Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic vein insufficiency,a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic vein insufficiency (PVI).

Results

Seven studies comprised of 802 patients were included. Of these studies, 5 utilised transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), 1 utilised transabdominal ultrasound (TAU) and 1 utilised both ultrasounds as diagnostic tool .The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.96 and 0.84 respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for TVU were 0.96 and 0.86. The pooled sensitivities between studies employing a <7 mm cutoff in pelvic veins’ diameter (PVD) and those employing a >7 mm threshold were 0.99 and 0.94 while the pooled specificities were 0.75 and 0.96 respectively.

Conclusion

The evidence supports the efficacy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of PVI. A threshold of up to 6 mm in PVD yielded excellent sensitivity outcomes, but it is at the expense of specificity. This meta analysis suggests that a PVD threshold of 7 mm should be employed as a cutoff point in the diagnosis of PVI, displaying both excellent sensitivity and specificity outcomes.

Keywords

Pelvic vein insufficiency vascular ultrasound varicose veis pelvic congestion syndrome

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beard

Reginald

Wadsworth

. Clinical features of women with chronic lower abdominal pain and pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95(02): 153–161.

Phillips

Deipolyi

Hesketh

, et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome: etiology of pain, diagnosis, and clinical management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25(05): 725–733.

Ganeshan

Upponi

Hon

, et al. Chronic pelvic pain due to pelvic congestion syndrome: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30(06): 1105–1111.

Daniels

Gray

Hills

, et al. Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009; 302(9): 955–961. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1268.

Perry

. Current concepts of pelvic congestion and chronic pelvic pain. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2001; 5(2): 105.

Raffetto

Qiao

Beauregard

, et al. Estrogen receptor-mediated enhancement of venous relaxation in female rat: implications in sex-related differences in varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51(4): 972–981.

Richet

. Traité pratique d’anatomie médico-chirurgicaleE Chaamerot. Paris: Libraairee Editeur, 1857.

Beard

Highman

Pearce

, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic varicosities in women with chronic pelvic pain. Lancet; 19842(8409): 946–949.

Ahlberg

Bartley

Chidekel

. Right and left gonadal veins. An anatomical and statistical study. Acta Radiol Diagn 1966; 4(6): 593–601.

10.

Kennedy

Hemingway

. Radiology of ovarian varices. Br J Hosp Med 1990; 44(1): 38–43.

11.

Coakley

Varghese

Hricak

. CT and MRI of pelvic varices in women. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23(3): 429–434.

12.

Kim

Malhotra

Rowe

, et al. Embolotherapy for pelvic congestion syndrome: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17(2, Pt 1): 289–297.

13.

Park

Lim

, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182(3): 683–688. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820683.

14.

Steenbeek

van der Vleuten

CJM

Schultze Kool

, et al. Noninvasive diagnostic tools for pelvic congestion syndrome: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97(7): 776–786.

15.

Salameh

Bossuyt

McGrath

, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. Bmj 2020; 370: m2632.

16.

Chu

Cole

. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59(12): 1331–1332, author reply 2-3.

17.

Zhou

Dendukuri

. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Stat Med 2014; 33(16): 2701–2717.

18.

Zwinderman

Bossuyt

. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Stat Med 2008; 27(5): 687–697.

19.

Whiting

Rutjes

Westwood

, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155(8): 529–536.

20.

Taylor

HCJ

. Vascular congestion and hyperemia; their effect on structure and function in the female reproductive system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949; 57: 211–230.

21.

Ahangari

. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician 2014; 17: E141–E147.

22.

Garcia-Jimenez

Valero

Borrero

, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography predictive model for the detection of pelvic congestion syndrome. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13(6): 3735–3746.

23.

DeMarco

Bortecen

Rotgans

, et al. A simple clinical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic congestion Syndrome2021.

24.

Gavrilov

Vasilyev

Moskalenko

, et al. Diagnostic value of pelvic venography in female patients with pelvic varicose veins and vulvar varicosities. Int Angiol 2020; 39(6): 452–460.

25.

Malgor

Adrahtas

Spentzouris

, et al. The role of duplex ultrasound in the workup of pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2014; 2(1): 34–38.

26.

Barros

Perez

Zandonade

, et al. Evaluation of pelvic varicose veins using color Doppler ultrasound: comparison of results obtained with ultrasound of the lower limbs, transvaginal ultrasound, and phlebography. Journal Vascular Brasileiro 2010; 9: 15–23.

27.

Otero

Pozo

Ezpeleta

, et al. Découvertes de l’écho-Doppler couleur dans l’insuffisance veineuse pelvienne. Unité d’Angiologie et Chirurgie Vasculaire, Ruber Hospital International, La Masó, 1999, vol 38. Mirasierra, 28034 Madrid, Espagne.

28.

Osman

Mordi

Khattab

. Female pelvic congestion syndrome: how can CT and MRI help in the management decision? Br J Radiol 2021; 94(1118): 20200881. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200881.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.41 MB