At the start of the third millennium social scientists’ preoccupation with the weakening of Gemeinschaft is - particularly in western postmodern societies - again at its peak. Waning social capital is believed to have undermined community, as reflected in widespread feelings of social mistrust, in citizens turning away from prime institutions and political authorities, and even engaging less in informal interactions. This diagnosis of civil society as advanced by especially American scholars would be a very serious account of our present times, if the debate and research in this field were not impaired by a set of equally serious theoretical and methodological problems. This article addresses a number of these basic problems. The main issue is the lack of sensitivity in civil society studies to new, alternative and innovative forms of solidarity, connectedness and civic and political engagement, particularly those facilitated by the Internet. It is time to thoroughly define today’s forms of civil society made by contemporary people with contemporary means, in a contemporary world. This article aims to reframe the civil society research agenda.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, G. A. and Verba, S. ( 1973 ) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
2.
Bennett, L. W. ( 1998 ) ‘The Uncivic Culture: Communication, Identity, and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics’ , PS Political Sciences and Politics31 : 741 - 761 .
3.
Berger, P. L. and Neuhaus, R. J. ( 1996 ) To Empower People: From State to Civil Society . Washington, DC : American Enterprise Institute .
Davis, R. ( 1999 ) The Web of Politics. The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System . New York : Oxford University Press .
8.
Dekker, P. ( 1995 ) ‘Participatie in de civil society: verwachtingen en empirische bevindingen’ , in M. Wissenburg (ed.) Civil Politics and Civil Society , pp. 121 - 150 . Nijmegen : Nijmegen University
9.
Dekker, P. , ed. ( 1999 ) Vrijwilligerswerk vergeleken. Nederland in internationaal en historisch perspectief. Civil society en vrijwilligerswerk III . Den The Hague : Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau .
10.
Eberly, D. E. , ed. ( 2000 ) The Essential Civil Society Reader: Classic Essays in the American Civil Society Debate . Lanham, MD : Rowman and Littlefield .
11.
Ester, P. , Halman, L. and de Moor, R. , eds ( 1993 ) The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America . Tilburg : Tilburg University Press .
12.
Etzioni, A. ( 2001 ) The Monochrome Society . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
13.
Foley, M. W. and Edwards, B. ( 1997 ) ‘Escape from Politics? Social Theory and the Social Capital Debate’ , American Behavioral Scientist40 : 550 - 561 .
14.
Gray, C. H. ( 2001 ) Cyborg Citizen: Politics in the Posthuman Age . New York and London : Routledge .
15.
Guggenberger, B. ( 1999 ) Das digitale Nirwana. Vom Verlust der Wirklichkeit in der schönen neunen Online-Welt . Reinbek bei Hamburg : Rowohlt .
16.
Hague, B. N. and Loader, B. D. , eds ( 1999 ) Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age . London and New York : Routledge .
17.
Harwood, P. G. and Lay, J. C. (2001) ‘Surfing Alone: The Internet as a Facilitator of Social and Political Capital’ , paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , San Franciso , 29 August-2 September .
18.
Heim, M. ( 1998 ) Virtual Realism . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
19.
Hill, K. A. and Hughes, J. E. ( 1998 ) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet . Lanham, MD : Rowman and Littlefield .
20.
Horrocks, C. ( 2001 ) Marshall McLuhan and Virtuality . London : Icon Books / New York : Totem Books .
21.
Inglehart, R. ( 1997 ) ‘Postmaterialist Values and the Erosion of Institutional Authority’ , in J. Nye , P. D. Zelikow and D. C. King (eds) Why People Don’t Trust Government , pp. 156 - 176 . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
22.
Jennings, M. K.et al. ( 1990 ) Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies . Berlin and New York : De Gruyter .
23.
Jordan, T. ( 1999 ) Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet . London : Routledge .
24.
Jordan, T. and Taylor, P. ( 1998 ) ‘A Sociology of Hackers’ , Sociological Review46 ( 4 ): 757 - 780 .
25.
Klingemann, H.-D. and Fuchs, D. ( 1995 ) Citizens and the State . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
26.
Kollock, P. and Smith, M. A. ( 1999 ) ‘Communities in Cyberspace’ , in M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace , pp. 3 - 25 . London and New York : Routledge .
27.
Kraut, R. , Patterson, M. , Lundmark, V. , Kiesler, S. , Mukopadhyay, T. and Scherlis, W. ( 1998 ) ‘Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?’ , American Psychologist53 : 1017 - 1031 .
28.
McLean, S. L. ( 2002 ) ‘Patriotism, Generational Change, and the Politics of Sacrifice’ , in S. L. McLean , D. A. Schultz and M. B. Steger (eds) Social Capital: Critical Perspectives On Community and ‘Bowling Alone’ , pp. 147 - 166 . New York and London : New York University Press .
29.
McLuhan, M. ( 1987 ) Understanding Media: The Extension of Man . London : Ark .
30.
Misztal, B. A. ( 1996 ) Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order . Cambridge : Polity Press .
31.
Nie, N. and Erbring, L. ( 2000 ) Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report . Stanford : Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society (SIQSS) ; at: www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/
32.
Nisbet, R. ( 2000 ) ‘The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom’ , in D. Eberly (ed.) The Essential Civil Society Reader: Classic Essays in the American Civil Society Debate , pp. 33 - 50 . Lanham, MD : Rowman and Littlefield .
33.
Norris, P. , ed. ( 1999a ) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
34.
Norris, P. ( 1999b ) ‘Conclusions: The Growth of Critical Citizens and its Consequences’ , in P. Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government , pp. 327 - 334 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
35.
Norris, P. ( 2000 ) ‘The Internet in Europe: A New North-South Divide?’ , Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5 ( 1 ): 1 - 12 .
36.
Norris, P. ( 2001 ) Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet in Democratic Societies . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
37.
Norris, P. and Jones, D. ( 1998 ) ‘Virtual Democracy’ , The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics3 ( 1 ): 1 - 4 .
38.
Nye, J. S. , Zelikow, P. D. and King, D. C. , eds ( 1997 ) Why People Don’t Trust Government . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
39.
O’Brien, J. ( 1999 ) ‘Writing in the Body: Gender (Re)Production in Online Interaction’ , in M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace , pp. 76 - 104 . London and New York : Routledge .
Paxton, P. ( 1999 ) ‘Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment’ , American Journal of Sociology105 : 88 - 127 .
42.
Poster, M. ( 2001 ) What’s the Matter with the Internet? Minneapolis, MN : University of Minnesota Press .
43.
Putnam, R. D. ( 2000 ) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community . New York : Simon and Schuster .
44.
Rheingold, H. ( 2000 ) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , rev edn. Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press .
45.
Shah, D. V. , Kwak, N. and Holbert, R. L. ( 2001 ) ‘ “ Connecting” and “Disconnecting” with Civic Life: Patterns and Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’ , Political Communication18 : 141 - 162 .
46.
Skocpol, T. and Fiorina, M. P. , eds ( 1999 ) Civic Engagement in American Democracy . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press/New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
47.
Smith, A. and Kollock, P. , eds ( 1999 ) Communities in Cyberspace . London and New York : Routledge .
48.
Turkle, S. ( 1997 ) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet . New York : Touchstone .
49.
Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. ( 1999 ) ‘Virtual Communities as Communities: Net Surfers Don’t Ride Alone’ , in M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace , pp. 167 - 194 . London and New York : Routledge .
50.
Wellman, B. and Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2002 ) The Internet in Everyday Life . Malden, MA and Oxford : Blackwell .
51.
Wellman, B. , Quan-Haase, A.Boase, J. and Chen, W. (2002) ‘Examining the Internet in Everyday Life’ , Keynote address (given by Barry Wellman) to the Euricom Conference on e-Democracy , Nijmegen , October .
52.
Wilhelm, A. G. ( 2000 ) Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace . New York and London : Routledge .
53.
Winner, L. ( 1996 ) ‘Who Will We Be in Cyberspace?’ , Information Society12 ( 1 ): 63 - 72 .
54.
Wolfe, A. ( 2000 ) ‘Whose Keeper? Social Science and Moral Obligations’ , in D. Eberly (ed.) The Essential Civil Society Reader: Classic Essays in the American Civil Society Debate , pp. 51 - 68 . Lanham, MD : Rowman and Littlefield .
55.
Wuthnow, R. ( 1998 ) Loose Connections: Joining Together in America’s Fragmented Communities . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
