The past decade has seen the development of a perspective holding that technology is socially constructed. This paper examines the social construction of one group of technologies, systems for computer supported cooperative work (CSCW). It compares the design of systems for computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) in Scandinavia and Japan with particular attention to the influence of culture on the resulting products. Two case studies are presented to illustrate the argument that culture is an important factor in technology design, despite commonly held assumptions about the neutrality and objectivity of science and technology. The paper further proposes an explanation for why, despite similar technical backgrounds and research interests, CSCW design is conducted differently and produces different results in Denmark and Japan. It argues that, by looking at CSCW systems as texts which reflect the context of their production and the society from which they come, we may be better able to understand the transformations that operate when these texts are ‘read’ in the contexts of their implementation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BijkerW.E., HughesT.P., and PinchT.J. (eds) (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
2.
BijkerW.E., and LawJ, (eds) (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
3.
BødkerS. (1991). Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
4.
BødkerS. (1994). Creating conditions for participation: conflicts and resources in systems design. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 1994, Chapel Hill, NC, 27–28 October, pp. 13–20.
5.
BødkerS., ChristiansenE., EhnP., MarkussenR., MogensenP., and TriggR. (1993). The AT-project: practical research in cooperative design (occasional paper 454). DAIMI (Computer Science Department, Aarhus University), Aarhus, Denmark.
6.
BrownJ.S., and DuguidP. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2(1), 40–57.
7.
BrownJ.S., and DuguidP. (1994). Borderline issues: social and material aspects of design. Human Computer Interaction, 9(1), 3–36.
8.
CarlsonW.B. (1992). Artifacts and frames of meaning: the cultural construction of motion pictures, in BijkerW., and LawJ. (eds), Shaping Technology Building Society (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp. 175–98.
9.
CollinsH., and PinchT. (1982). Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston).
10.
DahlbomB., and MathiassenL. (1993). Computers in Context: The Philosophy and Practice of Systems Design (NCC Blackwell, Oxford).
11.
EhnP. (1988). Work-oriented Design of Computer Artifacts (Arbetslivcentrum, Stockholm, Sweden).
12.
ErezM., and EarleyP.C. (1993). Culture, Self-Identity, and Work, (Oxford University Press, New York).
13.
FlichyP. (1995). L'innovation technique (La Decouverte Paris).
14.
GartnerJ., and WagnerI. (1994). Systems as intermediaries: political frameworks of design and participation. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 1994 Chapel Hill, NC, 27–28 October, pp. 37–46.
15.
GreenbaumJ., and KyngM. (eds) (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
16.
GronbaekK. (1991). Prototyping and active user involvement in system development: towards a cooperative prototyping approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
17.
GrudinJ. (1991a). Interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users. Computer, 24(4), 59–69.
18.
GrudinJ. (1991b). Obstacles to user involvement in software product development, with implications for CSCW. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(3), 435–452.
19.
HakkenD. (1994). Cultural Constructions of Computing: Lessons for the Nordic Computing Project (SUNY Institute of Information Policy, Ithaca, NY).
20.
HalesM. (1994). Where are designers? Styles of design practice, objects of design and views of users in computer supported cooperative work. In RosenbergD., and HutchisonC. (eds) Design Issues in CSCW (Springer Verlag, London) pp. 151–77.
21.
HallE.T. (1976). Beyond Culture (Doubleday, Garden City, NJ).
22.
HannerzU. (1992). Cultural Complexity (Columbia University Press, New York).
23.
HeatonL. (1997). Culture in design: the case of computer supported cooperative work. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Universite de Montréal, Montreal.
24.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
25.
IshiiH. (1990). TeamWorkStation: towards a seamless shared workspace. Proceedings of CSCW'90. Portland, Oregon. ACM, New York, pp. 13–26.
26.
IshiiH, and MiyakeN. (1991). Toward an open shared workspace: computer video fusion approach of Team-Workstation. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 37–50.
27.
IshiiH., KobayashiM., and GrudinJ. (1993). Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: clearboard design and experiments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 11(4), 349–375.
28.
JacksonM.H. (1996). The meaning of ‘communication technology’: the technology-context scheme, in BurlesonB. R. (ed.), Communication Yearbook 19 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 229–267.
29.
LawJ, and BijkerW. (1992). Postscript: technology, stability and social theory, in BijkerW., and LawJ. (ed.) Shaping Technology, Building Society (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp. 290–308.
30.
LemaineG., MacleodR., MulkayM., and WeingartP. (eds) (1976). Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines (Mouton, The Hague).
31.
MackenzieD., and WacjmanJ. (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got its Hum (Open University, Milton Keynes).
32.
MarkussenR. (1993). A historical perspective on work practice and technology: the case of national labour inspection service. In Begh-AndersenP., HolmqvistB., and JensenJ. F. (eds) The Computer as Medium (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
33.
MogensenP.H. (1994). Challenging practice: an approach to cooperative analysis. Unpublished PhD, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
34.
MouerR., and SugimotoY. (1986). Images of Japanese Society: A Study in the Social Construction of Reality (KPI Ltd, London).
35.
OkadaK., MaedaF., IchikawaaY., and MatsushitaY. (1994). Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design. Proceedings of CSCW'94Chapel Hill, NC, New York: ACM, pp. 385–94.
36.
OrlikowskiW.J., and GashD.C. (1994). Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 174–207.
37.
SandbergA. (1989). Technological Change and Co-determination in Sweden – Background and analysis of trade union and managerial strategies (Temple Press, Philadelphia).
38.
StarS. L., and GriesemerJ. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
39.
WengerE. (1994). Communities of Practice (Cambridge University Press, New York).
40.
WinnerL. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(3), 362–78.
41.
WoolgarS. (1991a). The turn to technology in social studies of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(1), 20–50.
