This article examines cross-national differences in the time parents allocate to their children using aggregate data from 15 countries collected as part of the Harmonized European Time Use Survey (HETUS). The analysis is restricted to married or cohabiting parents with at least one child under the age of seven. Results show large differences between countries; differences which appear to be associated with four main national characteristics: the countries’ level of economic development, the number of hours spent in paid work, values regarding gender roles, and post-materialist values. Some elements of the countries’ work–family policies also appear to matter but their overall effect is less conclusive.
ApparalaMLReifmanAMunschJ (2003) Cross-national comparison of attitudes towards fathers’ and mothers’ participation in household tasks and childcare. Sex Roles48(5/6): 189–203.
2.
CraigL (2006) Parental education, time in paid work and time with children: An Australian time-diary analysis. British Journal of Sociology57(4): 553–575.
3.
CraigLMullanK (2010) Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family72(5): 1344–1361.
4.
Del BocaD (2002) The effect of childcare and part-time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics15(3): 549–573.
5.
DragoR (2009) What would they do? Childcare under parental leave and reduced hours options. Working Paper No. 09-03, Penn State Population Research Institute. Available at: papers.ccpr.ucla.edu (accessed 15 December 2009).
6.
Eurostat (2004) How Europeans spend their time: Everyday life of women and men. Data 1998–2002. European Commission;. Available at: epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu(accessed 29 April 2009).
FedickCBPacholokSGauthierAH (2005) Methodological issues in the estimation of parental time: Analysis of measures in a Canadian time-use survey. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research2(1): 67–87.
9.
FolbreNYoonJ (2008) Economic development and time devoted to direct unpaid care activities: An analysis of the Harmonized European Time Use Survey (HETUS). Background paper commissioned for the UNRISD Flagship report on Poverty. UNRISD (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development), Geneva.
10.
GauthierAH (2005) Trends in policies for family-friendly societies. In: MacuraALMHaug MacDonaldW (eds) The New Demographic Regime: Population Challenges and Policy Responses. Geneva: United Nations, pp. 95–110.
11.
GauthierAHSmeedingTMFurstenbergFF (2004) Are parents investing less time in children? Trends in selected industrialized countries. Population and Development Review30(4): 647–671.
12.
GeistC (2005) The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review21(1): 23–41.
13.
GershunyJSullivanO (2003) Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society10(2): 205–228.
14.
GornickJCMeyersMK (2003) Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
GregoryAMilnerS (2008) Fatherhood regimes and father involvement in France and the UK. Community, Work and Family11(1): 61–84.
16.
GrossDR (1984) Time allocation: A tool for the study of cultural behavior. Annual Review of Anthropology13: 519–558.
17.
GuryanJHurstEKearneyM (2008) Parental education and parental time with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives22(3): 23–46.
18.
HallbergDKlevmarkenA (2003) Time for children: A study of parents’ time allocation. Journal of Population Economics16(2): 205–226.
19.
HenwoodKProcterJ (2003) The ‘good father’: Reading men’s accounts of paternal involvement during the transition to first-time fatherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology42(3): 337–355.
20.
HillerDV (1984) Power dependency and division of family work. Sex Roles10: 1003–1019.
21.
HofferthSL (2001) Women’s employment and care of children in the United States. In: Van DijkLVan der LippeT (eds) Women’s Employment in Comparative Perspective. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 151–174.
22.
HookJL (2006) Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review71(4): 639–660.
23.
IngelhartRBakerWE (2000) Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review65(1): 19–51.
24.
InglehartRWelzelC (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
JoeschJMSpiessCK (2006) European mothers’ time spent looking after children: Differences and similarities across nine countries. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research3(1): 1–27.
26.
KalilADeLeireT (eds) (2004) Family Investments in Children’s Potential. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
KitterødRH (2001) Does the recording of parallel activities in time use diaries affect the way people report their main activities?Social Indicators Research56(2): 145–178.
28.
KitterødRHPettersenSV (2006) Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work, Employment and Society20(3): 473–492.
29.
MonnaBGauthierAH (2008) A review of the literature on the social and economic determinants of parental time. Journal of Family and Economic Issues29(4): 634–653.
30.
NockSKingstonPW (1988) Time with children: The impact of couples’ work schedules. Social Forces67(1): 59–85.
31.
NoonanMCEstesSBGlassJL (2007) Do workplace flexibility policies influence time spent in domestic labor?Journal of Family Issues28(2): 263–288.
32.
OECD (2001) Balancing Work and Family Life: Helping Parents into Paid Employment. Paris: OECD.
33.
RapoportBLe BourdaisC (2006) Parental time, work schedules and changing gender roles. In: McQuillanKRavaneraZR (eds) Canada’s Changing Families: Implications for Individuals and Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 179–209.
34.
RobinsonJPGodbeyG (1997) Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. College Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
35.
RomanoMCBruzzeseD (2007) Fathers’ participation in the domestic activities of everyday life. Social Indicators Research84: 97–116.
36.
SayerLCGornickJC (2008) Cross-national variation in the influence of employment on child care time. In: 2007 PAA and at a 2008 workshop, University of Stavanger, Norway.
37.
SayerLCBianchiSMRobinsonJP (2004) Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology110(1): 1–43.
38.
SmithAJWilliamsDR (2007) Father-friendly legislation and paternal time across Western Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis9(2): 175–192.
39.
StonePJ (1972) Childcare in twelve countries. In: SzalaiA (ed.) The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Population in Twelve Countries. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 249–264.
40.
SullivanOColtraneSMcAnnallyLAltintasE (2009) Father-friendly policies and time-use data in a cross-national context: Potential and prospects for future research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceJuly: 234–254.
Van de KaaDJ (2002) The idea of second demographic transition in industrialized countries. In: Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Tokyo, 29 January.
43.
ZickCDBryantWD (1996) A new look at parents’ time spent in child care: Primary and secondary time use. Social Science Research25(3): 260–280.
