Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Despite anticoagulation, 50% of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) cases progress to post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). While percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) reduces thrombotic burden, optimal venous access selection (popliteal vs infrapopliteal) remains unestablished. This study compares long-term outcomes between these approaches.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 56 acute DVT patients (28 per group) underwent propensity score matching for age, sex, symptom duration, and thrombus extent. All received PMT via either infrapopliteal access or popliteal access at a tertiary center (2021-2024). Primary outcomes included PTS incidence and access site complications.

Results

Popliteal access demonstrated shorter establishment time (15 vs 22.5 min, p < .01), while infrapopliteal access preferentially utilized the peroneal vein (69.2%). No intraoperative complications; minor postoperative events occurred in 5.4% (3/56) without intergroup difference. 48 patients (85.7%) completed ultrasound surveillance (mean follow-up: 21.4 ± 12.4 months). PTS rates were significantly lower with infrapopliteal access (12.5% vs 41.7%, p = .023), with a markedly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe PTS (Villalta ≥10) in the infrapopliteal group (4.2% vs 25.0%, p = .097). These benefits were observed despite comparable residual thrombosis (70.8% overall) and DVT recurrence (12.5%).

Conclusion

Infrapopliteal PMT, with selective adjunct CDT, is associated with a lower risk of PTS compared to popliteal access, likely due to more complete distal thrombus clearance. Despite longer access times, this approach demonstrates favorable long-term outcomes and represents a viable alternative for DVT management.

Keywords

deep venous thrombosis catheter-directed thrombolysis post-thrombotic syndrome access peroneal vein

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wolf

Barco

Di Nisio

, et al. Epidemiology of deep vein thrombosis. Vasa 2024; 53(5): 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001145

Chopard

Albertsen

Piazza

. Diagnosis and treatment of lower extremity venous thromboembolism: a review. JAMA 2020; 324(17): 1765–1776. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17272

Brown

Tokessy

Delluc

, et al. Risk of developing post thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis with different anticoagulant regimens: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Thromb Res 2024; 240: 109057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109057

Kahn

. The post-thrombotic syndrome. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2016; 2016(1): 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.413

Wang

Zhang

. AngioJet thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2021; 27: 10760296211005548. https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296211005548

Liu

Wang

, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis of acute entire limb deep vein thrombosis from below the knee access: a retrospective analysis of a single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 91(2): 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27118

Bendix

Nolan

Banipal

, et al. Posterior tibial vein approach to catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019; 7(5): 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.01.064

Wang

Luo

, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis through anterior tibial vein for treating acute extensive deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2018; 6(6): 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.04.013

Jin

Feng

, et al. The below-the-knee approach to percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: a retrospective single-centre, single-arm study. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 30(1): 24-00015. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00015

10.

Porter

Moneta

. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International consensus committee on chronic venous disease. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21(4): 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70195-8

11.

Prandoni

Lensing

Prins

, et al. Residual venous thrombosis as a predictive factor of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137(12): 955–960. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-12-200212170-00008

12.

Kahn

Julian

Kearon

, et al. Quality of life after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for proximal deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8(1): 8–23.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.023

13.

Tian

Han

Sun

, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relative safety and efficacy of treating lower extremity deep vein thrombosis via pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis. Vascular 2024; 33: 17085381241274556. https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241274556

14.

Zeng

Min

Chen

, et al. Calf deep veins are safe and feasible accesses for the endovascular treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Sci Rep 2024; 14(1): 12916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63782-6

15.

Yang

Gao

, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis via small saphenous veins for treating acute deep venous thrombosis. Med Sci Monit 2016; 22: 2972–2980. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.897016

16.

Enden

Sandvik

Kløw

, et al. Catheter-directed venous thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis--the CaVenT study: rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial (NCT00251771). Am Heart J 2007; 154(5): 808–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.010

17.

Haig

Enden

Grøtta

, et al. Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol 2016; 3(2): e64–e71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00248-3

18.

Vedantham

Goldhaber

Julian

, et al. Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 12 07 2017; 377(23): 2240–2252. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615066

19.

Kahn

. The post-thrombotic syndrome: progress and pitfalls. Br J Haematol 2006; 134(4): 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06200.x

20.

Avgerinos

Black

van Rijn

, et al. The role and principles of stenting in acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12(5): 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101868

21.

Armon

Whitaker

Tennant

. Catheter-directed thrombolysis of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. A new approach via the posterior tibial vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 13(4): 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80086-x

22.

Lee

Hur

, et al. Anatomical consideration of deep calf veins: application to catheter-directed thrombolysis. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43(12): 2071–2076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02821-7

Long-term outcomes of infrapopliteal versus popliteal venous access for percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in acute deep vein thrombosis: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References