The paper addresses the human resource issues associated with the implementation of IT into the Production facilities of a company operating in the process industry. The primary focus of the research is a field study based on a questionnaire issued to the process workers who would be most affected by the changes. Management was initially concerned that resistance to change could pose a significant problem. In this respect there was particular concern that the age and background profile of the workforce could exacerbate any underlying tendency to change resistance. This paper evaluates the background to these concerns and illustrates how this particular organization dealt with them. The questionnaire results indicated a very low level of initial familiarity with any form of computer based technology. Nonetheless the results indicated a very positive response to the IT implementation proposals with virtually no evidence of attitudinal rigidity. In this sense, the results broadly support many of the observations revealed in the literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AehR. (1990). Does IT have technophobia? (Gap between IT and ability of US companies). Journal of Systems Management, 41, 23.
2.
AldagR.J.L., and BriefA.P. (1977). Age work values and employee reactions. Industrial Gerentology, 4, 192–7.
3.
AllinghamP., and O'ConnorM. (1992). MIS success: why does it vary among users?Journal of Information Technology, 7, 160–8.
4.
AlstonA. (1991). Decoding the business message, Manufacturing Systems, October, 24–7.
5.
BackstromA. (1986). New Technology. Economic Progress and Employment: A Trade Union View, Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association.IIRA, Hamburg.
6.
Bar-TalY. (1990). The effect of personal use of computers on employees perception of control over work, Social Behaviour, 5, 103–15.
7.
BatstoneE., and GourlayS. (1986). Unions, Unemployment and Innovation. (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
8.
BeibinE., and BeibinR.M. (1972). Problems in Adult Retraining. (Heinemann, London).
9.
BravermanH. (1974). Labour and Monopoly Capital. (Monthly Review Press, New York).
10.
BrennanL., FinnanF., and O'KellyM.E.J. (1990). Requirements for smaller companies in integrated manufacturing, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 10, 57–68.
11.
CaporaelL.R. (1984). Computers, prophecy and experience: a historical perspective, Journal of Social Issues, 40, 15–29.
12.
CaseyB., and LaczkoF. (1991). Older worker employment in the 1990's: some evidence from the Labour Forces Survey, in Fordism and Flexibility: Division and Change, GilbertG.N., & BurrowsR. (eds). (Macmillan, London).
13.
ChownS.M. (1972). The effect of flexibility rigidity and age on adaptability in job performance, Industrial Gerentology, 13, 105–21.
14.
CleggC.W., and KempN.J. (1986). Information technology: personnel, where are you?Personnel Review, 15(1), 8–15.
15.
CleggC.W. (1989). The dark side of IT a personal comment, Behaviour and Information Technology, 8(5), 399–402.
16.
ColiS. (1986). New category of phobics fear computers, Akron Beacon Journal. 6 January.
17.
CrimandoL. (1992). Technophobia easing the transition to desktop publishing, Folio the magazine for magazine management, 21, 68–9.
18.
CummingsT.G., and WorleyC.G. (1993). Organisational Development and Change. (West, Minneapolis).
19.
CunninghamJ.B., FarquharsonJ., and HullD. (1991). A profile of the human fears of technological change, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 40, 355–70.
DoeringM., RhodesR.S., and SchusterM. (1983). The Aging Worker: Research and Recommendations. (London, Sage).
22.
ElgerT. (1987). Flexible futures? New technology and the contemporary transformation of work, Work Employment and Society, 1(4), 528–40.
23.
GalitzW. (1980). Human Factors in Office Automation. (QED Information Sciences, MA).
24.
Gallup (1990). Ageism: problems of the 1990s, Report for Brook Street Employment Bureau (Croom Helm, London).
25.
HillT., SmithN.D., and MannM.F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technology: the case of computers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307–13.
26.
HowardG., and SmithR. (1986). Computer anxiety in management, myth or reality, Communications of the ACM, No. 29, 7.
27.
HupertF. (1988). User mental function decline with age?Geriatric Medicine, Jan, 32–7.
28.
KanterR.M. (1985). The Change Masters. (George Allen & Unwin, London).
29.
KearneyA.T. (1988). Computer integrated manufacturing: competitive advantage or technological dead end? (Report published by AT Kearney Ltd).
30.
LaczkoF., and PhillipsonC. (1991). Changing Work and Retirement. (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
31.
LancasterG., and MassinghamL. (1988). Essentials of Marketing: Text and Cases (McGraw-Hill, London) Chapters 5 and 7.
32.
LansburyR.D. (1987). The impact of technological change on industrial relations: an international perspective, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 8, 411–20.
33.
LeeR.S. (1970). Social attitudes and the computer revolution, Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 53–9.
34.
LoetherH.J. (1975). Problems of Aging. Sociological and Social Psychological Perspectives (Dickinson Pub. Co., Encio, CA).
35.
NorthcoteJ., FogartyM., and TrevorM. (1985). Chips and Jobs: Acceptance of New Technology at Work. (Policy Studies Institute, London), No 648.
36.
ParkerS. (1982). Work and Retirement. (George Allen & Unwin).
37.
PaulL. (1982). Research on cyberphiliacs and cyberphobiacs reveals 30% of workers fear computers, Computerworld. 5 April, p. 5.
38.
PorterM.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Chapter 11. (The Free Press, London).
39.
RhodesS.R. (1983). Age related differences in work attitudes and behaviour: a review and conceptual analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 329–67.
40.
RobbinsS.P. (1991). Organisational Behaviour. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).
41.
RojotJ. (1986). Employers’ Responses to Technological Change. Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association. (IIRA, Hamburg).
42.
RosenB., and JerdeeT.H. (1976). The influence of age stereotypes on managerial decisions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 428–32.
43.
RosenB.Z., and JerdeeT.H. (1977). Too old or not too old, Harvard Business Review, 55, 97–106.
44.
RosenB., and JerdeeT.H. (1990). Middle and late career problems: causes, consequences and research needs, Human Resource Planning, 13, 59–70.
45.
RoutL. (1982). Computer choler: many managers resist, Wall Street Journal, June, 4.
46.
RoweC.J. (1984). The development of computer systems in a brewery company: the need for broader training and a greater personnel input, Information Technology Training, 2, 122–5.
47.
Schultz-WildR., and KohlerC. (1985). Introducing new manufacturing technology: manpower problems and policies, Human Systems Management, 5, 231–45.
48.
Schulz-WildJ.H. (1990). What can Japan teach us about an aging US work force?Challenge (Armonk NY), 33, 56–60.
49.
SimonH.A. (1977). What computers mean for man and society, Science, 195, 1186–91.
50.
SproullL.S., KislerS., and ZubrowD. (1984). Encountering an alien culture, Journal of Social Issues, 40, 31–48.
51.
TinhamB. (1991). The real story of CIM for process control. Control and Instrumentation, October, 60–5.
52.
WillcocksL. (1991). Introduction: human resource and organisational issues in the 1990s. Journal of Information Technology, 6, 121–7.
53.
WillcocksL., and HarrowJ. (1992). Rediscovering Public Services Management. (McGraw-Hill, London).
54.
WillcocksL., and MasonD. (1987). Computerising Work. (Paradigm, London).
55.
WillcocksL., and MasonD. (1988). New technology, human resources and workplace relations – the role of management, Employee Relations, 10(6), 3–8.
