This paper was produced as the result of a research project funded by the Butler Cox Foundation. The Butler Cox Foundation is an exclusive service for managers responsible for computing, communications and office systems. It helps them to keep abreast of major developments in the technology and to identify the related implications for technical and general managers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Canning Publications Inc. (1984). Coping with end-user computing. EDP Analyzer, 22, 2, February.
2.
HendersonJ.C., and TreacyM.E. (1984). Managing End-user Computing. Centre for Information Systems Research Working Paper Number 114, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge.
3.
CashJ.T., and KonsynskiB.R. (1985). IS redraws competitive boundaries. Harvard Business Review, 63, 2, March-April.
4.
HendersonJ.C., and TreacyM.E. (1986). Managing end-user computing for competitive advantage. Sloan Management Review, 27, 2, Winter.
5.
GerrityT.P., and RockartJ.F. (1984). Managing end-user Computing in the Information Era. Centre for Information Systems Research Working Paper Number 120.Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
6.
McFarlanF.W., and McKenneyJ.L. (1983). The information archipelago - governing the new world. Havard Business Review, 61, 3, July-August.
7.
DeP., and SenA. (1984). A new methodology for database requirement analysis. MIS Quartlerly, 8, 3, September.
8.
KahnB.K. (1985). An environmentally dependent framework for data dictionary systems. MIS Quarterly, 9, 3, September.
9.
MartinJ. (1984). An Information Systems Manifesto.Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
