Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-3
“Comparing sub-bandage pressure and stiffness dynamics in two two-component compression systems for the lower limb: Influence of skill level and partial compression layer addition”
Two-component cohesive compression systems are available for compression therapy.
Objectives
To assess the sub-bandage pressure and stiffness of the two-component compression systems, Coban and CoFlex, and to investigate how an additional partial compression layer after two hours and the experience of the therapist impact these outcomes.
Methods
The study examined 19 patients whose lower limbs were bandaged by either a trainee or an experienced physical therapist. Sub-bandage pressures were measured using PicoPress® sensors placed 10 cm and 25 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. Additionally, the Static Stiffness Index (SSI) and Dynamic Stiffness Index (DSI) were calculated.
Results
The addition of a partial compression layer on the ventral side of the leg significantly increased sub-bandage pressure and DSI. SSI effects were significant at 10 cm, but not at 25 cm height. Coban generated significantly higher pressures than CoFlex, while the level of experience of the therapist showed no significant influence.
Conclusions
The addition of a partial compression layer effectively increases sub-bandage pressure, with Coban exerting higher pressure than CoFlex. However, the level of experience of the therapist does not significantly influence the compression outcomes.
PartschH. Compression therapy: clinical and experimental evidence. Ann Vasc Dis2012; 5: 416–422. DOI: 10.3400/avd.ra.12.00068.
2.
Executive Committee of the International Society of L. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 consensus document of the international society of lymphology. Lymphology2020; 53: 3–19.
3.
BadgerCMPeacockJLMortimerPS. A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial comparing multilayer bandaging followed by hosiery versus hosiery alone in the treatment of patients with lymphedema of the limb. Cancer2000; 88: 2832–2837.
4.
DamstraRJBrouwerERPartschH. Controlled, comparative study of relation between volume changes and interface pressure under short-stretch bandages in leg lymphedema patients. Dermatol Surg2008; 34: 773–778. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34145.x.
5.
GebruersNHendriksJMHTjalmaW, et al.Pressure curves, static and dynamic stiffness of different two-component compression systems for the treatment of chronic edema of the lower limbs. Lymphat Res Biol2022; 20: 335–341. DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0016.
6.
FranksPJMoffattCJMurrayS, et al.Evaluation of the performance of a new compression system in patients with lymphoedema. Int Wound J2013; 10: 203–209. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00958.x.
7.
MoffattCJFranksPJHardyD, et al.A preliminary randomized controlled study to determine the application frequency of a new lymphoedema bandaging system. Br J Dermatol2012; 166: 624–632. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10731.x.
8.
GokaEAPokuEThokalaP, et al.Clinical and economic impact of a two-layer compression system for the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. Wounds2020; 32: 11–21.
9.
SchurenJBernatchezSFTuckerJ, et al.3M coban 2 layer compression therapy: intelligent compression dynamics to suit different patient needs. Adv Wound Care2012; 1: 255–258. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2011.0283.
10.
SmithGSimonDMcDermottE, et al.Incorporating novel solutions to lower-limb problems into compression formularies. Br J Community Nurs2014; Suppl(Suppl): S37–S44. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2014.19.Sup6.S37.
11.
GuestJFFullerGWVowdenP. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of three different compression systems in newly-diagnosed venous leg ulcers in the UK. J Wound Care2017; 26: 244–254. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.5.244.
12.
Torres-LacombaMNavarro-BrazalezBPrieto-GomezV, et al.Effectiveness of four types of bandages and kinesio-tape for treating breast-cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomized, single-blind, clinical trial. Clin Rehabil2020; 34: 1230–1241. DOI: 10.1177/0269215520935943.
13.
KellerAMullerMLCalowT, et al.Bandage pressure measurement and training: simple interventions to improve efficacy in compression bandaging. Int Wound J2009; 6: 324–330. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00621.x.
14.
TidharDKerenEBrandinG, et al.Effectiveness of compression bandaging education for wound care nurses. J Wound Care2017; 26: 625–631. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.11.625.
15.
CuschieriS. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth2019; 13: S31–S34. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.
16.
von ElmEAltmanDEggerM, et al.The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
17.
PartschH. The static stiffness index: a simple method to assess the elastic property of compression material in vivo. Dermatol Surg2005; 31: 625–630. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31604.
18.
DamstraRJHalkABDutch Working Group on Lymphedema. The Dutch lymphedema guidelines based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and the chronic care model. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2017; 5: 756–765. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.04.012.
19.
SikkaMPGhoshSMukhopadhyayA. Mathematical modeling to predict the sub-bandage pressure on a conical limb for multi-layer bandaging. Med Eng Phys2016; 38: 917–921. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.05.006.
20.
ToddM. Compression bandaging: types and skills used in practical application. Br J Nurs2011; 20: 681–682. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2011.20.11.681.
21.
PartschHDamstraRJMostiG. Dose finding for an optimal compression pressure to reduce chronic edema of the extremities. Int Angiol2011; 30: 527–533.
22.
PartschHSchurenJMostiG, et al.The Static Stiffness Index: an important parameter to characterise compression therapy in vivo. J Wound Care2016; 25 Suppl 9(Suppl 9): S4–S10. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup9.S4.
23.
van der Wegen-FrankenCPTankBNijstenT, et al.Changes in the pressure and the dynamic stiffness index of medical elastic compression stockings after having been worn for eight hours: a pilot study. Phlebology2009; 24: 31–37. DOI: 10.1258/phleb.2008.008037.
24.
ProtzKHeyerKDorlerM, et al.Compression therapy: scientific background and practical applications. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges2014; 12: 794–801. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12405.
25.
BrijkerFHeijdraYVan Den ElshoutF, et al.Volumetric measurements of peripheral oedema in clinical conditions. Clin Physiol2000; 20: 56–61. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00224.x.
