GelmanA (2018) The failure of null hypothesis significance testing when studying incremental changes, and what to do about it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(1): 16–23.
5.
GelmanACarlinJ (2014) Beyond power calculations: assessing type s (sign) and type m (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science9(6): 641–651.
6.
GreenlandS (2017) Invited commentary: the need for cognitive science in methodology. American Journal of Epidemiology186(6): 639–645.
7.
LykkenDT (1968) Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin70(3p1): 151–159.
8.
McShaneBBBöckenholtU (2014) You cannot step into the same river twice: when power analyses are optimistic. Perspectives on Psychological Science:A Journal of The Association for Psychological Science9(6): 612–625.
9.
McShaneBBBöckenholtUHansenKT (2016) Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis: an evaluation of selection methods and some cautionary notes. Perspectives on Psychological Science11(5): 730–749.
10.
McShaneBBGalDGelmanARobertCTackettJL (2019a) Abandon statistical significance. The American Statistician73(sup1): 235–245.
11.
McShaneBBTackettJLBöckenholtUGelmanA (2019b) Large scale replication projects in contemporary psychological research. The American Statistician73(sup1): 99–105.
12.
MorrisCN (1987) Testing a point null hypothesis: the irreconcilability of p values and evidence: comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association82(397): 131–133.
13.
RafiZGreenlandS (2020) Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise. BMC Medical Research Methodology20(1):1–13.
14.
SenASmithGVan NoteC (2022) Statistical significance versus practical importance in information systems research. forthcoming. Journal of Information Technology.