This paper describes a new kind of risk with which managers are now confronted. This is the risk that arises from their rapid response to new, often untested, ideas that are offered to the management community and eagerly accepted by it.
I am aware that humanity
Is approaching a crisis
In which its residual ignorance, shortsightedness
And circumstance-biased viewpoints
May dominate
Thus carrying humanity
Beyond the point of no return.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnesB. (1982). T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. (Macmillan, London).
2.
BarrS. (1995). Why reengineering takes so long. CFO, January.
BeaverW., and ParkerG. (eds) (1995). Risk Management: Problems and Solutions. (McGraw Hill, New York).
5.
BeckU. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. (Sage, London).
6.
BurkeG., and PeppardJ. (1995). Examining Business Process Reengineering (Kogan Page).
7.
Boston Consulting Group (1993). Reengineering and Beyond.
8.
CSC (1994). Index Survey ‘Reengineering: critical factors for success’. Information week. 12 September, 25–8.
9.
DawkinsR. (1989). The Selfish Gene. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
10.
DavenportT. (1992). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, USA).
11.
DavenportT. (1996). Why reengineering failed: the fad that forgot people in Fast Company, premier issue. January, 70–4.
12.
De MeuseK., VanderheidenP., and BergmannT. (1995). Announced layoffs: their effects on corporate financial performance. Human Resource Management, 33, (4), 509–30.
13.
DeevyE. (1995). Get rid of experts not workers. The Boston Globe. 24 October.
14.
DemingW. (1982). Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. (MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Studies).
15.
ForesterJ.W. (1972). World Dynamics. (Wright Allen, London).
16.
GiddensA. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. (Polity Press, Cambridge).
17.
GoffmanE. (1972). Relations in Public. (Allan Lane, London).
GossT., PascaleR., and AthosA. (1993). The reinvention roller coaster: risking the present for a powerful future. Harvard Business Review, 71(6), 97–108.
20.
GouldS.J., and EldridgeN. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of equilibria reconsidered. Paleobiology, (3) 115–51.
21.
HallE.A., RosenthalJ., and WadeJ. (1993). How to make reengineering really work. Harvard Business Review, 71(6), 119–31.
22.
HamelG.W., and PrahaladG.K. (1994). Competing for the Future (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
23.
HammerM, and ChampyJ. (1995). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. (Harper Business, New York).
24.
HirstP., and ThompsonG. (1995). Globalization in Question. (Polity Press, Cambridge).
25.
HovlandC., JanusI., and KellyH. (1953). Communication and Persuasion Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. (Yale University Press, New Haven, USA).
26.
KatzR. (1995). Is reengineering already dead?Quality Digest, January, 64–5.
27.
LancasterH. (1995). Reengineering authors reconsider reengineering. Discussions in The Wall Street Journal, 17, 24 January and 1 March.
28.
KleinerA. (1995). The battle for the soul of corporate America. Wired, August, 122–4.
29.
KuhnT. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
30.
LaingR.D. (1969). Self and Others. (Tavistock, London).
31.
LashS., SzerszynskiB., and WynneB. (1996). Risk Environment and Modernity (Sage, London).
32.
McHaleJ. (1973). World Facts and Trends: Where Man is Headed. (Macmillan, London).
33.
McLuhanM. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
34.
MumfordE. (1995). Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: The ETHICS Method. (Macmillan, London).
35.
MumfordE. (1996). Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change. (Macmillan, London).
36.
National Academy of Sciences (1971). Rapid Population Growth: Consequences and Policy Implications: vol. 1 (John Hopkins, Baltimore).
37.
TristE., and MurrayH. (1993). The Social Engagement of Social Science; vol. 2. The Socio-Technical Perspective. (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).
38.
WynneB. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and the public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281–304.
