Abstract
Reviewing the earlier literature on methodological issues in comparative research, the paper argues that `in terms of methodology
Three goals are being emphasised: (a) to counteract the tendency to reinvent the methodological wheel; (b) to help with
Thus, `Galton's problem' - treating countries as independent cases - forces an evaluation of the pervasiveness of diffusion vs. cultural/national identity. The low stability of many measures requires rethinking the meaning of one-point measurements. Comparative surveys are by implication cross-level research. Therefore, the use of country names as explanans requires theoretical notions about the nation as context for actors and institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
