Ablation of the great saphenous vein with F-care versus Closurefast endovenous radiofrequency therapy: Double-blinded prospective study

Abstract

Objectives

F-care (endovenous radiofrequency, F Care Systems, Antwerp, Belgium) is a relatively new radiofrequency ablation technique for the treatment of venous insufficiency. There is a lack of published data about F-care in literature. This study aimed to prospectively compare the F-care method with conventional endovenous radiofrequency ablation Closurefast method for the management of incompetent great saphenous veins.

Methods

Between June 2015 and December 2018, 114 patients with incompetent varicose veins were treated either with the F-care or Closurefast. The pre-, intra-, postprocedural, and follow-up data of the patients were collected and prospectively compared.

Results

The average ablated vein length was 23.1 ± 4 cm in the F-care group and 26.6 ± 4 cm in the Closurefast group (P = 0.01). The average procedure time was 17.4 ± 4 min (range: 10–30 min) in the F-care group, and 17.1 ± 3 min (range: 11–27 min) in the Closurefast group (P = 0.77). The one-month total occlusion rates in the F-care and Closurefast groups were 96.2% and 98.1%, respectively (P = 0.5). The one-year full occlusion rates in the F-care and Closurefast groups were 71.7% and 90.6%, respectively (P = 0.013). In both the F-care and Closurefast groups, the venous clinical severity scores declined significantly with no difference between groups. There was no significant difference between adverse events following F-care treatment compared with Closurefast treatment (P ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions

The F-care system was as safe and fast, but the one-year closure rate was significantly lower when compared to the other method. There was no significant difference between the adverse effects of both approaches. Further large-scale, multi-center prospective studies with long-term outcomes are required to identify the effectiveness of F-care treatment modality for patients with saphenous vein insufficiency.

Keywords

Chronic venous insufficiency complications endovenous thermal ablation great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nyamekye

IKI.

A practical approach to tumescent local anaesthesia in ambulatory endovenous thermal ablation. Phlebology 2019; 34: 238–245

Goodyear

Nyamekye

IK.

Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: best practice techniques and evidence. Phlebology 2015; 30: 9–17

Subramonia

Lees

Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation or conventional high ligation and stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 328–322.

Vuylsteke

Klitford

Mansilha

Endovenous ablation. Int Angiol 2019; 38: 22–38.

Spiliopoulos

Theodosiadou

Sotiriadi

, et al. Endovenous ablation of incompetent truncal veins and their perforators with a new radiofrequency system. Mid-term outcomes. Vascular 2015; 23: 592–598.

Nyamekye

Dattani

Hayes

, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing three different radiofrequency technologies: short-term results of the 3-RF trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 58: 401–408.

Nordon

Hinchliffe

Brar

, et al. A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 876–881.

Creton

Pichot

Sessa

, et al. ClosureFast Europe Group. Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24: 220–226.

Rautio

Ohinmaa

Perälä

, et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 958–965.

10.

Healy

Kimura

Power

, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of thrombotic events following endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 56: 410.

11.

Puggioni

Kalra

Carmo

, et al. Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 488

12.

Wittens

Davies

Bækgaard

, et al. Editor’s choice – management of chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the European society of vascular surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 678–737.