Information and communications technology can be used to improve the social and economic situation in developing countries. However, a broad range of challenges has been identified, and one of these relates to the power asymmetries in developing countries. These power asymmetries are often deeply entrenched. We conducted an in-depth critical case study of an information and communication technology for development project in India. We looked at the historical and cultural context, the roles of the actors, and the use of symbolic practices. Using Bourdieu’s theory of practice and, in particular, his concept of habitus, our findings reveal how symbolic practices can work against ICT projects in developing countries. These symbolic practices, rooted in a particular culture, are tied to and constitutive of power asymmetries. We offer a framework for studying habitus in information systems research on information and communication technology for development that may be useful for others who wish to explore similar questions in their case study research.
AnupindiRSivakumarS (2007) Supply chain reengineering in agri-business. In: LeeHLLeeC-Y (eds) Building Supply Chain Excellence in Emerging Economies. New York: Springer, pp. 265–307.
2.
ArnholtzJHammerslevO (2013) Transcended power of the state: The role of actors in Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of the state. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory14(1): 42–64.
3.
BabaML (1999) Dangerous liaisons: Trust, distrust, and information technology in American work organizations. Human Organization58(3): 331–346.
4.
BarleySR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly31(1): 78–108.
5.
BestMKumarR (2008) Sustainability failures of rural telecenters: Challenges from the Sustainable Access in Rural India (SARI) project. Information Technologies and International Development4(4): 31–45.
6.
BetteneyMBarnardJLambirthA (2018) Mentor, colleague, co-learner and judge: Using Bourdieu to evaluate the motivations of mentors of Newly Qualified Teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education41(4): 433–447.
7.
BigoD (2011) Pierre Bourdieu and international relations: Power of practices, practices of power. International Political Sociology5(3): 225–258.
8.
BoeijeH (2002) A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity36(4): 391–409.
9.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction. Translated by RichardNice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (2004) The peasant and his body. Ethnography5(4): 579–599.
11.
BourdieuPNiceR (2008) The Bachelors’ Ball. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
13.
BrownP (1995) Cultural capital and social exclusion: Some observations on recent trends in education, employment and the labour market. Work, Employment & Society9(1): 29–51.
14.
BurchardtTLe GrandJPiachaudD (1999) Social exclusion in Britain 1991—1995. Social Policy & Administration33(3): 227–244.
15.
CarolanMS (2005) Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land: An examination of contesting social fields. Rural Sociology70(3): 387–413.
16.
ChartrandTLLakinJL (2013) The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology64: 285–308.
17.
CorbettJMKellerCP (2004) Empowerment and participatory geographic information and multimedia systems: Observations from two communities in Indonesia. Information Technologies & International Development2(2): 25–44.
18.
Department of Information Technology (DIT) (2008) Draft Report on Impact Assessment of e-Governance Projects. New Delhi, India: Department of Information Technology, Government of India.
19.
De Souza e SilvaASutkoDMSalisFA, et al. (2011) Mobile phone appropriation in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. New Media & Society13(3): 411–426.
20.
EmirbayerMJohnsonV (2008) Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society37(1): 1–44.
21.
FoddyMPlatowMJYamagishiT (2009) Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell)20(4): 419–422.
22.
GoyalA (2010) Information, direct access to farmers, and rural market performance in Central India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics2(3): 22–45.
23.
GrilloCM (2018) Revisiting from and Bourdieu: Contributions to habitus and realism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour48(4): 416–432.
24.
IgarashiTKashimaYKashimaES, et al. (2008) Culture, trust, and social networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology11(1): 88–101.
25.
JaspersonJCarteTASaundersCS, et al. (2002) Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly26(4): 397–459.
26.
LevinaNVaastE (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly29(2): 335–363.
27.
LevinaNVaastE (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quarterly32(2): 307–332.
28.
LinCIKuoF-YMyersMD (2015) Extending ICT4D studies: The value of critical research. MIS Quarterly39: 697–712.
29.
Madhya Pradesh Agency for Promotion of Information Technology (MAPIT) (2006) E-Agricultural Marketing in Madhya Pradesh. Bhopal, India: Madhya Pradesh Agency for Promotion of Information Technology.
30.
MajchrzakAMarkusMLWarehamJ (2012) ICT and societal challenges. MISQ, special issue call for papers.
31.
MayerRCDavisJHSchoormanFD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
32.
MeenakshiJVBanerjiA (2005) The unsupportable support price: An analysis of collusion and government intervention in paddy auction markets in North India. Journal of Development Economics76(2): 377–403.
33.
MolonyT (2008) Running out of credit: The limitations of mobile telephony in a Tanzanian agricultural marketing system. The Journal of Modern African Studies46(4): 637–658.
34.
MurrayJ (2007) The cycle of punishment: Social exclusion of prisoners and their children. Criminology and Criminal Justice7(1): 55–81.
35.
MyersMDKleinHK (2011) A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly35(1): 17–36.
36.
National Horticulture Mission (NHM) (2005) National Horticulture Mission —Action Plan for Madhya Pradesh. Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi: Government of India.
37.
NavarroZ (2006) In search of a cultural interpretation of power: The contribution of Pierre Bourdieu. IDS Bulletin37(6): 11–22.
38.
NoirCWalshamG (2007) The great legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector. Information Technology & People20(4): 313–333.
ParraMGDe NaldaALPerlesGSM (2011) Towards a more humanistic understanding of organizational trust. Journal of Management Development30(6): 605–614.
41.
QuahJST (2008) Curbing corruption in India: An impossible dream?Asian Journal of Political Science16(3): 240–259.
42.
RaedekeAHGreenJJHodgeSS, et al. (2003) Farmers, the practice of farming and the future of agroforestry: An application of Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus. Rural Sociology68(1): 64–86.
43.
RowlandsJ (2018) Deepening understandings of Bourdieu’s academic and intellectual capital through a study of academic voice within academic governance. Studies in Higher Education43(11): 1823–1836.
ScheerM (2012) Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory51(2): 193–220.
46.
SchoormanFDMayerRCDavisJH (2007) An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review32(2): 344–354.
47.
SinghB (2007) Whither Agriculture in India. Agra, India: N. R. Agrawal & Company, India.
48.
SongF (2009) Intergroup trust and reciprocity in strategic interactions: Effects of group decision-making mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes108(1): 164–173.
49.
SwartzD (1996) Bridging the study of culture and religion: Pierre Bourdieu’s political economy of symbolic power. Sociology of Religion57(1): 71–85.
50.
SwartzD (1997) Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. London: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd.
51.
Van der PloegJD (2012) Poverty alleviation and smallholder agriculture: The rural poverty report 2011. Development and Change43(1): 439–448.
52.
VasanS (2007) Timber access in the Indian Himalaya: Rethinking social capital in public policy. Journal of Development Studies43(7): 1215–1233.
53.
WacquantL (2013) Symbolic power and group-making: On Pierre Bourdieu’s reframing of class. Journal of Classical Sociology13(2): 274–291.
54.
WacquantL (2018) Four transversal principles for putting Bourdieu to work. In: MedvetzTSallazJJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 645–653.
55.
WalshamG (2020) Health information systems in developing countries: Some reflections on information for action. Information Technology for Development26(1): 194–200.
56.
WalshamGSahayS (2006) Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects. Information Technology for Development12(1): 7–24.
57.
YosanoAHayashiN (2005) Social stratification, intermediary groups and creation of trustfulness. Sociological Theory and Methods20(1): 27–44.
58.
ZembylasM (2007) Emotional capital and education: Theoretical insights from Bourdieu. British Journal of Educational Studies55(4): 443–463.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
