AlexanderCIshikawaSSilversteinM. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1977.
2.
AngstCMAgarwalRSambamurthyV, et al.Social contagion and information technology diffusion: the adoption of electronic medical records in US hospitals. Management Science. 2010;56(8):1219–1241.
3.
AvisonDMalaurentJ. Is theory king? questioning the theory fetish in information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 2014;29(4):327–336.
4.
BagnallJWhat's the difference between analogy, metaphor and simile, vol. 2016. Mountain View, FL: Quora; 2012.
5.
BijkerWE. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
6.
BijkerWEHughesTPPinchTJ. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1987.
7.
BolandRJ. Myth and technology in the American accounting profession. Journal of Management Studies. 1982;19(1):109–127.
8.
BolandRJ. The in-formation of information systems. In: BolandRJHirschheimRA, eds. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1987:363–379.
9.
BolandRJPondyLR. Accounting in organizations: a union of natural and rational perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1983;8(2-3):223–234.
10.
ChenWHirschheimR. A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal. 2004;14(3):197–235.
11.
CurrieW. Institutional theory of information technology. In GalliersRDCurrieWL, The oxford handbook of management information systems, Chapter 4. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2011.
12.
DavisFD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):318–340.
13.
DeardenJ. Myth of real-time management information. Harvard Business Review. 1966;44(3):123–132.
14.
DeloneWHMcLeanER. Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research. 1992;3(1):60–95.
15.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 1983;48(2):147–160.
16.
DubéLParéG. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(4):597–635.
17.
DwivediYKe.a.. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management. 2023;71:102642.
18.
FawcettJ. The Relationship of Theory and Research. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 1998.
19.
FlyvbjergB. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2006;12(2):219–245.
20.
FoucaultM. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books; 1972.
21.
FurneauxBWadeM. Theoretical constructs and relationships in information systems research. In: DwivediYKLalBWilliamsMD, et al., eds. Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2009:1–17.
22.
GkeredakisMConstantinidesP. Phenomenon-based problematization: coordinating in the digital era. Information and Organization. 2019;29(3):100254.
23.
GlaserBGStraussAL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
24.
GoffmanE. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday; 1959.
25.
GorryGAScott MortonMS. A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review. 1971;13(1):55–70.
26.
GregorS. Theory – still king but needing a revolution. Journal of Information Technology. 2014;29(4):337–340.
27.
GroverVLyytinenK. New state of play in information systems research: the push to the edges. MIS Quarterly. 2015;39(2):271–296.
28.
HarréR. The Principles of Scientific Thinking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1970.
29.
HarréR. The constructive role of models. In: CollinsL, ed. The Use of Models in the Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.; 1976: 16–43.
30.
HassanNR. Is information systems a discipline? Foucauldian and Toulminian insights. European Journal of Information Systems. 2011;20(4):456–476.
31.
HassanNRWillcocksLP (2021) Introduction: why theory? (Mis) understanding the context and rationale”. vol. vol. 1HassanNRWillcocksLP (Eds.) Advancing Information System Theories: Rationale and Processes, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–52.
32.
HassanNRMathiassenLLowryPB. The process of information systems theorizing as a discursive practice. Journal of Information Technology. 2019;34(3):198–220.
33.
HassanNMingersJ. Reinterpreting the kuhnian paradigm in information systems. Journal of The Association for Information Systems. 2018;19(7):568–589.
34.
HassanNRLowryPBMathiassenL. Editorial-Useful products in information systems theorizing: a discursive formation perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2022;23(2):418–446.
35.
HesseMB. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press; 1966.
36.
HirschheimRKleinHK. A glorious and not-so-short history of the information systems field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2012;13(4):188–235.
37.
HirschheimRANewmanM. Symbolism and information systems development: myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research. 1991;2(1):29–62.
38.
IngoldT. On human correspondence. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2017;23(1):9–27.
39.
IvesBHamiltonSDavisGB. A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science. 1980;26(9):910–934.
40.
KaplanA. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler Pub. Co; 1964.
41.
KeenPGW. MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition, International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Philadelphia, PA: ACM Press; 1980:9–18.
42.
KeilM. Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly. 1995;19(4):421–447.
43.
KendallJEKendallKE. Metaphors and methodologies: living beyond the systems machine. MIS Quarterly. 1993;17(2):149–171.
44.
KendlerHHKendlerTS. Vertical and horizontal processes in problem solving. Psychological Review. 1962;69(1):1–16.
45.
KleinHKMyersMD. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly. 1999;23(1):67–94.
46.
KuechlerWVaishnaviV. A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2012;13(6):395–423.
47.
KuhnTS. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1977.
48.
LachmanR. The model in theory construction. Psychological Review. 1960;67(2):113–129.
49.
LacityMWillcocksL. Interpreting information technology sourcing decisions from a transaction cost perspective: Findings and critique. In WillcocksLLacityM. (Eds.) Outsourcing information systems volume 1. London: Sage; 2009.
50.
LarsenKREargleD. Theories Used in IS Research Wiki. Provo: University of Colorado and Brigham Young University; 2015. http://IS.TheorizeIt.org. accessed November 13, 2021.
51.
LowryPBPetterSLeimeisterJM. Desperately seeking the artefacts and the foundations of native theory in gamification research: why information systems researchers can play a legitimate role in this discourse and how they can better contribute. European Journal of Information Systems. 2020;29(6):609–620.
52.
MacCorquodaleKMeehlPE. On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review. 1948;55(2):95–107.
53.
MarkusML. Maybe not the king, but an invaluable subordinate: a commentary on Avison and Malaurent’s advocacy of ‘theory light’ IS research. Journal of Information Technology. 2014;29(4):341–345.
54.
MarkusMLLeeAS. Special issue on intensive research in information systems: using qualitative, interpretive, and case methods to study information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1999;23(1):35–38.
55.
MarkusMLRoweF. Is IT changing the world? Conceptions of causality for information systems theorizing. MIS Quarterly. 2018;42(4):1255–1280.
56.
MarkusMLRoweF. Guest editorial: theories of digital transformation: a progress report. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2021;22(2):273–280.
57.
MastermanM. The nature of a paradigm. In LakatosIMusgraveA. (Eds.) Criticism and the growth of knowledge: International colloquium in the philosophy of science (Bedford College, 1965) (pp. 59–89). London: Cambridge University Press; 1970.
58.
MarkusMLSaundersCS. Editorial comments: looking for a few good concepts...and theories...for the information systems field. MIS Quarterly. 2007;31(1).
59.
MasonRM. Metaphors and Strategic Information Systems Planning, 24th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kauai, HI IEEE; 1991: 231–240.
60.
MasonROMitroffII. A program for research on management information systems. Management Science. 1973;19(5):475–487.
61.
McKeonRP. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Random House; 1941.
62.
MilesMBHubermanAM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
63.
MingersJWillcocksL, eds. Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.
64.
MyersMD (1997) Qualitative Research in Information Systems, Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, https://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz/(accessed September 17, 2023).
65.
MyersMDKleinHK. A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly. 2011;35(1):17–36.
66.
OrlikowskiWJBaroudiJJ. Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research. 1991;2(1):1–28.
67.
RivardS. Theory building is neither an art nor a science. It is a craft. Journal of Information Technology. 2021;36(3):316–328.
68.
SabherwalRHirschheimRGolesT. The dynamics of alignment: insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science. 2001;12(2):179–197.
69.
SarkerSChatterjeeSXiaoX, et al.The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: its historical legacy and continued relevance. MIS Quarterly. 2019;43(3):695–719.
70.
SartoriG (1975) The tower of babel. SartoriGRiggsFWTeuneH (Eds.) Tower of Babel: On the Definition and Analysis of Concepts in the Social Sciences. vol. No. 6, Pittsburgh, PA: International Studies Association, 7–37.
71.
SchallerRR. Moore’s Law: past, present and future. IEEE Spectrum. 1997;34(6):52–59.
72.
ScrivenM. Explanations, predictions, and laws. In: FeiglHMaxwellG, eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III Scientific Explanation, Space and Time. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1962.
TorgersonWS. Theory and Methods of Scaling. Oxford, UK: Wiley; 1958.
77.
TriceHMBeyerJM. Studying organizational cultures through rites and ceremonials. Academy of Management Review. 1984;9(4):653–669.
78.
VenkateshVBrownSBalaH. Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly. 2013;37(1):21–54.
79.
WalshamG. The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research. 1995a;6(4):376–394.
80.
WalshamG. Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems. 1995b;4(2):74–81.
81.
WalshamG. Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems. 2006;15(3):320–330.
82.
WeickKE. What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995;40(3):385–390.
83.
YinRK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1989.