Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein,comparing one versus two treatment cycles for the proximal vein segment

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the results of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) using one versus two 20 s energy cycle treatment in the proximal 7 cm segment of the GSV.

Methods

All patients who underwent RFA of the GSV from 1 May 2013 to 30 September 2013 in eight of our vein centers were included. Duplex ultrasound scans (DUSs) were performed prior to treatment on all patients and 2–3 days, and 1 month after procedure. Demographic data, GSV diameters, and other relevant data were recorded. Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathologic (CEAP) classification and Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs) were determined prior to ablation and one month later. Patients who developed endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) were followed till resolution.

Results

A total of 205 patients had one cycle treatment (group A) and 204 had two cycle treatment (group B). The two groups were comparable in their demography, CEAP classification, and VCSS scores. The rate of failure of ablation and incidence of EHIT were also not significantly different. The incidence of complications was low, <5% in both groups and all were minor.

Conclusion

Two cycle treatment of the proximal GSV for vein ablation does not improve the success rate of vein closure in the short term, compared to one cycle treatment. It also does not increase the risks of DVT, EHIT, major bleeding, and other complications. However, we do not know at what diameter two cycles may be superior to one cycle.

Keywords

Great saphenous vein ablation radiofrequency ablation Venous Severity Score

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Merchant

Pichot

. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 502–509.

Lurie

Creton

Eklof

. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 67–73.

Nicolini

. Closure Group. Treatment of primary varicose veins by endovenos ablation with the VNUS closure system: results of a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 433–433.

Proebstle

Vago

Alm

. Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 151–156.

Creton

Pichot

Sessa

. ClosureFast Europe Group. Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation carried out with ClosureFast procedure: result at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24: 360–366.

Labropoulos

Tiongson

Pryor

. Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 793–798.

Kistner

Eklof

Masuda

. Diagnosis of chronic venous disease of the lower extremities: the “CEAP” classification. Mayo Clinic Proc 1996; 71: 338–345.

Rutherford

Padberg

Jr Comerota

. Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vassc Surg 2000; 31: 1307–1311.

Kabnick LS, Agis HS, Moritz M, et al. Endovenous heat induced thrombus (EHIT) following endovenous vein obliteration: to treat or not to treat. A new thrombotic classification. In: 3rd international vein congress, 2005. Miami, FL, 14–16 April 2005.

10.

Sufian

Arnez

Labropoulos

. Incidence, progression and risk factors for endovenous heat induced thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lym Dis 2013; 1: 159–164.

11.

Lawrence

Chandra

. Classification of proximal endovenous closure levels and treatment algorithm. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 388–393.

12.

Haqqani

Vasillu

O’donnell

. Great saphenous vein patency and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous thermal ablation with modified catheter tip positioning. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 10S–17S.

13.

Zaniga

Hingorani

Asher

. Short-term outcome analysis of radiofrequency ablation using ClosurePlus vs ClosureFast catheters in the treatment in the treatment of incompetent great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 1048–1051.

14.

Mendoza E, Blattler W and Amsler F. Great saphenous vein diameter at the saphenofemoral junction and proximal thigh as parameters of venous disease class. 2013; 45: 76–83.

15.

Lutsenko MM, Ovsyanitskaya MA and Sokolov AL. RFA – better results with higher energy. In: Presented at the 15th meeting of the European venous forum, Paris, France, 2014, pp.40.