This article dissects the role of culture in securing authority relations within a militarized police apparatus. Adding structure and power to the symbolic interactionist approach to organizational culture and interests and positionality to the structural functionalist perspective on militarized organizations, the author examines how, through the preservation and imposition of a sacralized worldview and morality (symbolic violence), police officers – the commanding caste of a two-tiered type of police organization – manage to charismatically legitimate the internal distribution of authority and its exercise in the relations between commanding officers and the non-commissioned officers, turning sheer bureaucratic authority into charismatic power (symbolic power). The author draws on ethnographic observations, interview data, and a structural-semantic analysis to reconstruct the system of beliefs involved and to describe the practices and mechanisms through which intra-bureaucratic domination is charismatically legitimated and made effective. These processes are examined both in everyday relations of command and in the extraordinary event of a police mutiny.
AbrahamsonB (1972) Professional socialization: Theory, ethics, corporateness. Military Professionalization and Political Power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 54–64.
2.
AuyeroJ (2007) La Zona Gris. Violencia colectiva y política partidaria en la Argentina contemporánea. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
3.
BarrenecheO (2009) La reorganización de las policias en Buenos Aires y Córdoba. 1936–1940. In: MoreyraBMayorS (eds) Pensar y construir los grupos sociales: Córdoba y Buenos Aires, siglos XVI–XX. Córdoba: Centro Estudios Históricos.
4.
BorduaDReissA (1966) Command, control and charisma: Reflections on police bureaucracy. American Journal of Sociology72(1): 68–76.
5.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
BourdieuP (1991 [1973]) On symbolic power. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, pp. 163–170.
7.
BourdieuP (1996) The State Nobility: Elites School in the Field of Power, trans. CloughL.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BourdieuP (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BourdieuP (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
BourdieuPWacquantLJD (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
11.
BrinksD (2008) The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CandinaA (2005) Carabineros de Chile: Una mirada histórica a la identidad institucional. In: BaileyJDammertL (eds) Seguridad y reforma policial en las Américas. Experiencias y desafíos. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
13.
DavisA (1948) Bureaucratic patterns in the Navy Officer’s Corp. Social Forces27: 143–153.
14.
EatonK (2008) Paradoxes of police reform: Federalism, parties and civil society in Argentina’s public security crisis. Latin American Research Review43(3): 5–32.
15.
EilbaumL (2004) La policía ‘al servicio de la comunidad’: Tradición policial y vientos de cambio. In: TiscorniaS (ed.) Burocracias y violencia. Estudios de antropologia juridica. Buenos Aires: Antropofagia.
16.
EmirbayerMJohnsonV (2008) Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society37(1): 1–44.
17.
FineGA (1984) Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. American Review of Sociology10: 239–262.
18.
FreemanF (1948) The army as a social structure. Social Forces28: 78–83.
19.
FruhlingH (2009) Dos décadas de reforma policial en América Latina: Factores que inciden en su éxito o fracaso. Violencia y policía en América Latina. Quito: FLACSO.
20.
Garriga ZucalJ (2010) Se lo merecen: Definiciones morales del uso de la fuerza entre los miembros de la policía bonaerense. Cuadernos de Antropología Social32: 75–94.
21.
GoffmanE (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
22.
Gonzalez FigoliH (1998) Principios de mando policial. Córdoba: Policía de la Provincia de Córdoba.
23.
HalletT (2003) Symbolic power and organizational culture. Sociological Theory21: 128–149.
24.
HalletT (2007) Between deference and distinction: Interaction ritual through symbolic power in an educational institution. Social Psychology Quarterly70: 148–171.
25.
HalletTVentrescaM (2006) Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’sPatterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society35: 213–236.
26.
HathazyP (2006) Los cuerpos del orden: Técnicas corporales y trabajo policial antidisturbios. In: PapaliniV (ed.) Cuerpo y comunicación. Al Margen: La Plata.
27.
HintonMS (2006) The State on the Streets: Police and Politics in Argentina and Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
28.
JaimeR (2002) Padre Nuestro que estabas en el Bronce. Córdoba: AR&A, Inc.
29.
JaimeR (2005) 432 Aniversario de la Policia de Cordoba. 1573–2005. Córdoba: Alfa.
30.
LamontM (2000) The Dignity of Working Men. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
LandeBJ (2005) Drive on: How soldiers embody ethical dispositions. MA Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of California Berkeley.
32.
MertonRK (1952 [1940]) Bureaucratic structure and personality. In: MertonRGrayAHockeyBSelvinH (eds) Reader in Bureaucracy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
33.
Policía de Córdoba (1989) Memoria anual. Córdoba: Policía de la Provincia de Córdoba.
34.
Policía de Córdoba, General Personnel Directorate (2002) Internal Disciplinary Regulations. Córdoba: Policía de la Provincia de Córdoba.
35.
Policía de Córdoba, Training Directorate (2005) La policia hoy. Córdoba: Policía de la Provincia de Córdoba.
36.
ReinerR (1991) Police culture. The Politics of the Police. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–106.
37.
RobinR (1973) Approches des champs sémantiques: Les experiences du Centre de lexicologie politique de Saint-Claude. Historie et Linguistique. Paris: Armand Colin, pp. 94–134.
38.
RoseA (1946) The social structure of army. American Journal of Sociology51: 361–364.
39.
SaL (2002) Os Filhos do estado: auto-imagen e disciplina na formação dos oficiais da Polícia Militar de Ceará. Rio de Janeiro: Relumé Dumará.
40.
SaL (2011) A desincorporação e a crise da crença do oficialato: ocaso da Academia de Polícia Militar do Ceará. In: XXVIII Latin American Sociological Association Meeting, Recife, 6–11 August.
41.
SemirazD (1999) Reingenieria policial en Argentina. Córdoba: Eudecor.
42.
SirimarcoM (2009) De civil a policía. Una etnografía del proceso de incorporación a la institución policial. Buenos Aires: Teseo.
43.
SkolnickJ (1966) Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
44.
SozzoM (2005) Policia, violencia y democracia. Santa Fe: Universidad Nacional del Litoral.
45.
SwidlerA (1986) Culture as symbols and culture in action. American Sociological Review51(3): 273–286.
46.
UildriksN. (2009) Policing Insecurity: Police Reform, Security and Human Rights in Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
47.
UngarM (2002) Elusive Reform: Democracy and the Rule of Law in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
48.
UngarM (2009) Police reform in Argentina: Public security versus human rights. In: Uildriks N et al. Policing Insecurity: Police Reform, Security and Human Rights in Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
49.
WeberM (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
50.
WeberM (1992) Economy and Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
51.
ZanattaL (1996) Del estado liberal a la nacion catolica. Iglesia y ejercito en los orígenes del Peronismo. Quilmes, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
