Is there a relationship between the global hegemonic position of the US on the one hand, and imperialistic activities such as war-making, sending troops abroad, colonial annexation and/or temporary military occupation? In an attempt to offer a preliminary answer to this question, this article offers a novel longitudinal analysis of US imperialistic activities from 1787 to 2003, and shows that America's imperialistic activity has been punctuated by waves of high amplitude and frequency. The article also shows that each of these waves correspond to different phases in America's career. Specifically, they are associated with America's movement from regional to hemispheric to global dominance and, ultimately, to its decline from its prior hegemonic status. The analysis offers preliminary support for a new theory of the relationship between hegemony and imperialistic activity.
Afoaku, O. (2000) ‘US Foreign Policy and Authoritarian Regimes: Change and ontinuity in International Clientelism’ , Journal of Third World Studies17: 13–40 .
2.
Agnew, J. A. (1987) The United States in the World-Economy: A Regional Geography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Arrighi, G. (1994) The Long Twentieth Century. London: Verso .
4.
Arrighi, G. , Silver, B. J. and Ahmad, I. (1999) Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
5.
Bacevich, A. J. (2002) American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of US Diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
6.
Bergesen, A. and Sahoo, C. (1985) ‘Evidence of the Decline of American Hegemony in World Production’ , Review8: 595–611 .
7.
Bergesen, A. and Schoenberg, R. (1980) ‘Long Waves of Colonial Expansion and Contraction’, in A. Bergesen (ed.) Studies of the Modern World-System, pp. 231–277. New York: Academic Press .
8.
Boot, M. (2001) ‘The Case for American Empire’ , The Weekly Standard7.
9.
Boswell, T. (1989) ‘Colonial Empires and the Capitalist World-Economy: A Time Series Analysis of Colonization, 1640–1960’ , American Sociological Review54: 180–196 .
10.
Boswell, T. (1995) ‘Hegemony and Bifurcation Points in World History’ , Journal of World-Systems Research1(15): 1–63 (http://jwsr.ucr.edu).
11.
Boswell, T. (2004) ‘American World Empire or Declining Hegemony’ , Journal of World-Systems Research10: 516–524 .
12.
Boswell, T. and Sweat, M. (1991) ‘Hegemony, Long Waves and Major Wars’ , International Studies Quarterly35: 123–150 .
13.
Brenner, R. (2002) The Boom and the Bubble: The US in the World Economy. London and New York: Verso .
14.
Brewer, A. (1990) Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey. London and New York: Routledge .
15.
Chase-Dunn, C. and Podobnik, B. (1995) ‘The Next World War: World-System Cycles and Trends’ , Journal of World-Systems Research1(6): 6–46 . (http://jwsr.ucr.edu)
16.
Chase-Dunn, C. and Rubinson, R. (1979) ‘Toward a Structural Perspective on the World-System’ , Politics and Society7: 453–476 .
17.
Chase-Dunn, C. , Giem, R. , Jorgenson, A. , Reifer, T. , Rogers, J. and Shoon Lio (2002) The Trajectory of the United States in the World-System: A Quantitative Reflection, The Institute for Research on World-Systems Working Paper No. 8; at: irows.ucr.edu/papers/irows8/irows8.htm (accessed 3 December 2005).
18.
Collier, E. (1993) Instances of the Use of United States Forces Abroad, 1798–1993. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .
19.
Corden, W. M. (1990) ‘American Decline and the End of Hegemony’ , SAIS Review10: 13–26 .
20.
Crapol, E. (1979) ‘John Quincy Adams and the Monroe Doctrine: Some New Evidence’, Pacific Historical Review48-48.
21.
Cumings, B. (1999) ‘Still the American Century’ , Review of International Studies25: 271–299 .
22.
Daalder, H. (1968) ‘Imperialism’, in D. L. Sills (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, pp. 101–109. New York: Macmillan/The Free Press .
23.
Doyle, M. W. (1986) Empires. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press .
24.
Du Boff, R. (2003) ‘US Hegemony: Continuing Decline, Enduring Danger’ , Monthly Review55: 1–15 .
25.
Eblen, J. E. (1968) The First and Second United States Empires. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press .
26.
Ferguson, N. (2003) Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power. New York: Basic Books .
27.
Ferguson, N. (2004) Colossus: The Price of America's Empire. New York: Penguin .
28.
Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press .
29.
Gilpin, R. (2002) ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’, in P. K. O'Brien and A. Cleese (eds) Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001, pp. 165–182. Aldershot: Ashgate .
30.
Goldstein, J. S. (1988) Long Cycles: Prosperity and War in the Modern Age. New aHaven, CT: Yale University Press .
31.
Graebner, N. A. (1983) Empire on the Pacific: A Study in American Continental Expansion. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio .
32.
Haas, R. (1994) Intervention: The Use of Military Force in the Post Cold-War World. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace .
33.
Harvey, D. (2003) The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
34.
Hensel, P. R. and Mitchell, S. M. (2003) ‘Territorial Claims Data: Issue Correlates of War Project’, Department of Political Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee .
35.
Howe, S. (2003) ‘American Empire: The History and Future of an Idea’, Open Democracy; at: www.globalpolicy.org/empire/history/2003/0612idea.htm (accessed 4 February 2005).
36.
Ignatieff, M. (2003) ‘The American Empire: The Burden’, The New York Times Sunday Magazine 5 January.
37.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2001) ‘American Power and the Empire of Capitalist Democracy’, in M. Cox , K. Booth and T. Dunne (eds) Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformations in International Politics, pp. 191–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
38.
Kaplan, S. and Blechman, B. (1978) ‘Political Use of the United States Armed Forces, 1946–1976’ (Computer File), Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI .
39.
Kegley, C. W. (1991) The Long Postwar Peace: Contending Explanations and Projections. New York: HarperCollins .
40.
Kennedy, P. M. (1984) ‘Continuity and Discontinuity in British Imperialism 1815–1914’, in C. C. Eldridge (ed.) British Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century, pp. 20–38. New York: St Martin's Press .
41.
Kennedy, P. M. (1987) The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House .
42.
Kindleberger, C. (1973) The World in Depression, 1929–39. Berkeley: University of California Press .
43.
Klingberg, F. L. (1952) ‘The Historical Alternation of Moods in American Foreign Policy’ , World Politics4: 239–273 .
44.
Klingberg, F. L. (1996) Positive Expectations of America's World Role: Historical Cycles of Realistic Idealism. New York: University Press of America Inc.
45.
LaFeber, W. (1989) The American Age: United States Foreign Policy at Home And Abroad since1750-1750. New York: Norton .
46.
Lake, D. (1991) ‘British and American Hegemony Compared: Lessons for the Current Era of Decline’, in M. Fry (ed.) History, the White House, and the Kremlin: Statesmen as Historians, pp. 106–122. London: Pinter Publishers .
47.
Layne, C. and Schwarz, B. (1993) ‘American Hegemony–Without an Enemy’ , Foreign Policy92: 5–23 .
48.
Lenin, V. (1939) Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism. New York: International Publishers .
49.
Louis, W. R. and Robinson, R. (1994) ‘The Imperialism of Decolonization’ , Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History22: 462–511 .
50.
Mandelbaum, M. (1988) The Fate of Nations: The Search for National Security in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press .
51.
Mann, M. (2003) Incoherent Empire. London and New York: Verso .
52.
Mearsheimer, J. (1990) ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’ , International Security15: 5–54 .
53.
Modelski, G. (1978) ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’ , Comparative Studies in Society and History20: 214–235 .
54.
Modelski, G. (1996) Leading Sectors and World Powers: The Coevolution of Global Politics and Economics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press .
55.
Modelski, G. and Thompson, W. R. (1988) Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993. Seattle: University of Washington Press .
56.
Nye, J. S. (1990) Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books .
57.
O'Brien, P. K. (2002) ‘The Pax Britannica and American Hegemony: Precedent, Antecedent or Just Another History?’, in P. K. O'Brien and A. Cleese (eds) Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001, pp. 1–64. Aldershot: Ashgate .
58.
Pigman, G. A. (2002) ‘Hegemony Theory, Unilateral Trade Liberalisation and the 1996 US Farm Bill’, in P. K. O'Brien and A. Cleese (eds) Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001, pp. 258–283. Aldershot: Ashgate .
59.
Pollins, B. M. (1994) ‘Cannons and Capital: The Use of Coercive Diplomacy by Major Powers in the Twentieth Century’, in F. W. Wayman and P. F. Diehl (eds) Reconstructing Realpolitik, pp. 29–54. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
60.
Robinson, R. and Gallagher, J. (1953) ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’ , Economic History Review6: 1–15 .
61.
Russett, B. (1985) ‘The Mysterious Case of Vanishing Hegemony; or, is Mark Twain Really Dead?’ , International Organization39: 207–231 .
62.
Sandars, C. T. (2000) America's Overseas Garrisons: The Leasehold Empire. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press .
63.
Smith, T. (1981) The Pattern of Imperialism: The United States, Great Britain, and the Late-Industrializing World since1815-1815. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press .
64.
Stein, A. A. (1984) ‘The Hegemon's Dilemma: Great Britain, the United States, and the International Economic Order’ , International Organization38: 355–386 .
65.
Strange, S. (1987) ‘The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony’ , International Organization41: 551–574 .
66.
Tillema, H. K. (1973) Appeal to Force: American Military Intervention in the Era of Containment. New York: Thomas Crowell Company .
67.
US Congress Committee on Foreign Affairs (1970) Background Information on the Use of United States Armed Forces in Foreign Countries. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .
68.
Wallerstein, I. (1984) ‘The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World Economy’, in G. Lenski (ed.) Current Issues aand Research in Macrosociology, pp. 100–107. Leiden: E. J. Brill .
69.
Wallerstein, I. (2002a) ‘The Eagle Has Crash Landed,’Foreign Policy July/August: 60–68.
70.
Wallerstein, I. (2002b) ‘Three Hegemonies’, in P. K. O'Brien and A. Cleese (eds) Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001, pp. 357–361. Aldershot: Ashgate .
71.
Wallerstein, I. (2003a) The Decline of American Power: The US in a Chaotic World. New York: New Press .
72.
Wallerstein, I. (2003b) ‘US Weakness and the Struggle for Hegemony’, Monthly Review55-55; at: www.monthlyreview.org/0703wallerstein.htm (accessed 1 February 2004).
73.
Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
