To investigate and compare the outcomes of the available treatment modalities for anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) incompetence.
Methods
A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies reporting the outcomes of patients who were treated for primary AASV incompetence were included. The methodologic quality of the articles was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). A random-effects model was used to estimate anatomic success, defined as AASV occlusion. The secondary outcomes were pain during and after treatment, venous clinical severity score, quality of life, esthetic result, time to return to daily activities, and complications.
Results
The search identified 860 articles, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 609 AASVs were reported. The included studies were of poor or moderate quality according to MINORS score. The pooled anatomic success rates were 91.8% after endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation (EVLA, RFA, 11 studies), 93.6% after cyanoacrylate closure (3 studies), and 79.8% after sclerotherapy (2 studies). The non-pooled anatomic success rate was 97.9% after phlebectomy and 82% after CHIVA. Paresthesia was seen after EVLA in 0.7% of patients (6 studies). Phlebitis was seen in 2.6% of patients after RFA (2 studies), 27% after sclerotherapy (1 study), and 12% after the phlebectomy (1 study). Deep venous thrombosis and skin burn did not occur.
Conclusion
Treatment of AASV incompetence is safe and effective. Despite limited evidence, occlusion of the AASV can be achieved with endovenous thermal ablation and cyanoacrylate. There does not appear to be a benefit of EVLA compared to RFA regarding treatment efficacy. Phlebectomy shows promising results if the saphenofemoral junction is competent. Lower results are seen after sclerotherapy and CHIVA. However, studies with sufficient sample sizes of solely treatment of AASV incompetence are needed to draw firm conclusions.
Garcia-GimenoMRodriguez-CamareroSTagarro-VillalbaS, et al.Duplex mapping of 2036 primary varicose veins. J Vasc Surg2009; 49: 681–689.
2.
CavezziALabropoulosNPartschH, et al.Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs--UIP consensus document. part II. anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 31(3): 288–299.
3.
SchulMWSchloerkeBGomesGM. The refluxing anterior accessory saphenous vein demonstrates similar clinical severity when compared to the refluxing great saphenous vein. Phlebology2016; 31: 654–659.
4.
SchulMWVayuvegulaSKeatonTJ. The clinical relevance of anterior accessory great saphenous vein reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2020; 8(6): 1014–1020.
5.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. Biomed J2009; 339: b2535.
6.
SlimKNiniEForestierD, et al.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg2003; 73(9): 712–716.
7.
De MaeseneerM. What a phlebologist should know about the anterior accessory saphenous veinPhlebolymphology2019; 26(2): 66–72.
8.
RigbyKAPalfreymanSSJBeverleyC, et al.Surgery versus sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; 18: CD004980.
9.
BadhamGEDos SantosSJLloydLBA, et al.One-year results of the use of endovenous radiofrequency ablation utilising an optimised radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy protocol for the treatment of truncal superficial venous reflux. Phlebology2018; 33(5): 298–302.
10.
BushRGBushPFlanaganJ, et al.Factors associated with recurrence of varicose veins after thermal ablation: results of the recurrent veins after thermal ablation study. Scientific World J2014; 2014: 505843.
11.
JimenezJCLawrencePFWooK, et al.Adjunctive techniques to minimize thrombotic complications following microfoam sclerotherapy of saphenous trunks and tributaries. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2020; 9(4): 904–909.
12.
KeoHHSpinediLStaubD, et al.Safety and efficacy of outpatient endovenous laser ablation in patients 75 years and older: a propensity score-matched analysis. Swiss Med Weekly2019; 149: w20083.
13.
KimPSEliasSGasparisA, et al.Results of polidocanol endovenous microfoam in clinical practice. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2020; 9(1): 122–127.
14.
MerchantRFPichotO. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg2005; 42; 502–509.
15.
RaviRTraylerEABarrettDA, et al.Endovenous thermal ablation of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity: single-center experience with 3000 limbs treated in a 7-year period. J Endovascular Ther2009; 16(4): 500–505.
16.
SpiliopoulosSTheodosiadouVSotiriadiA, et al.Endovenous ablation of incompetent truncal veins and their perforators with a new radiofrequency system. Mid-term outcomes. Vascular2015; 23(6): 592–598.
17.
ThomassetSCButtZLiptrotS, et al.Ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy: factors associated with outcomes and complications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2010; 40(3): 389–392.
18.
WhiteleyMSShiangoliIDos SantosSJ, et al.Fifteen year results of radiofrequency ablation, using VNUS closure, for the abolition of truncal venous reflux in patients with varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2017; 54(3): 357–362.
19.
BelentsovSMVeselovBAChukinSA, et al.[Criteria for selection of patients for radiofrequency ablation of major venous trunks in varicose disease, short- and long-term outcomes]. Angiol Sosud Khir2013; 19(4): 177–181.
20.
BernardiniEPiccioliRDe RangoP, et al.Ambulatory and haemodynamic treatment of venous insufficiency by ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (ESEC cure): 14 years results. Phlebologie2007; 36(4): 186–195.
21.
BorsukDAFokinAA. [Possibilities of using the colibri system for endovenous laser ablation]. Angiol Sosud Khir2020; 26(2): 103–109.
22.
DavyAOuvryPGuenneguezH. The anterior saphenous veins of the thigh. Phlébologie1985; 38(2): 279–292.
23.
FokinAABorsukDA. Truncal ablation without concomitant phlebectomy: What happens with remained branches?Flebologiya2019; 13(1): 28–35.
24.
FokinAABorsukDAKazachkovEL. [Efficacy of using rivaroxaban for treatment of heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous laser ablation]. Angiol Sosud Khir2016; 22(4): 97–101.
25.
FokinAABorsukDAZhdanovKO. [Possibilities of endovenous laser obliteration of subcutaneous veins with tumescence by cold saline solution]. Angiol Sosud Khir2020; 26(1): 56–61.
26.
HirschT. Anterior accessory saphenous vein: include in the treatment in the thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein. Vasomed2018; 30(1): 22–24.
27.
KrnicASucicZ. Bipolar radiofrequency induced thermotherapy and 1064 nm Nd:Yag laser in endovenous occlusion of insufficient veins: short term follow up results. Vasa J Vasc Dis2011; 40(3): 235–240.
28.
PrinzNSelzleKKamionekI, et al.Surgery of the lateral accessory saphenous vein. Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie2001; 126(7): 526–527.
29.
RaskinVVSemenovAYKurginyanKM. Endovenous laser obliteration in the prevention of recurrence of varicose veins in the anterior saphenous vein pool. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina2020; 23(3): 98–103.
30.
ReckeALFrendelAKahleB. Operative and postoperative risks of combined interventions by phlebectomy and foam sclerotherapy: a retrospective analysis of the example of isolated anterior accessory vein incompetence. Phlebologie2017; 46(2): 75–79.
31.
ShaidakovEVPetukhovAVIliukhinEA, et al.[Radiofrequency obliteration of veins in surgical treatment of varicose disease]. Angiol Sosud Khir2013; 19(2): 74–82.
32.
AzpiazuJLLambeaRMartinI, et al.A prospective study of 1,500 cases of varicose veins treated with endovenous laser ablation with up to 1-year follow-up. Lasers Surg Med2019; 51: S54.
33.
BorsukDFokinA. The efficacy of rivaroxaban for endovenous heat-indused thrombosis treatment after endovenous laser ablation. Phlebology2016; 31(2): 29–30.
34.
BoyleEO’LearyPO’NeillLB, et al.Endovenous laser therapy (EVLT)-evolving patterns of treatment. Irish J Med Sci2013; 182: S68–S9.
35.
BushRGBushPFlanaganJ, et al.Factors associated with recurrence of varicose veins after thermal ablation: 3-year results of the revata (recurrent veins after thermal ablation) study. J Vasc Surg2012; 55(1): 297.
36.
CharitableJFRockmanCJacobowitzG, et al.A single-center experience of anterior accessory great saphenous vein endothermal ablation demonstrates safety and efficacy. J Vasc Surg2020; 72(1): e244–e245.
37.
CorcosLAloiTAlonzoU, et al.Residual tributaries are the main cause for groin and popliteal surgical recurrence of varicose veins. A retrospective and prospective study of 610 limbs. Preliminary results of a multicentre study of the Italian Society of Phlebolymphology. Phlebology2012; 27(6): 311.
38.
DarvallKALBateGRBradburyAW. Two-year follow-up after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins: clinical, duplex and health-related quality of life. Phlebology2012; 27(6): 314.
39.
ErbenYVasquezILiY, et al.Long-term saphenous vein occlusion rate after endovenous ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord2020; 8(2): 329–330.
40.
GibsonK. Cyanoacrylate closure of incompetent great, small and accessory saphenous veins without the use of post-procedure compression: a post-market evaluation of the venaseal system (WAVES trial): three month data. Phlebology2016; 31(2): 5–6.
41.
GibsonK. Cyanoacrylate closure of incompetent great, small and accessory saphenous veins without the use of post-procedure compression: a post-market evaluation of the venaseal system (WAVES trial): twelve month data. Phlebology2017; 32(2): 14.
42.
GibsonKFerrisBGundersonK. Frequency and severity of hypersensitivity reaction in patients after cyanoacrylate treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Phlebology2018; 33(1): 18–19.
43.
HaoSCoxSMonahanTS, et al.Double prepuncture as a valuable adjunctive technique for complex endovenous ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord2017; 5(4): 507–513.
44.
HirschS. Endovenous laser therapy of the superficial accessory saphenous vein. Phlebology2008; 23: 11–12.
45.
KasparS. Infrequent indications of endovenous laser therapy. Phlebolymphology2013; 20(1): 62.
46.
KasparSKasparD. Endovenous laser therapy of varicose veins-13-year Czech experience. J des Malad Vascul2016; 41(2): 138.
47.
KibrikPChaitJArustamyanM, et al.Value and limitations of postoperative duplex ultrasound checks after endovenous thermal ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord2020; 8(2): 319–320.
48.
KibrikPChaitJArustamyanM, et al.Safety and efficacy of endovenous ablations in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord2020; 8(1): 95–99.
49.
LiuHFongYFNarayananS. Anterior accessory saphenous vein-to treat or not to treat?Ann Acad Med Singapore2015; 44(10): S161.
50.
LobastovKVorontsovaABarinovV, et al.Unexpected frequency and clinical significance of nontarget superficial and deep vein occlusion after foam-form sclerotherapy. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord2019; 7(2): 305.
51.
MatarL. Modifed venaseal™ technique for treating small diameter straight veins. Int Angiol2018; 37: 76.
52.
PittaSRKandaswamyPVenkateswaranA. Early efficacy and safety outcomes of radiofrequency ablation: results from vein practice in rural academic hospital. J Vasc Interv Radiol2017; 28(2): e5.
53.
SermsathanasawadiNJieamprasertbunJPruekprasertK, et al.Factors that influence venous leg ulcer healing and recurrence rate after endovenous radiofrequency ablation of incompetent saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord2020; 8(3): 452–457.
54.
TanRLingamPLoJZ, et al.Comparison of monopolar versus segmental radiofrequency ablation in endovenous treatment of lower limb chronic venous insufficiency. Ann Acad Med Singapore2016; 45(9): S306.
55.
YangWCLinYCKungCH, et al.Four-year duplex ultrasound follow-up of trunk incompetent saphenous veins treated with high ligation and reversed catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2019; 58(6): e835–e836.
56.
GibsonKFerrisB. Cyanoacrylate closure of incompetent great, small and accessory saphenous veins without the use of post-procedure compression: Initial outcomes of a post-market evaluation of the VenaSeal System (the WAVES Study). Vascular2017; 25(2): 149–156.
KingTCoulombGGoldmanA, et al.Experience with concomitant ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser treatment in chronic venous disorder and its influence on health related quality of life: interim analysis of more than 1000 consecutive procedures. Int Angiol2009; 28(4): 289–297.
59.
BradburyAWBateGPangK, et al.Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is a safe and clinically effective treatment for superficial venous reflux. J Vasc Surg2010; 52(4): 939–945.
60.
DavisPEPhillipsJKolluriR. Use of polidocanol endovenous microfoam to improve hemodynamics and symptomology in patients with challenging clinical presentations: a case series. Ann Vasc Surg2018; 52: 176–182.
61.
ShadidNNelemansPLawsonJ, et al.Predictors of recurrence of great saphenous vein reflux following treatment with ultrasound-guided foamsclerotherapy. Phlebology2015; 30(3): 194–199.
62.
SteyaertADe LetterJLanckneusM, et al.Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with a 1470 nm wavelength laser: results of a prospective, single centre cohort study other outcome. Acta Chirurgica Belgica2014; 114(4): 256–260.
63.
ChaitJKibrikPAlsheekhA, et al.Radiofrequency ablation increases the incidence of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg2020; 62: 263–267.
64.
CorcosLAloiTGaravelloAU, et al.Postoperative varicose recurrence at the junctions. A multicentric study of 1056 patients by the Italian society of phlebolymphology. conclusive considerations. Acta Phlebologica2014; 15(2): 69–78.
65.
GibsonKMinjarezRRinehardtE, et al.Frequency and severity of hypersensitivity reactions in patients after venaseal™ cyanoacrylate treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Phlebology2020; 35(5): 337–344.
RasmussenLHBjoernLLawaetzM, et al.Randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years. Eur J Vasc Endovascular Surg2010; 39(5): 630–635.
68.
RassKDaschzerenMGräberS, et al.Construction and evaluation of a multidimensional score to assess varicose vein severity—the homburg varicose vein severity score (HVVSS). Eur J Dermatol2011; 21(4): 577–584.
69.
SermsathanasawadiNPitaksantayothinWPuangpunngamN, et al.Incidence, risk factors, progression, and treatment of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis class 2 or greater after endovenous radiofrequency ablation. Dermatol Surg2019; 45(4): 573–580.
70.
SufianSArnezALabropoulosN, et al.Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after ablation with 1470nm laser: Incidence, progression, and risk factors. Phlebology2015; 30(5): 325–330.
71.
WinokurRSKhilnaniNMMinRJ. Recurrence patterns after endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux. Phlebology2016; 31(7): 496–500.
72.
MacKenzieRKCassarKBrittendenJ, et al.Introducing endovenous laser therapy ablation to a national health service vascular surgical unit—the aberdeen experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2009; 38(2): 208–212.
73.
TheivacumarNSDarwoodRJGoughMJ. Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the anterior accessory great saphenous vein (AAGSV): abolition of sapheno-femoral reflux with preservation of the great saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2009; 37(4): 477–481.
74.
TimpermanPE. Prospective evaluation of higher energy great saphenous vein endovenous laser treatment. J Vasc Interv Radiol2005; 16(6): 791–794.
75.
CavalliniAMarcerDFerrari RuffinoS. Endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins with a new 1,540-nanometer diode laser and ball-tipped fiber. Ann Vasc Surg2014; 28(3): 686–694.
76.
CavalliniAMarcerDRuffinoSF. Endovenous treatment of incompetent anterior accessory saphenous veins with a 1540 nm diode laser. Int Angiol2015; 34(3): 243–249.
77.
ChaarCIOHirschSACwenarMT, et al.Expanding the role of endovenous laser therapy: results in large diameter saphenous, small saphenous, and anterior accessory veins. Ann Vasc Surg2011; 25(5): 656–661.
78.
Bauzá MorenoHDottaMKatsiniR, et al.Endovascular radiofrequency ablation. Effect on the vein diameter using the ClosureFast(®) catheter. Cir Esp2016; 94(6): 353–357.
79.
AurshinaAAlsheekhAKibrikP, et al. Recanalization after endovenous thermal ablation. Ann Vasc Surg2018; 52: 158–162.
80.
AurshinaAAscherEVictoryJ, et al.Clinical correlation of success and acute thrombotic complications of lower extremity endovenous thermal ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphatic Disord2018; 6(1): 25–30.
81.
ErbenYVasquezILiY, et al.A multi-institutional review of endovenous thermal ablation of the saphenous vein finds male sex and use of anticoagulation are predictors of long-term failure. Phlebology2020; 36(4): 283–289.
82.
YangGKParapiniMGagnonJ, et al.Comparison of cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins. Phlebology2019; 34(4): 278–283.
83.
GibsonKMinjarezRGundersonK, et al.Need for adjunctive procedures following cyanoacrylate closure of incompetent great, small and accessory saphenous veins without the use of postprocedure compression: three-month data from a postmarket evaluation of the venaseal system (the WAVES Study). Phlebology2019; 34(4): 231–237.
84.
WeaverIWeaverP. Audit of the efficacy and complications of cyanoacrylate glue embolisation to treat varicose veins in primary care. J Primary Health Care2019; 11(3): 249–258.
85.
de RoosKPNiemanFHNeumannHA. Ambulatory phlebectomy versus compression sclerotherapy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg2003; 29(3): 221–226.
86.
KrnićA. Ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy—the simplest, least invasive and cheapest method for varicose vein treatment. Acta Clinica Croatica2015; 54(2): 136–142.
87.
Maldonado-FernándezNLinares-PalominoJPLópez-EspadaC, et al.Clinical results of a new strategy (modified CHIVA) for surgical treatment of anterior accessory great saphenous varicose veins. Cirugia Espanola2016; 94(3): 144–150.
88.
FligelstoneLCarolanGPughN, et al.An assessment of the long saphenous vein for potential use as a vascular conduit after varicose vein surgery. J Vasc Surg1993; 18(5): 836–840.
89.
KabnickLS. Outcome of different endovenous laser wavelengths for great saphenous vein ablation. J Vasc Surg2006; 43(1): 88–93.
90.
ProebstleTMMoehlerTGülD, et al.Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg2005; 31(12): 1678–1683.
91.
GeierBStückerMHummelT, et al.Residual stumps associated with inguinal varicose vein recurrences: a multicenter study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008; 36(2): 207–210.
92.
EscribanoJMJuanJBofillR, et al.Durability of reflux-elimination by a minimal invasive CHIVA procedure on patients with varicose veins. A 3-year prospective case study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2003; 25(2): 159–163.
93.
NugrohoJWardhanaAGheaC. Mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation (MOCA) for saphenous vein insufficiency: a meta-analysis of a randomized trial. Int J Vasc Med2020; 29(1): 20208758905.
94.
RoopramADLindMYVan BrusselJP, et al.Endovenous laser ablation versus conventional surgery in the treatment of small saphenous vein incompetence. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2013; 1(4): 357–363.
95.
VosCGÜnlüÇBosmaJ, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of two novel techniques of nonthermal endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2017; 5(6): 880–896.
96.
OuvryPAllaertFADesnosP, et al.Efficacy of polidocanol foam versus liquid in sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein: a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008; 36(3): 366–370.
