This paper argues that interpretive researchers need to consciously adopt a critical and reflective stance in relation to the role that the information technologies which they describe play in maintaining social orders and power relations in organizations. The concern of the paper is to highlight potential shortcomings in the treatment of technology in interpretive research on information systems, but also to present a specific approach to studying information technology and organization which may overcome these weaknesses. By utilizing a perspective drawn from the discursive and disciplinary work of Foucault and recent work on the sociology of technology, we can complement the thick description of interpretive research with the broader sweep of critical social theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgarM.H. (1980). The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (Academic Press, New York).
2.
ApplegateL.M. (1994). Managing in an information age: transforming the organization for the 1990s, in BaskervilleR., SmithsonS., NgwenyamaO., and DeGrossJ.I. (eds), Transforming Organizations With Information Technology (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp. 15–94.
3.
BijkerW.E., and LawJ. (ed.) (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
4.
BloomfieldB.P. (1991). The role of information systems in the UK National Health Service: action at a distance and the fetish of calculation. Social Studies of Science, 21(4), 701–34.
5.
BloomfieldB.P. (1995). Power, machines and social relations: delegating to information technology in the National Health Service, Organization, 2(3/4), pp. 489–518.
6.
BloomfieldB.P., and CoombsR. (1992). Information technology, control and power: the centralization and decentralization debate revisted. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 459–84.
7.
BloomfieldB.P., and McLeanC. (1996). Madness and organization: informed management and empowerment, in OrlikowskiW.J., WalshamG., JonesM.R., and DegrossJ.I. (eds), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work (Chapman and Hall, London) pp. 371–93.
8.
BloomfieldB.P., CoombsR., and OwenJ. (1994a). The social construction of information systems: the implications for management control, in MansellR. (ed.), The Management of Information and Communication Technologies: Emerging Patterns of Control (Aslib, London) pp. 143–57.
9.
BloomfieldB.P., CoombsR., and OwenJ. (1994b). A social science perspective on information systems in the NHS, in KeenJ. (ed.), Information Management in Health Services (Open University Press, Buckingham) pp. 135–46.
10.
BolandR.J.Jr. (1979). Control, causality and information system requirements. Accounting Organizations and Society4(4), 259–72.
11.
BolandR.J.Jr., and PondyL.R. (1983). Accounting in organizations: a union of natural and rational perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2/3), 223–34.
12.
BolandR.J.Jr., and SchultzeU. (1996). From work to activity: technology and the narrative of progress, in OrlikowskiW.J., WalshamG., JonesM.R., and DeGrossJ.I. (eds) Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work (Chapman and Hall, London) pp. 308–24.
13.
BravermanH. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (Monthly Review Press, London).
14.
BurrellG. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: the contribution of Michel Foucault. Organizational Studies, 9(2), 221–35.
15.
BurrellG., and MorganG. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life (Heinemann, London).
16.
CallonM., and LatourB. (1992). Don't throw the baby out with the Bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley, in PickeringA. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) pp. 343–68.
17.
ChuaW.F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review61(4), 601–32.
18.
ChuaW.F. (1988). Interpretive sociology and management accounting – a critical review. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 1(2), 59–79.
19.
ChuaW.F., and DegelingP. (1993). Interrogating an accounting-based intervention on three axes: instrumental, moral and aesthetic. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(4), 291–318.
20.
CleggS.R. (1989). Frameworks of Power (Sage, London).
21.
CoombsR., KnightsD., and WillmottH.C. (1992). Culture, control and competition; towards a conceptual framework for the study of information technology in organizations. Organization Studies, 13(1), 51–72.
22.
CovaleskiM.A., DirsmithM.W., and MichelmanJ.E. (1993). An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework, case-mix accounting systems and health-care organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(1), 65–80.
23.
DaviesA., and KirkpatrickI. (1995). Performance indicators, bureaucratic control and the decline of professional autonomy: the case of academic librarians, in KirkpatrickI., and LucioM.M. (eds), The Politics of Quality in the Public Sector: The Management of Change (Routledge, London) pp. 84–107.
24.
DixonJ., and KouzminA. (1994). The commercialisation of the Australian public sector: competence, elitism or default in management education?International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(6), 52–73.
25.
DobbertM.L. (1990). Discussion on methodology, in GubaE.G. (ed.) The Paradigm Dialog (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California) pp. 286–89.
26.
DoolinB. (1996). Alternative views of case research in Information Systems. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 21–9.
27.
DoolinB. (1998). Discourse, technology and organisation in a New Zealand Crown Health Enterprise. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
28.
DreyfusH.L., and RabinowP. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York).
29.
DruckerP.F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66, 45–53.
30.
DyerW.G.Jr., and WilkinsA.L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613–19.
31.
FeinglassJ., and SalmonJ.W. (1990). Corporatization of medicine: the use of medical management information systems to increase the clinical productivity of physicians. International Journal of Health Services, 20(2), 233–52.
32.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Penguin, London).
33.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (Pantheon, New York).
34.
FoucaultM. (1981). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction (Penguin, London).
35.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power, in DreyfusH.L., and RabinowP. (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York) pp. 208–26.
36.
GubaE.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog, in GubaE.G. (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California) pp. 17–27.
37.
HarperD. (1992). Small N's and community case studies, in RaginC.C., and BeckerH.S. (eds), What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp. 139–59.
38.
HarveyL.J., and MyersM.D. (1995). Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap. Information Technology and People, 8(3), 13–27.
39.
HenwoodK.L., and PidgeonN.F. (1993). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing, in HammersleyM. (ed.), Social Research: Philosophy, Politics and Practice (Sage, London) pp. 14–32.
40.
HindessB. (1996). Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault (Blackwell, Oxford).
41.
HughesJ.A. (1990). The Philosophy of Social Research, (2nd edn) (Longman, London and New York).
42.
HullR. (1997). Governing the conduct of computing: computer science, the social sciences and frameworks of computing. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 7(4), 213–40.
43.
HumphreyC., MillerP., and ScapensR.W. (1993). Accountability and accountable management in the UK public sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6(3), 7–29.
44.
JoergesB., and CzarniawskaB. (1998). The question of technology, or how organizations inscribe the world. Organization Studies, 19(3), 363–85.
45.
JohnsonT. (1993). Expertise and the state, in GaneM., and JohnsonT. (eds) Foucault's New Domains (Routledge, London) pp. 139–52.
46.
JönssonS.1991. Action research, in NissenH.-E., KleinH.K., and HirschheimR. (eds) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
47.
JönssonS., and MacintoshN.B. (1997). CATS, RATS and EARS: making the case for ethnographic accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(3/4), 367–86.
48.
KaplanB., and DuchonD. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems re-search: a case study. MIS Quarterly, 12(4), 571–86.
49.
KimbleC., and McLoughlinK. (1994). Changes to the organisation and the work of managers following the introduction of an integrated information system, in ManseilR. (ed.), The Management of Information and Communication Technologies: Emerging Patterns of Control. (Aslib, London) pp 157–77.
50.
KlingR. (1980). Social analyses of computing: theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 12(1), 61–110.
51.
KnightsD. (1995). Refocusing the case study: the politics of research and researching politics in IT management. Technology Studies, 2(2), 230–54.
52.
KnightsD., and MorganG. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations and subjectivity: a critique. Organization Studies, 12(2), 251–73.
53.
KnightsD., and MurrayF. (1994). Managers Divided: Organization Politics and Information Technology Management (Wiley, Chichester).
54.
KnightsD., and WillmottH. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work: from degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23(4), 535–58.
55.
LatourB. (1991). Technology is society made durable, in LawJ. (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (Routledge, London) pp. 103–31.
56.
LatourB. (1994). On technical mediation – philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.
57.
LawJ. (1991). Introduction: monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations, in LawJ. (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (Routledge, London) pp. 1–23.
58.
LawJ. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–93.
LawJ., and MolA. (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. Sociological Review, 43(2), 274–94.
61.
LeeA.S. (1991). Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 2(4), 342–65.
62.
LeeA.S., LiebenauJ., and DeGrossJ.I. (ed.) (1997). Information Systems and Qualitative Research (Chapman and Hall, London).
63.
LincolnY.S., and GubaE.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage, Beverly Hills).
64.
LlewellynS. (1993). Working in hermeneutic circles in management accounting research: some implications and applications. Management Accounting Research, 4, 231–49.
65.
LyonD. (1988). The Information Society (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
66.
MacKenzieD.C., and WajcmanJ. (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
67.
MarkusM.L. (1981). Implementation politics: top management support and user involvement. Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 1, 203–15.
68.
MarkusM.L., and RobeyD. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–98.
69.
MilesR.E., and SnowC.C. (1986). Networked organizations: new concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 28(3), 62–73.
70.
MillerP. (1987). Domination and Power (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
71.
MillerP. (1994). Accounting and objectivity: the invention of calculating selves and calculable spaces, in MegillA. (ed.), Rethinking Objectivity (Duke University Press, Durham) pp: 239–64.
72.
MillerP., and RoseN. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31.
73.
MorganG., and WillmottH. (1993). The ‘new’ accounting research: on making accounting more visible. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6(4), 3–36.
74.
MowshowitzA. (1981). On approaches to the study of social issues in computing. Communications of the ACM, 24(3), 146–55.
75.
MumfordE., and WeirM. (1979). Computer Systems in Work Design – the ETHICS Method: Effective Technical and Human Implementation of Computer Systems, (Associated Business Press, London).
76.
MyersM.D. (1997). Critical ethnography in information systems, in LeeA.S., LiebenauJ., and DeGrossJ.I. (eds), Information Systems and Qualitative Research (Chapman and Hall, London) pp. 276–300.
77.
MyersM.D., and YoungL.W. (1997). Hidden agendas, power and managerial assumptions in information systems development: an ethnographic study. Information Technology and People, 10(3), 224–40.
78.
NandhakumarJ., and JonesM. (1997). Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research. Information Systems Journal, 7(2), 109–31.
79.
O'NeillJ. (1987). The disciplinary society: from Weber to Foucault. British Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 42–60.
80.
OrlikowskiW.J. (1991). Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1(1), 9–42.
81.
OrlikowskiW.J. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
82.
OrlikowskiW.J., and BaroudiJ.J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–29.
83.
PackwoodT., KeenJ., and BuxtonM. (1991). Hospitals in Transition: The Resource Management Experiment (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
84.
PettigrewA.M. (1972). Information control as a power resource. Sociology, 6(2), 187–204.
85.
PfefferJ. (1994). Managing with Power (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts).
86.
PutmanL.L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: an alternative to functionalism, in PutnamL.L., and PacanowskyM.E. (eds), Communication and Organizations: An Interpretive Approach (Sage, Beverly Hills) pp. 31–54.
87.
ReesS. (1995). The fraud and the fiction, in ReesS., and RodleyG. (eds), The Human Costs of Managerialism: Advocating the Recovery of Humanity (Pluto Press, Liechhardt, NSW) pp. 15–27.
88.
RockartJ.F., and ShortJ.E. (1991). The networked organization and the management of interdependence, in Scott MortonM. (ed.), The Corporation of the 1990s (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
89.
RoseN., and MillerP. (1992). Political power beyond the State: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.
90.
ScarbroughH., and CorbettJ.M. (1992). Technology and Organization: Power, Meaning and Design (Routledge, London).
91.
Scott MortonM. (ed.) (1991). The Corporation of the 1990s (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
92.
SewellG., and WilkinsonB. (1992). ‘Someone to watch over me’: surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2), 271–89.
93.
ThomasJ. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography (Sage, Newbury Park, California).
94.
TinkerT. (1998). Hamlet without the prince: the ethnographic turn in information systems research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(1), 13–33.
95.
TinkerT., and YuthasK. (1994). Social change and theoretical structures in MIS. Fourth Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, University of Manchester, 11–13 July.
96.
WalshamG. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations (Wiley, Chichester).
97.
WalshamG. (1995). The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 376–94.
98.
WebsterF., and RobinsK. (1989). Plan and control: towards a cultural history of the Information society. Theory and Society, 18(3), 323–51.
99.
WebsterF., and RobinsK. (1993). ‘I'll be watching you’: comment on Sewell and Wilkinson. Sociology, 27(2), 243–52.
100.
WhittingtonR., McNultyT., and WhippR. (1994). Market-driven change in professional services: problems and processes. Journal of Management Studies, 31(6), 829–45.
