BenbasatIGoldsteinDKMeadM (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly11(3): 369–386.
2.
BhattacherjeeA (2012) Social Science Research. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
3.
BoellSKCecez-KecmanovicD (2015) On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews: Prescriptions, presumptions, pretense and perils. Journal of Information Technology30(2): 161–173.
4.
BurrellGMorganG (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. London: Heinemann.
5.
Cecez-KecmanovicDDavisonRMFernandezW, et al. (2020) Advancing qualitative IS research methodologies: Expanding horizons and seeking new paths. Journal of the Association for Information Systems21(1): 1.
6.
DubeLPareG (2003) Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly27(4): 597–635.
7.
Godfrey-SmithP (2003) Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
HirschheimR (1985) Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. In: MumfordE (ed.) Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 13–35.
9.
HirschheimRKleinHK (2012) A glorious and not-so-short history of the information systems field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems13(4): 188–235.
10.
KaganJ (2009) The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
KleinHKMyersMD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly23(1): 67–93.
12.
KuhnTS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edn). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
13.
LeeASHubonaGS (2009) A scientific basis for rigor in information systems research. MIS Quarterly33(2): 237–262.
14.
McBrideN (2018) Is information systems a science?Communications of the Association of Information Systems43(1): 163–174.
15.
MannheimK (1936) Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.
16.
MayrE (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science134(3489): 1501–1506.
17.
MelchertN (2014) The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy (7th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
NelsonRR (2016) The sciences are different and the differences matter. Research Policy45(9): 1692–1701.
19.
OkashaS (2016) Philosophy of Science (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
OkashaS (2019) Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
PolkinghorneD (1983) Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
22.
SarkerSXiaoXBeaulieuT, et al. (2018) Learning from first-generation qualitative approaches in the IS discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems19(1): 752–774.
23.
SnowCP (1959) The Rede Lecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
SokalAD (1996) Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text46–47(1): 217–252.
25.
University of Michigan (2020) Styles of Philosophy [2020-05-16]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
26.
van FraassenBC (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
WeberM (1904) Die ‘Objektivität’ Sozialwissenschaftlicher Und Sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis [‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy]. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik19(1): 22–87.
28.
ZimmermannJ (2015) Hermeneutics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.