Organizations have been developing and implementing computer-based management information systems (MIS) at an increasing rate for the last 35 years. However, evidence indicates that many computer-based MIS are not as successful as they should be and many may be considered failures.
There has been much research to investigate organizational factors, individual differences, user involvement and their relationship to MIS success, and in particular, one indicator of MIS success, user information satisfaction (UIS). Little attention, however, has been paid to whether UIS for any particular MIS varies for users from different organization functions and different management levels within an organization.
This paper reports the results of a field study of MIS in different organizations in Australia which investigates the relationship between type of user, user involvement and user information satisfaction. The results show that MIS success (UIS) varies between users of the same MIS based on their organizational function and that user involvement in the systems development life cycle (SDLC) has a significant positive effect on UIS. The significance of the effect of user involvement varies for users based on their organizational function. Technical users are less satisfied with MIS than administrative users. The relationship between user involvement and user control of the systems development process and UIS is significantly different for administrative and technical users.
AnthonyR.N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
3.
BaileyJ.E., and PearsonS.W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 503–545.
4.
BaronasA.K., and LouisM.R. (1988). Restoring a sense of control during implementation: how user involvement leads to system acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 111–123.
5.
BaroudiJ.J., OlsonM.H., and IvesB. (1986). An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 29(3), 232–238.
6.
BaroudiJ.J., and OrlikowskiW.J. (1988). A short-form measure of user information satisfaction: a psychometric evaluation and notes on use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 4(4), 44–59.
7.
BeathC.M. (1987). Managing the user relationship in information systems development projects: a transaction governance approach, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, pp. 415–427.
8.
BittelL.R., and RamseyJ.E. (1985). Handbook for Professional Managers (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).
9.
BrancheauJ.C., and WetherbeJ.C. (1987). Key issues in information systems management. MIS Quarterly, pp. 23–45.
10.
BrookesC., GrouseP., JefferyD., and LawrenceM. (1982). Information Systems Design (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
11.
CerulloM.J. (1980). Information systems success factors. Journal of Systems Management, 31(12), 10–19.
12.
CheneyP.H., and DicksonG.W. (1982). Organisational characteristics and information systems: an exploratory investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 170–184.
13.
CulnanM.J. (1983). Environmental scanning: the effects of task complexity and source accessibility on information gathering behaviour. Decision Sciences, 14(2), 194–206.
14.
CyertR.M., and MarchJ.G. (1963). A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
15.
DamanpourF., and EvanW.M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of ‘organizational lag’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392–409.
16.
DavisG.B., and OlsonM.H. (1985). Management Information Systems (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).
17.
DollW.J., and AhmedM.U. (1985). Documenting information systems. Information & Management, 8, 221–226.
18.
EdstromA. (1977). User influence and the success of MIS projects: a contingency approach. Human Relations, 30(7), 589–607.
19.
Ein-DorP., and SegevE. (1978). Managing Management Information Systems (Heath, Washington, DC).
20.
EpsteinB.J., and KingW.R. (1982). An experimental study of the value of information. Omega, 10(3), 249–258.
21.
FranzC.R. (1985). User leadership in the system development life cycle: a contingency model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2(2), 5–25.
22.
FranzC.R., and RobeyD. (1984). An investigation of user led system design: rational and political perspectives. Communications of the ACM, 27(12), 1202–1209.
23.
FranzC.R., and RobeyD. (1986). Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sciences, 17, 329–356.
24.
FuerstW.L., and CheneyP.H. (1982). Factors affecting the perceived utilization of computer-based decision support systems in the oil industry. Decision Sciences, 13, 554–569.
25.
GibsonCF. (1981). Managing organisational change to achieve full systems results, in Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of SMIS, pp. 75–94.
26.
GinzbergM.J. (1981). Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: promising results and unanswered questions. Management Science, 27(4), 459–478.
27.
GlennonJ.T.M. (1978). MIS systems: the role of authority and responsibility. MIS Quarterly, 2(2), 1–6.
28.
GoodhueD. (1986). IS attitudes: toward theoretical and definition clarity, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, San Diego, California.
29.
GorryG.A., and Scott MortonM.S. (1971). Framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review.
30.
GrimmS. (1980). EDP user documentation: the missing link. Journal of Systems Management, 31(11), 15–19.
31.
HamiltonS., and ChervanyN. (1981). Evaluating information system effectiveness – part II: comparing evaluator viewpoints. MIS Quarterly, 5(4), 55–69.
IivariJ. (1987). User information satisfaction (UIS) reconsidered: an information system as the antecedent of UIS, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, pp. 57–73.
34.
IvesB., and OlsonM.H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Management Science, 30(5), 586–603.
35.
IvesB., OlsonM.H., and BaroudiJ.J. (1983). The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 785–793.
36.
JoshiK. (1990). An Investigation of equity as a determinant of user information satisfaction. Decision Sciences, 21, 786–805.
37.
KeenP.G.W. (1981). Information systems and organizational change. Communications of the ACM, 24, 24–33.
38.
KingW.R., and SchremsEX. (1978). Cost-benefits analysis in IS development and operation. Computing Surveys, 10(1), 19–34.
39.
KohH.L., and LawrenceM.J. (1988). Effects of user involvement and top management support on MIS success: Australian evidence, Department of Information Systems University of New South Wales.
40.
LienzB.P., and SwansonE.B. (1978). Discovering issues in software maintenance. Datamation, 15–18.
41.
LucasH.C. (1974). Toward Creative Systems Design (Columbia University Press, New York).
42.
LucasH.C. (1975). Why Information Systems Fail (Columbia University Press, New York).
43.
MacintoshN.B., and DaftR.L. (1978). User department technology and information design. Information and Management, 1(3), 123–131.
44.
MaishA.M. (1979). A user's behaviour toward his MIS. MIS Quarterly, 3(1), 39–52.
MedskerH.L., and MedskerL.R. (1987). Instructional technology: a key to successful information systems. Information & Management, 12, 195–208.
47.
MontazemiA.R. (1988). Factors affecting information satisfaction in the context of the small business environment. MIS Quarterly, 239–256.
48.
OliverI. (1988). Organizational power: computing specialists do have it, in Proceedings of Joint International Symposium Information Systems, Sydney, Australia, pp. 205–226.
49.
OlsonM.H., and IvesB. (1981). User involvement in system design: an empirical test of alternative approaches. Information & Management, 4(4), 183–195.
50.
PettingellK., MarshallT., and RemingtonW. (1988). A review of the influence of user involvement on system success, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 227–236.
51.
PowersR.F., and DicksonG.W. (1973). MIS project management: myths, opinions and reality, in Information Systems Administration (McFarlanF.W., NolanR.L., and NortonD.P. (eds) (Holt, Rineholt and Winston, New York) pp. 401–412.
52.
RaoK.V., and SohC. (1986). Effectiveness of computer-based information systems in Singapore: a study of user perceptions. DISCS Publication No. TRC7/86, Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, National University of Singapore.
53.
RaymondL. (1987). Validating and applying user satisfaction as a measure of MIS success in small organizations. Information & Management, 12, 173–179.
54.
RicketsJ.A., and JenkinsA.M. (1900). The Development of an MIS Satisfaction Questionnaire: An Instrument for Evaluating User Information Satisfaction with Turnkey Decision Support Systems. Discussion Paper No. 296, Indiana University School of Business, Bloomington, USA.
55.
RobeyD., and FarrowD. (1982). User involvement in information system development: a conflict model and empirical test. Management Science, 28(1), 73–85.
56.
SpechtP.S. (1981). User job technology as an indicator of information needs in computerized information system design. Paper presented at theDecision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting, has Vegas.
57.
SpechtP.S. (1986). Job characteristics as indicants of CBIS data requirements, MIS Quarterly, 10(3), 271–287.
58.
StraubD.W., and TrowerJ. (1988). The Importance of User Involvement in Successful Systems: A Meta-Analytical Reappraisal, MISRC Working Paper No 89–01, Curtis L. Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
59.
SwansonN.E. (1985). Power: a critical systems development factor. Information & Management, 9, 209–213.
60.
TaitP., and VesseyI. (1988). The effect of user involvement on system success: a contingency approach, MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 91–108.
61.
TriceA.W., and TreacyM.E. (1986). Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, San Diego, California.
