Successful endovenous thermoablation relies on transmural vein wall ablation. We investigated the pattern of thermal spread and tissue carbonisation from RadioFrequency-induced ThermoTherapy (RFiTT) at different powers and pull back methods, using a porcine liver model.
Methods
We used a previously validated in-vitro porcine liver model. Different powers from 5–25 W were used to administer 150 J. We compared continuous and pulsed energy delivery. Length, lateral spread, and total area of thermal damage, together with any tissue carbonisation, was measured using digital analysis software.
Results
All experiments used 150 J total energy. Total thermal damage area was smaller with lower power and pulsed energy. Continuous energy caused more tissue carbonisation than pulsed except at 25 W.
Conclusion
Reduced thermal damage with lower power or pulsed energy results from cooling due to increased time of treatment. Increasing the power increases tissue carbonisation. Optimal treatment is determined by the highest power used continuously that does not cause tissue carbonisation.
NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) clinical guidelines – CG 168.Varicose veins in the legs: the diagnosis and management of varicose veins.
UK:
NICE, 2013.
2.
WittensCDaviesAHBaekgaardN, et al.
Editors choice – management of chronic venous disease: practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2015;
49: 678–737.
3.
GloviczkiPComerotaAJDalsingMC, et al.
The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the society for vascular surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg2011;
53: 2S–48S.
4.
WhiteleyMSShiangoliIDos SantosSJ, et al.
Fifteen year results of radiofrequency ablation, using VNUS closure for the abolition of truncal venous reflux in patients with varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2017;
54: 357–362.
5.
NicoliniP; The Closure Group.Treatment of primary varicose veins by endovenous obliteration with the VNUS closure system: results of a prospective multicentre study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2005;
29: 433–439.
6.
MerchantRFPichotO.The closure study group. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg2005;
42: 502–509.
7.
RaviRTraylerEABarrettDA, et al.
Endovenous thermal ablation of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity: single-center experience with 3000 limbs treated in a 7-year period. J Endovasc Ther2009;
16: 500–505.
8.
SaniogluSYerebakanHFarsakMB.Effects of two current great saphenous vein thermal ablation methods on visual analog scale and quality of life. Biomed Res Int2017;
2017: 8532149.
9.
LohrJKulwickiA.Radiofrequency ablation: evolution of a treatment. Semin Vasc Surg2010;
23: 90–100.
10.
AshpitelHADabbsEBNemchandJL, et al.
Histological and immunofluorescent analysis of a large tributary of the great saphenous vein treated with a 1920nm endovenous laser: preliminary findings. EJVES Short Rep2018;
39: 7–11.
11.
AshpitelHDabbsESalgueroF, et al.
Histopathologic differences in the endovenous laser ablation between jacketed and radial fibers, in an ex vivo dominant extrafascial tributary of the great saphenous vein in an in vitro model, using histology and immunohistochemistry. J Vasc Surg2019;
7: 234–245.
12.
ProebstleTMMoehlerTGülD, et al.
Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg2005;
31: 1678–1684.
13.
MalskatWSPoluektovaAAvan de GeldCW, et al.
Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA): a review of the mechanisms, modelling outcomes, and issues for debate. Lasers Med Sci2014;
29: 393–403.
14.
BadhamGEStrongSMWhiteleyMS.An in vitro study to optimise treatment of varicose veins with radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy. Phlebology2015;
30: 17–23.
15.
BadhamGEDos SantosSJWhiteleyMS.Radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (RFiTT) in a porcine liver model and ex vivo great saphenous vein. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol2017;
26: 200–206.
16.
Reich-SchupkeSMummeAStuckerM.Histopathological findings in varicose veins following bipolar radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy – results of an ex vivo experiment. Phlebology2011;
26: 69–74.
17.
CowplandCACleeseALWhiteleyMS.Factors affecting optimal linear endovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower limb truncal veins – a review of the evidence. Phlebology2017;
32: 299–306.
18.
ProebstleTMMoehlerTHerdemannS.Reduced recanalization rates of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment with increased energy dosing: definition of a threshold for the endovenous fluence equivalent. J Vasc Surg2006;
44: 834–839.
19.
NejmCSTimiJRRBoim de AraujoW, et al.
Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein – varying energy may not affect outcome. Phlebology2017;
32: 13–18.
20.
BadhamGEDos SantosSJLlyodLBA, et al.
One-year results of the use of endovenous radiofrequency ablation utilising an optimised radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy protocol for the treatment of truncal superficial reflux. Phlebology2018;
33: 298–302.
21.
BraithwaiteBHnatekLZierauU, et al.
Radiofrequency-induced thermal therapy: results of a European multicentre study of resistive ablation of incompetent truncal varicose veins. Phlebology2013;
28: 38–46.
22.
TimpermanPESichlauMRyuRK.Greater energy delivery improves treatment success of endovenous laser treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol2004;
15: 1061–1063.
23.
TheivacumarNSDellagrammaticasDBealeRJ, et al.
Factors influencing the effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008;
35: 119–123.
24.
TimpermanPE.Prospective evaluation of higher energy great saphenous vein endovenous laser treatment. J Vasc Interv Radiol2005;
16: 791–794.
25.
BadhamGEDabbsEBWhiteleyMS.Optimising the results of radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (RFiTT) – in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical evidence to show how a new protocol was developed. In: WhiteleyMSDabbsEB (eds) Advances in phlebology and venous surgery.
volume 1.
UK:
Whiteley Publishing, 2018, pp. 60–71.
