Collecting data on treatments for varicose veins: Getting the focus right

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

O'Malley

Selby

Jordan

. A successful practical application of coverage with evidence development in Australia: medical services advisory committee interim funding and the PillCam Capsule Endoscopy Register. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009; 25: 290–296.

Kunadian

Dunning

Roberts

. Cumulative funnel plots for the early detection of interoperator variation: retrospective database analysis of observed versus predicted results of percutaneous coronary intervention. BMJ 2008; 336: 931–934.

Worthington-Kirsch

Spies

Myers

. The Fibroid Registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization: short-term outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 52–59.

Campbell

. New evidence on treatments for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1037–1039.

Brittenden

. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1079–1087. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1088.

Nesbitt

Bedenis

Bhattacharya

. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7: CD005624–CD005624.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Varicose veins: diagnosis and management, www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg168 (2013, accessed 27 February 2016).

Gauw

Lawson

van Vlijmen-van Keulen

. Five-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63: 420–428.

Davies HO, Popplewell M, Darvall K, et al. A review of randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with endothermal ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Phlebology. 2016; 31: 234–240.

10.

Carroll

Hummel

Leaviss

. Systematic review, network meta-analysis and exploratory cost-effectiveness model of randomized trials of minimally invasive techniques versus surgery for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1040–1052.

11.

Lyratzopoulos

Patrick

Campbell

. Registers needed for new interventional procedures. Lancet 2008; 371: 1734–1736.

12.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Endovenous mechanochemical ablation for varicose veins, www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg435 (2013, accessed 27 February 2016).

13.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Cyanoacrylate glue occlusion for varicose veins, www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg526 (2015, accessed 27 February 2016).

14.

Patrick

Sims

Burn

. Monitoring the use and outcomes of new devices and procedures: how does coding affect what Hospital Episode Statistics contribute? Lessons from 12 emerging procedures 2006–10. J Public Health (Oxf) 2013; 35: 132–138.

15.

AT Obi, D Neal, J Almeida, et al. 3-12 VQI varicose vein registry – first six months results. AVR 2016 (abstract).

16.

Vascular Quality Initiative. Varicose vein registry, www.vascularqualityinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/Varicose-Vein-Registry-Flyer.pdf (accessed 3 March 2016).

17.

Klem

Sybrandy

Wittens

. Reliability and validity of the Dutch translated Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37: 232–238.

18.

Health and Social Care Information Centre. Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Topic of interest: A study on varicose vein treatments, April 2009 to March 2015, www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB19984/proms-spec-topi-vari-vein-ref-tab.xlsx (2016, accessed 27 February 2016).

19.

StarkNJ. Registry studies: why and how, http://clinicaldevice.typepad.com/cdg_whitepapers/2011/07/registry-studies-why-and-how.html (2011, accessed 27 February 2016).