Reducing tumescent anesthetic injection pain by topical anesthesia pretreatment among patients undergoing endovenous radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objectives

Tumescent anesthesia frequently causes the intraoperative and postoperative pain during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of varicose veins. We have to find a way to reduce pain caused by these injections. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of topical anesthesia pretreatment (TAP) on relieving needle puncture pain during administration of tumescent anesthesia among patients undergoing RFA of varicose veins.

Methods

Eligible patients treated with RFA were recruited and randomized to either application of TAP with lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) or water-based cream (placebo). The primary outcome was patient described pain scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS) at different time points during the procedure. Secondary outcomes were technical success rate, complications, satisfaction level, expense, and extra analgesia use.

Results

Sixty-two patients were randomized: 32 to EMLA and 30 to placebo. Both groups had comparable baseline demographics, CEAP classification, and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Less tumescent anesthetic needle puncture pain was found in the EMLA group (22 ± 7 vs 42 ± 8, p < .01). Pain scores of other time points were equivalent. There was less pain in EMLA pretreated area compared to non-pretreated area in the same patient during needle puncture (22 ± 7 vs 45 ± 7, p < .01), and similar phenomena did not appear in the placebo group. There was no statistical difference in complications, satisfaction level, expense, and technical success between the two groups. And no extra analgesia was used in all patients.

Conclusion

We recommend the routine use of TAP to reduce the needle puncture pain during tumescent anesthesia in RFA of lower extremity varicose veins.

Keywords

Varicose veins topical anesthesia tumescent anesthetic radiofrequency ablation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Callam

. Epidemiology of varicose veins. Br J Surg 1994; 81(2): 167–173.

Casana

Tolva

Odero

, et al. Three-year follow-up and quality of life of endovenous radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein with the ClosureFast procedure: Influence of BMI and CEAP class. Vascular 2018; 26(5): 498–508.

Rasmussen

Lawaetz

Serup

, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins with 3-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord 2013; 1(4): 349–356.

Shaidakov

Grigoryan

Ilyukhin

, et al. Radiofrequency ablation or stripping of large-diameter incompetent great saphenous varicose veins with C2 or C3 disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord 2016; 4(1): 45–50.

Goodyear

Nyamekye

. Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: Best practice techniques and evidence. Phlebology 2015; 30(Suppl_2): 9–17.

Lawaetz

Serup

Lawaetz

, et al. Comparison of endovenous ablation techniques, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Extended 5-year follow-up of a RCT. Int Angiol 2017; 36(3): 281–288.

Roos

Borger van der Burg

BLS

Wever

. Pain perception during and after VNUS ClosureFAST procedure. Phlebology 2011; 26(5): 209–212.

Firouznia

Ghanaati

Hedayati

, et al. Endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) for the saphenous reflux and varicose veins: a follow-up study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2013; 57(1): 15–20.

Cho

S-Y

Kim

Park

S-H

, et al. Effect of topical anesthesia on pain from needle insertion and injection and its relationship with anxiety in patients awaiting apical surgery: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endodontics 2017; 43(3): 364–369.

10.

Nair

Gurunathan

. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two anesthetic gels (2% lignocaine and 20% benzocaine) in reducing pain during administration of local anesthesia - A randomized controlled trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019; 35(1): 65–69.

11.

Biro

Meier

Cummins

. Comparison of topical anaesthesia methods for venous cannulation in adults. Eur J Pain 1997; 1(1): 37–42.

12.

Vasquez

Rabe

McLafferty

, et al. Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the American venous forum ad Hoc outcomes working group. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52(5): 1387–1396.

13.

De Maeseneer

Pichot

Cavezzi

, et al. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins of the lower limbs after treatment for varicose veins - UIP consensus document. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42(1): 89–102.

14.

Nyamekye

. A practical approach to tumescent local anaesthesia in ambulatory endovenous thermal ablation . Phlebology 2019; 34(4): 238–245.

15.

Wallace

Leung

Nandhra

, et al. Defining the optimum tumescent anaesthesia solution in endovenous laser ablation. Phlebology 2017; 32(5): 322–333.

16.

Moro

Serino

F-M

Ricci

, et al. Dilution of a mepivacaine-adrenaline solution in isotonic sodium bicarbonate for reducing subcutaneous infiltration pain in ambulatory phlebectomy procedures: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71(5): 960–963.

17.

Newman

Meecham

Walker

, et al. Optimising treatment parameters for radiofrequency induced thermal therapy (RFiTT): a comparison of the manufacturer's treatment guidance with a locally developed treatment protocol. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47(6): 664–669.

18.

Vivien

Mazoit

Peynet

, et al. Is lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA®) always useful for venous puncture in preoperative autologous blood donation? Can J Anaesth 1996; 43(3): 232–237.

19.

Gallagher

Liebman

Bijur

. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38(6): 633–638.

20.

Sample size for comparing two means. Available from: https://www.openepi.com/SampleSize/SSMean.htm.

21.

Pronk

Gauw

Mooij

, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing sapheno-femoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anaesthesia: one year results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40(5): 649–656.

22.

Siddiqui

Cepeda

Denman

, et al. Continuous lumbar plexus block provides improved analgesia with fewer side effects compared with systemic opioids after hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007; 32(5): 393–398.

23.

Darwood

Theivacumar

Dellagrammaticas

, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2008; 95(3): 294–301.

24.

Nandhra

Wallace

El-Sheikha

, et al. A randomised clinical trial of buffered tumescent local anaesthesia during endothermal ablation for superficial venous incompetence . Eur J Vasc Endovas Surg 2018; 56(5): 699–708.

25.

Saha

Tiwari

Hunns

, et al. Efficacy of topical local anaesthesia to reduce perioperative pain for endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Cardiovas Dis 2016; 10(4): 251–255.

26.

Strazar

Leynes

Lalonde

. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia injection. Plast Reconstructive Surg 2013; 132(3): 675–684.