Social Science Quarterly73(1): 101–113.
19.
FranzenAMeyerR (2010) Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review26(2): 219–234.
20.
GansHJ (2004) Democracy and the News. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
GauchatG (2011) The cultural authority of science: Public trust and acceptance of organized science. Public Understanding of Science20(6): 751–770.
22.
GauchatG (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review77(2): 167–187.
23.
GiddensA (1999) Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review62(1): 1–10.
24.
GuhaRMartínez-AlierJ (1997) Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South. London: Earthscan Publications.
25.
HaerlinBParrD (1999) How to restore public trust in science. Nature400(5): 499.
26.
HeurtebiseJ (2015) Global risks: Cause and consequence of the new interactions between science, technology, and society. In: ArchibugiDFilippettiA (eds) The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation. New York: Wiley.
27.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000) Science and Society: Third Report. London.
28.
InglehartR (1971) The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review65(4): 991–1017.
29.
InglehartR (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
InglehartR (2006) Mapping global values. Comparative Sociology5(2): 115–136.
31.
JacobsDCarmichaelJT (2002) The political sociology of the death penalty: A pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review67(1): 109–131.
32.
KataA (2012) Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm: An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine30(25): 3778–3789.
KrahmannE (2011) Beck and beyond: Selling security in the world risk society. Review of International Studies37(01): 349–372.
35.
LambertAJChasteenAL (1997) Perceptions of disadvantage versus conventionality: Political values and attitudes toward the elderly versus blacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23(5): 469–481.
36.
LeggeJSJDurantRF (2010) Public opinion, risk assessment, and biotechnology: Lessons from attitudes toward genetically modified food in the European Union. Review of Policy Research27(1): 59–76.
37.
LeiserowitzAAMaibachEWRoser-RenoufC. (2013) Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist57(6): 818–837.
38.
LewandowskySGignacGEOberauerK (2013) The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS ONE8(10): e75637.
39.
Martínez-AlierJ (1995) The environment as a luxury good or ‘too poor to be green’?Ecological Economics13(1): 1–10.
40.
MillerD (1999) Risk, science and policy: Definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE. Social Science and Medicine49(9): 1239–1255.
41.
MillerJDPardoR (2001) Civic scientific literacy and attitude to science and technology: A comparative analysis of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. In: DierkesMVon GroteC (eds) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology. New York: Routledge, pp. 81–130.
42.
MoaddelM (2012) The Arab Spring and Egyptian Revolution Makers: Predictors of Participation. Population Studies Center Research Report. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
43.
MooneyC (2006) The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books.
44.
MooneyCKirshenbaumS (2009) Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future. New York: Basic Books.
45.
ReddyVGastrowMJuanA. (2013) Public attitudes to science in South Africa. South African Journal of Science109(1–2): 1–8.
46.
ReidpathDAlloteyP (2003) Infant mortality rate as an indicator of population health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health57(5): 344–346.
47.
RosaEMcCrightARennO (2015) The Risk Society Revisited: Social Theory and Risk Governance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
48.
StrydomP (2002) Risk, Environment, and Society: Ongoing Debates, Current Issues, and Future Prospects. New York: Open University Press.
49.
Taylor-GoobyPZinnJO (2006) Current directions in risk research: New developments in psychology and sociology. Risk Analysis26(2): 397–411.
50.
TullochJ (2008) Culture and risk. In: ZinnJ (ed.) Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
World Bank (2014a) Updated Income Classifications. Washington, DC: World Bank.
52.
World Bank (2014b) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
53.
World Values Survey (2014) Wave 6 2010–2014 Official Aggregate v.20140429. Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS. Madrid, Spain. Available at: www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
