Nitinol stents placed in iliac veins are not associated with prolonged back pain

Abstract

Introduction

Endovascular stenting is the standard of care for the management of symptomatic chronic venous obstruction. The increased radial resistive force and longer lengths of Nitinol stents have led to questions over persistent post-operative back pain. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the incidence and severity of post-operative back pain of Nitinol stents compared to Wallstents.

Methods

A retrospective review of data at the Center for Vascular Medicine was performed. Patient demographics, pre-operative, one week, three-, six,- and 12 month visual analog pain scores (VAS) for back pain, stent type, diameter, length, and vein locations were assessed.

Results

From April 2014 to November 2021, 627 (412 women/215 men) patients were assessed for the presence of post-operative back pain after an initial iliac vein stent placement. Stents utilized were Wallstents (n = 114), Venovo (n = 342), and Abre (n = 171). The most common Nitinol stent diameter and lengths were 14 mm, 16 mm, and 120 mm, respectively (p ≤ .03). The incidence of back pain at one week was 66% (411/627). VAS scores at one week and one, three, and six months post-operatively were the following: Wallstents-2.6 ± 3 (n = 66), 1.7 ± 2.6 (n = 43) 0.7 ± 2 (n = 51), and 0 ± 0 (n = 27); Abre-3.5 ± 3 (n = 130), 3.8 ± 3 (n = 19), 1.2 ± 2.5 (n = 12), and 1 ± 2 (n = 5); and Venovo- 2.5 ± 3 (n = 216), 2.4 ± 3 (n = 70), 0.9 ± 2 (n = 68), and 0.6 ± 1.7 (n = 49). There was no difference in the severity of back pain at any time point (p ≥ .99). The development of back pain was unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.

Conclusions

Post-operative back pain was observed in 66% of patients at one week. The average pain score at one week for the entire cohort was three, which declined to less than one at one month. No difference in the severity of back pain between groups was observed at any time point, and the development of back pain is unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.

Keywords

Stents deep venous insufficiency May-Thurner syndrome iliac stenting pelvic venous insufficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

O’Brien

Gillespie

. Diagnosis and treatment of the pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015; 3(1): 96–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.007.

Knuttinen

Xie

Jani

, et al. Pelvic venous insufficiency: imaging diagnosis, treatment approaches, and therapeutic issues. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204(2): 448–458. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12709.

Hartung

. Embolization is essential in the treatment of leg varicosities due to pelvic venous insufficiency. Phlebology 2015; 30(1S): 81–85. DOI: 10.1177/0268355515569129.

Daugherty

Gillespie

. Venous angioplasty and stenting improve pelvic congestion syndrome caused by venous outflow obstruction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015; 3(3): 283–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.01.003.

Phillips

Deipolyi

Hesketh

, et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome: etiology of pain, diagnosis, and clinical management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25(5): 725–733. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.030.

Meneses

Fava

Diaz

, et al. Embolization of incompetent pelvic veins for the treatment of recurrent varicose veins in lower limbs and pelvic congestion syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36(1): 128–132. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0389-x.

Durham

Machan

. Pelvic congestion syndrome. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013; 30(4): 372–380. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1359731.

Asciutto

Mumme

, et al. Pelvic venous incompetence: reflux patterns and treatment results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 38(3): 381–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.023.

Ganeshan

Upponi

Hon

, et al. Chronic pelvic pain due to pelvic congestion syndrome: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30(6): 1105–1111. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-007-9160-0.

10.

Kim

Malhotra

Rowe

, et al. Embolotherapy for pelvic congestion syndrome: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17(2 Pt 1): 289–297. DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000194870.11980.F8.

11.

Chung

Huh

. Comparison of treatments for pelvic congestion syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med 2003; 201(3): 131–138. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.201.131.

12.

Venbrux

Chang

Kim

, et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome (pelvic venous incompetence): impact of ovarian and internal iliac vein embolotherapy on menstrual cycle and chronic pelvic pain. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13(2 Pt 1): 171–178.

13.

Ratnam

Lakhanpal

Satwah

, et al. Iliac vein stenosis is an underdiagnosed cause of pelvic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2018; 6(2): 202–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.007.

14.

Lakhanpal

Kennedy

Lakhanpal

, et al. Pelvic venous insufficiency secondary to iliac vein stenosis and ovarian vein reflux treated with iliac vein stenting alone. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021; 9(5): 1193–1198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.03.006.

15.

Ferreira

Oliveira-Pinto

Duarte-Gamas

, et al. Mid-term patency of iliac venous stenting for post-thrombotic syndrome. Int Angiol 2021; 40(3): 196–205. DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04659-9.

16.

Shammas

. Worsening back and lower leg pain post stenting of the common iliac vein: is there evidence it is related to stent size? J Invasive Cardiol 2020; 32(10): E250–E253.

17.

Qiu

Zha

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of iliofemoral stenting for post-thrombotic syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 57(3): 407–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.022.

18.

Ruihua

Xin

Guang

, et al. Technique and clinical outcomes of combined stent placement for postthrombotic chronic total occlusions of the iliofemoral veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28(3): 373–379. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.11.003.

19.

Yin

Shi

, et al. Clinical assessment of endovascular stenting compared with compression therapy alone in post-thrombotic patients with iliofemoral obstruction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50(1): 101–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.029.

20.

de Wolf

de Graaf

Kurstjens

, et al. Short-term clinical experience with a dedicated venous nitinol dtent: initial results with the sinus-venous stent. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50(4): 518–526. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.011.

21.

Rosales

Sandbaek

Jorgensen

. Stenting for chronic post-thrombotic vena cava and iliofemoral venous occlusions: mid-term patency and clinical outcome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40(2): 234–240. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.04.016.

22.

Stoeckel

Pelton

Duerig

. Self-expanding nitinol stents: material and design considerations. Eur Radiol 2004; 14(2): 292–301. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2022-5.