AlvessonMSköldbergK (2009) Reflexive Methodology—New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
2.
AvisonDMalaurentJ (2014) Is theory king? Questioning the theory fetish in information systems. Journal of Information Technology29(4): 327–336.
3.
BanvilleCLandryM (1989) Can the field of MIS be disciplined?Communications of the ACM32(1): 48–60.
4.
BichlerMFrankUAvisonD, et al. (2016) Theories in business and information systems engineering. Business & Information Systems Engineering58(4): 291–319.
5.
Burton-JonesAReckerJIndulskaM, et al. (2017) Assessing representation theory with a framework for pursuing success and failure. MIS Quarterly41(4): 1307–1333.
6.
DavisMS (1971) That’s interesting!—Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences1(2): 309–344.
7.
DavisMS (1986) “That’s classic!” The phenomenology and rhetoric of successful social theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences16(3): 285–301.
8.
DavisonRM (2016) The art of storytelling. Information Systems Journal26(3): 191–194.
9.
DiMaggioPJ (1995) Comments on “what theory is not.”Administrative Science Quarterly40(3): 391–397.
10.
DrechslerAMuellerBUrbachN (2018) Making the “right” turn: Gaining paradigmatic latitude and improving paradigmatic fit for theorizing on matters of technology. Paper presented at the workshop on technology matters and matters of technology—Exploring theories of “materiality” for technology research, Portsmouth, 25 June.
11.
DubinR (1976) Theory building in applied areas. In: DunnetteMD (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 17–40.
FreeseL (1980) Formal theorizing. Annual Review of Sociology6: 187–212.
14.
GioiaDAPitreE (1990) Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review15(4): 584–602.
15.
GregorS (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly30(3): 611–642.
16.
GroverVLyytinenKSrinivasanA, et al. (2008) Contributing to rigorous and forward thinking explanatory theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems9(2): 40–47.
17.
HevnerARMarchSTParkJ, et al. (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly28(1): 75–105.
18.
HirschheimR (2019) Against theory: With apologies to feyerabend. Journal of the Association for Information Systems20(9): 1340–1357.
19.
HovorkaDSLarsenKBirtJ, et al. (2013) A meta-theoretic approach to theory integration in information systems. Paper presented at the 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2013), Wailea, HI.
20.
IntronaLDKavanaghDKellyS, et al. (2016) Introduction to “Beyond Interpretivism? New Encounters with Technology and Organization.” In: IntronaLDKavanaghDKellyS, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference on Information Systems and Organizations. Cham: Springer Nature, pp. xi–xviii.
21.
JaccardJJacobyJ (2010) Theory Construction and Model Building Skills (1st edn). New York: The Guilford Press.
22.
JonesM (2019) Beyond convergence: Rethinking pluralism in IS Research. Paper presented at the 40th international conference on information systems (ICIS 2019), Munich.
23.
KlemmerE (1973) Preface to the special issue on interpersonal communication systems. Human Factors15(5): 435–451.
24.
LarsenKRBongCH (2016) A tool for addressing construct identity in literature reviews and meta-analyses. MIS Quarterly40(3): 529–551; A1–A20.
25.
LeeAS (2014) Theory is king? But first, what is theory?Journal of Information Technology29(4): 350–352.
26.
LeidnerDE (2018) Review and theory symbiosis: An introspective retrospective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems19(6): 552–567.
27.
LeidnerDE (2020) What’s in a contribution?Journal of the Association for Information Systems21(1): 238–245.
28.
LockeKGolden-BiddleK (1997) Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. The Academy of Management Journal40(5): 1023–1062.
29.
MarkusMLRobeyD (1988) Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science34(5): 583–598.
30.
MuellerBUrbachN (2017) Understanding the why, what, and how of theories in IS Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems41(17): 349–388.
31.
NiedermanFMarchST (2019) Broadening the conceptualization of theory in the information systems discipline: A meta-theory approach. ACM SIGMIS Database50(2): 18–44.
32.
PollockTGBonoJE (2013) Being Scheherazade: The importance of storytelling in academic writing. Academy of Management Journal56(3): 629–634.
33.
PooleMSVan De VenAH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review14(4): 562–578.
34.
RaiA (2017) Editor’s comments: Seeing the forest for the trees. MIS Quarterly41(4): iii–viii.
35.
RaiA (2018) Editor’s comments: The first few pages. MIS Quarterly42(2): iii–vi.
36.
RivardS (2014) Editor’s comments—The ions of theory construction. MIS Quarterly38(2): iii–xiii.
37.
RunkelPJRunkelM (1984) A Guide to Usage for Writers and Students in the Social Sciences. Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Allanheld.
38.
SiponenMKlaavuniemiT (2019) How and why “theory” is often misunderstood in information systems literature. Paper presented at the 40th international conference on information systems (ICIS 2019), Munich.
39.
SmithKGHittMA (eds) (2009) Great Minds in Management—The Process of Theory Development (1st rep. edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
TruexDHolmströmJKeilM (2006) Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems7(12): 797–821.
41.
TsangEWKEllsaesserF (2011) How contrastive explanation facilitates theory building. Academy of Management Review36(2): 404–419.
42.
WeberR (2003) Editor’s comments: Theoretically speaking. MIS Quarterly27(3): iii–xii.
43.
WeberR (2012) Evaluating and developing theories in the information systems discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems13(1): 1–30.
44.
WebsterJWatsonRT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly26(2): xiii–xxiii.
45.
WeickKE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly38(4): 628–652.
46.
WeickKE (1995) What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly40(3): 385–390.
47.
ZmudB (1998) Editor’s comments: “Pure” theory manuscripts. MIS Quarterly22(2): xxix–xxxii.