LurieFPassmanMMeisnerM, et al.
The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2020;
8: 342–352.
2.
LaunoisR.Health-related quality-of-life scales specific for chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord2015;
3: 219.e273–227.e273.
3.
VasquezMARabeEMcLaffertyRB, et al.
Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group.J Vasc Surg2010;
52: 1387–1396.
4.
SmithJJGarrattAMGuestM, et al.
Evaluating and improving health-related quality of life in patients with varicose veins. J Vasc Surg1999;
30: 710–719.
5.
WrightDDPatyJTurner-BowkerDM, et al.
Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) symptom diary for varicose veins: VVSymQ(®) instrument.Patient2016;
9: 335–348.
6.
GuexJJZimmetSEBoussettaS, et al.
Construction and validation of a patient-reported outcome dedicated to chronic venous disorders: SQOR-V (specific quality of life and outcome response – venous).J Mal Vasc2007;
32: 135–147.
7.
LaunoisRReboul-MartyJHenryB.Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Qual Life Res1996;
5: 539–554.
8.
Le MoineJGFiestas-NavarreteLKatumbaK, et al.
Psychometric validation of the 14 items chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire (CIVIQ-14): confirmatory factor analysis.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2016;
51: 268–274.
9.
KahnSRLampingDLDucruetT, et al.
VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire was a reliable and valid disease-specific quality of life measure for deep venous thrombosis.J Clin Epidemiol2006;
59: 1049–1056.
10.
CarpentierPHCornu-ThénardAUhlJF, et al.
Appraisal of the information content of the C classes of CEAP clinical classification of chronic venous disorders: a multicenter evaluation of 872 patients.J Vasc Surg2003;
37: 827–833.
11.
AllegraCAntignaniPLBerganJJ, et al.
The “C” of CEAP: suggested definitions and refinements: an International Union of Phlebology conference of experts.J Vasc Surg2003;
37: 129–131.
12.
Cornu-ThénardAUhlJFCarpentierPH.Do we need a better classification than CEAP?Acta Chir Belg2004;
104: 276–282.
13.
AntignaniPLCornu-ThénardAAllegraC, et al.
Results of a questionnaire regarding improvement of 'C' in the CEAP classification.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2004;
28: 177–181.
14.
UhlJFCornu-ThenardASatgerB, et al.
Clinical analysis of the corona phlebectatica. J Vasc Surg2012;
55: 150–153.
15.
KhilnaniNMMeissnerMHLearmanLA, et al.
Research priorities in pelvic venous disorders in women: recommendations from a multidisciplinary research consensus panel.J Vasc Interv Radiol2019;
30: 781–789.
16.
HumphreysMLStewartAHGohelMS, et al.
Management of mixed arterial and venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg2007;
94: 1104–1107.
17.
ShepherdACGohelMSLimCS, et al.
A study to compare disease-specific quality of life with clinical anatomical and hemodynamic assessments in patients with varicose veins. J Vasc Surg2011;
53: 374–382.
18.
CarradiceDMazariFASamuelN, et al.
Modelling the effect of venous disease on quality of life. Br J Surg2011;
98: 1089–1098.
19.
MarsdenGPerryMKelleyK, et al.
Diagnosis and management of varicose veins in the legs: summary of NICE guidance.Br Med J2013;
347: f4279.
