This article adapts Robert Merton’s theory of coping with social strain to revisit the main paradigms in the literature of migrant adaptation. Intersecting this literature with Merton’s theory of coping with social strain and the ideas of emergence and resistance, the authors develop five new ideal types of migrant adaptation: (1) migrant conformity through straight-line assimilation; (2) migrant ritualism through multidirectional assimilation; (3) migrant retreatism through segmented assimilation; (4) migrant innovation through transnationalism; and (5) migrant rebellion through cosmopolitanism. The authors’ typology makes the point that migrant adaptation is a plural and ambiguous process, which needs to be understood and explained to identify the causes and effects of long-term migrant adaptation, integration or non-integration. The results show that these ideal types provide an explanation of how and why many of the paradigms on which the literature on migrant adaptation is based also lead to different forms of migrant non-adaptation.
BhabhaH (1994) The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
11.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.
12.
CalhounC (2008) Cosmopolitanism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism14(3): 427–448.
13.
CarensJH (2005) The integration of immigrants. Journal of Moral Philosophy2(1): 29–46.
14.
ChanKB (ed.) (2000) Chinese Business Networks: State, Economy and Culture. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
15.
ChanKB (2002) Both sides now: Culture contact, hybridization, and cosmopolitanism. In: VertovecSCohenR (eds) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–208.
16.
ChanKB (2003) Imaging/desiring cosmopolitanism. Global Change, Peace and Security15(2): 139–155.
17.
ChanKB (2005a) Chinese Identities, Ethnicity and Cosmopolitanism. London and New York: Routledge.
18.
ChanKB (2005b) Migration, Ethnic Relations and Chinese Business. London and New York: Routledge.
19.
ChanKB (2008) Transnationalism and its personal and social consequences for Chinese transmigrants. World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution64(3): 187–221.
20.
ChanKB (2010) Chinese Businessmen: Ethnic Resources and Business Strategies. [in Chinese] Hong Kong: Chung Hwa Book Company.
21.
ChanKB (2011) Hybridity: Promises and Limits. Whitby: de Sitter.
22.
ChanKB (ed.) (2012a) Hybrid Hong Kong. London and New York: Routledge.
23.
ChanKB (ed.) (2012b) Cultural Hybridity: Contradictions and Dilemmas. London: Routledge.
24.
ChanKBChanWW (2010) The return of the native: Globalization and the adaptive responses of transmigrants. World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution66(6): 398–434.
25.
ChanKBChanWW (2012) Social strain and the adaptive behavior of Hong Kong return migrants. In: PlüssCChanKB (eds) Living Intersections: Transnational Migrant Identifications in Asia. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 73–97.
26.
ChanKBChanWW (n.d.) Return migrants in Israel, Singapore and Hong Kong.
27.
ChanKBChanWWChongTM (2012) Living Together: Mainland China Professionals and Cultural and Artistic Workers in Hong Kong. [in Chinese] Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
28.
ChaturvediR (2011) Somehow it happened: Violence, culpability, and the Hindu nationalist community. Cultural Anthropology26(3): 340–362.
29.
DelantyG (2006) The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. The British Journal of Sociology57(1): 25–47.
30.
Du BoisWEB (2008) Of our spiritual strivings. In: KhagramSLevittP (eds) The Transnational Studies Reader: Intersections and Innovations. New York: Routledge, pp. 217–221.
31.
DurkheimE (1927) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
32.
FeatherstoneDPhilipsRWatersJ (2007) Introduction: Spatialities of transnational networks. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs7(4): 383–391.
33.
FonerN (2007) How exceptional is New York: Migration and multiculturalism in the empire city. Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6): 999–1023.
34.
GansH (1973) Foreword. In: SandbergN (ed.) Ethnic Identity and Assimilation: The Polish Community. New York: Praeger, pp. vii–xiii.
35.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
GlazerNMoynihanDP (1970) Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews and Italians of New York City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Glick SchillerN (2005) Lived simultaneity and discourses of diasporic difference. In: AndersonWWRobertGL (eds) Displacements and Diasporas: Asians in the Americas. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 159–169.
38.
Glick SchillerNLevittP (2007) Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. In: PortesADeWindJ (eds) Rethinking Migration. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 181–218.
39.
Glick SchillerNBaschLBlancC (1999) From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. In: PriesL (ed.) Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 73–105.
40.
Glick SchillerNDarievaTGruner-DomicS (2011) Defining cosmopolitan sociability in a transnational age. Ethnic and Racial Studies34(3): 399–418.
41.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
42.
GoffmanE (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
43.
HannerzU (2008) ‘Nigerian Kung Fu, Manhattan Fatwa’ and ‘The local and the global: Continuity and change’. In: KhagramSLevittP (eds) The Transnational Studies Reader: Intersections and Innovations. New York: Routledge, pp. 235–250.
44.
HardtMNegriA (2004) Globalization as empire. In: HeldDMcGrewA (eds) The Global Transformations Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 116–119.
45.
HoELE (2011) Identity politics and cultural asymmetries: Singaporean transmigrants ‘Fashioning’ cosmopolitanism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies7(5): 729–746.
46.
MertonRK (1938) Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review3(5): 672–682.
47.
NganLChanKB (2012) The Chinese Face in Australia: Multi-generational Ethnicity among Australian-born Chinese. New York: Springer.
48.
OngA (1999) Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
49.
ParkRE (1950) Race and Culture. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
50.
ParkREBurgessEW (1921) Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
PieterseJN (2004) Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
52.
PlüssC (2005) Constructing globalized ethnicity: Migrants from India in Hong Kong. International Sociology20(2): 201–224.
53.
PlüssC (2011) Baghdadi Jews in early colonial Hong Kong: Social capital and converting cultural, social and economic resources in trans-regional networks under conditions of globalization. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs11(1): 82–96.
54.
PlüssC (2012) Chinese-Singaporean repeat migrant women: Transnational positions and social inequalities. In: PlüssCChanKB (eds) Living Intersections: Transnational Migrant Identifications in Asia. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 125–147.
55.
PlüssC (n.d.) Transnational self-reflexivity: Analyzing migrants constructions of cultural hybridity and cosmopolitanism.
56.
PortesA (1995) Children of immigrants: Segmented assimilation and its determinants. In: PortesA (ed.) The Economic Sociology of Immigration. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 248–279.
57.
PortesA (2004) Global villagers: The rise of transnational communities. In: MobasherMMSadriM (eds) Migration, Globalization and Ethnic Relations: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 228–232.
58.
PortesARumbautR (1990) Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
59.
PortesAZhouM (2005) The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. In: Suarez-OrozcoCSuarez-OrozcoMQin-HilliarDB (eds) The New Immigration: An Interdisciplinary Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 85–104.
60.
PortesAEscobarCWalton RadfordA (2007) Immigrant transnational organizations and development: A comparative study. International Migration Review41(1): 242–281.
61.
RemennickL (2003) What does integration mean? Social insertions of Russian immigrants in Israel. Journal of International Migration and Integration4(1): 23–49.
62.
RoudomentofV (2005) Transnationalism, cosmopolitanism and glocalization. Current Sociology53(1): 113–135.
63.
SafranW (1991) Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and return. Diapsora: A Journal of Transnational Studies1(1): 83–99.
64.
StegerM (2003) Ideologies of globalization: Market globalism, justice globalism, jihadist globalism. In: StegerM (ed.) Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 98–128.
65.
WaldingerRLichterM (2007) ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Employer preferences in hiring. In: KivistoPHartungE (eds) Intersecting Inequalities: Class, Race, Sex and Sexualities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 164–170.
66.
WimmerAGlick SchillerN (2002) Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs2(4): 301–334.
67.
YanceyWLEricksenEPJulianiRN (1976) Emergent ethnicity: A review and reformulation. American Sociological Review41(3): 391–403.
68.
YeohBSA (2004) Cosmopolitanism and its exclusion in Singapore. Urban Studies41(12): 2431–2445.
69.
ZhouMLinM (2005) Community transformation and the formation of ethnic capital: Immigrant Chinese communities in the United States. Journal of Chinese Overseas12(2): 260–284.
