A linear programming approach (Data Envelopment Analysis) is described to determine the relative merits of a set of multi-input, multi-output systems, in which more output for less input is considered good. The method is applied to benchmarks of microcomputers, and is contrasted with a multiple regression analysis of the same data. It is also argued that the essence of two opposing strategic outlooks can be captured within the method.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BankerR.D., DatarS.M., and KemererC.F. (1991). A model to evaluate variables impacting the productivity of software maintenance projects, Management Science37(1), 1–18.
2.
BankerR.D., and KemererC.F. (1989). Scale economies in new software development, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering15(10), 1199–1205.
3.
BromwichM. (1990). The case for strategic management accounting: the role of accounting information for strategy in competitive markets, Accounting Organisation and Society, 15(1/2), 27–46.
4.
CaleE.G., GremillionL.L., and McKennyJ.L. (1979). Price/performance patterns of US computer systems, Communications of the ACM, 22(4), 225–231.
5.
CharnesA.W., CooperW.W., and RhodesE. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units’, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
6.
DosiG. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, Research Policy, 11(2), 147–162.
7.
DoyleJ.R., and GreenR.H. (1991). Comparing products using Data Envelopment Analysis, Omega, 19(6), 631–638.
8.
Ein-DorP. (1985). Grosch's law revisited: CPU power and the cost of computation, Communications of the ACM, 28(2), 142–151.
9.
Ein-DorP., and FeldmesserJ. (1987). Attributes of the performance of central processing units: a relative performance model, Communications of the ACM, 30(4), 308–316.
10.
KangY.M. (1989). Computer hardware performance: production and cost function analyses, Communications of the ACM, 32(5), 586–593.
11.
KuhnT.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12.
LynchB.D., RaoH.R., and LinW.T. (1990). Economic analysis of microcomputer hardware, Communications of the ACM, 33(10), 119–129.
13.
PorterM.E. (1980). Competitive strategy (The Free Press, New York).
14.
SchonbergerR.J. (1986). World Class Manufacturing (The Free Press, New York).
15.
SilkmanR.H. (1986). Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
16.
SircarS., and DaveD. (1986). The relationship between benchmark tests and microcomputer price, Communications of the ACM, 29(3), 212–217.
17.
TomkinsC.R., and GreenR.H. (1988). An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting, Financial Accountability and Management, 4(2), 147–164.
