Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Professional vascular societies and forums have disseminated patient information on education materials about chronic venous disease (CVD) via their official websites. While online patient education material is readily available with an Internet connection, its practical utility may be limited for patients with low health literacy.

Methods

Six readability measures were used to evaluate the patient education materials regarding CVD published by 12 professional medical societies.

Results

Patient education materials on CVD vary considerably in length among medical societies, and their comprehensibility points toward a difficult level. The mean readability score was 11.20, prominently above the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA) recommendations.

Conclusion

Our analysis of patient education materials produced by 12 professional vascular societies and forums found that all materials exceeded the recommended readability levels. The innovative section “Information for patients'' in the ESVS CVD guidelines also exceeded these levels. Improving the readability of patient education materials is essential to meet patient health literacy standards and might improve patient outcomes in managing CVD.

Keywords

Readability chronic venous disease patient education vascular

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Eklof

. Updated terminology of chronic venous disorders: the VEIN-TERM transatlantic interdisciplinary consensus document. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49(2): 498–501.

Lurie

. The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8(3): 342–352.

Salim

. Global Epidemiology of Chronic Venous Disease: A Systematic Review With Pooled Prevalence Analysis. Ann Surg 2021; 274(6): 971–976.

De Maeseneer

. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 63(2): 184–267.

Sorensen

. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 80.

San Norberto

. Readability of patient educational materials in venous thrombosis: analysis of the 2021 ESVS guidelines and comparison with other medical societies information. Int Angiol 2022; 41(2): 149–157.

Avra

. Readability assessment of online peripheral artery disease education materials. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76(6): 1728–1732.

Rabe

. Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: results from the Vein Consult Program. Int Angiol 2012; 31(2): 105–115.

Flesch

. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32(3): 221–233.

10.

Ghodasra

. The assessment of quality, accuracy, and readability of online educational resources for platelet-rich plasma. Arthroscopy 2018; 34(1): 272–278.

11.

Huang

. Evidence-based quality and accuracy of YouTube videos about nephrolithiasis. BJU Int 2021; 127(2): 247–253.

12.

Robertson

. Incidence and risk factors for venous reflux in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48(2): 208–214.

13.

Lee

. Progression of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in the general population in the Edinburgh Vein Study. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015; 3(1): 18–26.

14.

Schultz-Ehrenburg

. Prospective epidemiological study on the beginning of varicose veins Bochum Study I-IV. Phlebologie Stuttgart, 2009, pp. 17–25.

15.

Campbell

. Most patients with varicose veins have fears or concerns about the future, in addition to their presenting symptoms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31(3): 332–334.