Impact of UK NICE clinical guidelines 168 on referrals to a specialist academic leg ulcer service

Abstract

Background

Leg ulcers are a common cause of morbidity and disability and result in significant health and social care expenditure. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline (CG)168, published in July 2013, sought to improve care of patients with leg ulcers, recommending that patients with a break in the skin below the knee that had not healed within two weeks be referred to a specialist vascular service for diagnosis and management.

Aim

Determine the impact of CG168 on referrals to a leg ulcer service.

Methods

Patients referred with leg ulceration during an 18-month period prior to CG168 (January 2012–June 2013) and an 18-month period commencing six months after (January 2014–June 2015) publication of CG168 were compared.

Results

There was a two-fold increase in referrals (181 patients, 220 legs vs. 385 patients, 453 legs) but no change in mean age, gender or median-duration of ulcer at referral (16.6 vs. 16.2 weeks). Mean-time from referral to specialist appointment increased (4.8 vs. 6 weeks, p = 0.0001), as did legs with superficial venous insufficiency (SVI) (36% vs. 44%, p = 0.05). There was a trend towards more SVI endovenous interventions (32% vs. 39%, p = 0.271) with an increase in endothermal (2 vs. 32 legs, p = 0.001) but no change in sclerotherapy (24 vs. 51 legs) treatments. In both groups, 62% legs had compression. There was a reduction in legs treated conservatively with simple dressings (26% vs. 15%, p = 0.0006).

Conclusions

Since CG168, there has been a considerable increase in leg ulcer referrals. However, patients are still not referred until ulceration has been present for many months. Although many ulcers are multi-factorial and the mainstay of treatment remains compression, there has been an increase in SVI endovenous intervention. Further efforts are required to persuade community practitioners to refer patients earlier, to educate patients and encourage further investment in chronically underfunded leg ulcer services.

Keywords

Varicose veins leg ulcers ulcer treatment NICE guidelines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mekkes

Loots

Van Der Wal

et al.

Causes, investigation and treatment of leg ulceration. Brit J Dermatol 2003; 148: 388–401.

Herber

Schnepp

Rieger

. A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcome 2007; 5: 44–44.

Green

Jester

McKinley

et al.

The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care 2014; 23: 601–612.

Kouris

Christodoulou

Efstathiou

et al.

Quality of life in Greek family members living with leg ulcer patients. Wound Repair Regen 2015; 23: 778–780.

O'Brien

Grace

Perry

et al.

Prevalence and aetiology of leg ulcers in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 2000; 169: 110–2.

Margolis

Berlin

Strom

. Which venous leg ulcers will heal with limb compression bandages? Am J Med 2000; 109: 15–19.

Nationa Institute for Health and Care Excellence Clinical Guideline 168: Varicose veins in the legs. 2013.

Allegra

Carlizza

. Variants of functional venous disease. Phlebolymphology 2004; 45: 289–92.

Gohel

Taylor

Earnshaw

et al.

Risk factors for delayed healing and recurrence of chronic venous leg ulcers – an analysis of 1324 legs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 74–77.

10.

Franks

Moffatt

Connolly

et al.

Factors associated with healing leg ulceration with high compression. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 407–410.

11.

National Insititute for Health and Care Excellence Clinical Knowledge Summary: Leg ulcer-venous. 2015.

12.

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network: management of chronic venous leg ulcers. Clinical guideline no. 120. 2010.

13.

Royal College of Nursing. The nursing management of patients with venous leg ucers. Recomendations 2006London.

14.

Henke

Kistner

Wakefield

et al.

Reducing venous stasis ulcers by fifty percent in 10 years: the next steps. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 37s–38s.

15.

Oien

Forssell

Ragnarson Tennvall

. Cost consequences due to reduced ulcer healing times – analyses based on the Swedish Registry of Ulcer Treatment. Int Wound J 2015; 13: 957–962.

16.

Norman

Gibb

Dyer

et al.

Improved wound management at lower cost: a sensible goal for Australia. Int Wound J 2015; 13: 303–316.

17.

Department for Health. Referral to treatment, consultant-led waiting times 2012London.

18.

Korber

Klode

Al-Benna

et al.

Etiology of chronic leg ulcers in 31,619 patients in Germany analyzed by an expert survey. J Ger Soc Dermatol 2011; 9: 116–121.

19.

Vowden

. The prevalence, management and outcome for patients with lower limb ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district. J Tissue Viabil 2009; 18: 13–19.

20.

Nelzen

Bergqvist

Lindenauer

. Leg ulcer etiology – a cross sectional population study. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14: 557–564.

21.

O'Meara

Cullum

Nelson

. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 21: Cd000265–Cd000265.

22.

Ashby

Gabe

Ali

et al.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 871–879.

23.

Milic

Zivic

Bogdanovic

et al.

Risk factors related to the failure of venous leg ulcers to heal with compression treatment. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49: 1242–1247.

24.

Panny

Ammer

Kundi

et al.

Severity of chronic venous disorders and its relationship to the calf muscle pump. VASA 2009; 38: 171–176.

25.

Gottrup

Karlsmark

. Leg ulcers: uncommon presentations. Clin Dermatol 2005; 23: 601–611.

26.

Mooij

Huisman

. Chronic leg ulcer: does a patient always get a correct diagnosis and adequate treatment? Phlebology 2016; 31: 68–73.