Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after ablation with 1470 nm laser: Incidence,progression,and risk factors

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the incidence of heat-induced thrombosis, its progression and risk factors that may contribute to its formation after endovenous laser ablation.

Methods

This was a prospective evaluation of all patients who had endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein, accessory saphenous vein, and small saphenous vein using 1470 nm wavelength laser, from March 2010 to September 2011. All patients who developed endovenous heat-induced thrombosis at the saphenofemoral junction or at the saphenopopliteal junction were included. Demographic data, history of venous thrombosis, body mass index, vein diameter, reflux time, catheter tip position, endovenous heat-induced thrombosis progression, number of phlebectomies, and venous clinical severity scores were analyzed. Duplex ultrasound was done in all patients preoperatively, and 2–3 days postoperatively.

Results

Endovenous laser ablation was performed in 2168 limbs. Fifty-seven percent had great saphenous vein, 13% accessory saphenous vein, and 30% small saphenous vein ablation. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis was developed in 18 limbs (12 at saphenofemoral junction and six at saphenopopliteal junction) for an incidence of 0.9%. Eight were class 1 and 10 were > class 2. No pulmonary embolism was reported. The percentage of men with endovenous heat-induced thrombosis was higher compared to those without (39% vs. 24%, p = .14). The median age for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients was 59.6 compared to non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (p = .021). Great saphenous vein/accessory saphenous vein diameter for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients was 8.0 mm versus 6.3 mm for non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients (p = .014), and for small saphenous vein it was 5.7 mm versus 4.5 mm (p = .16). Multiple concomitant phlebectomies were performed in 55.6% of the endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients compared to 37% in non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (p = .001). All other parameters were similar between endovenous heat-induced thrombosis and non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis group. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis resolution occurred in 16 cases at 2–4 but two cases progressing from class 1 to 2, before resolution. The mean VCSS score for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients preoperatively was 5.6 and improved to 2.8 (p = .003) at one month.

Conclusion

Risk factors associated with endovenous heat-induced thrombosis formation after endovenous laser ablation include: vein size, age, and multiple phlebectomies. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis resolves in 2–4 weeks in most patients but it may worsen in few.

Keywords

Chronic venous insufficiency complications endovenous laser treatment deep vein thrombosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almeida

Kaufman

Gockeritz

. Radio frequency endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVER Study). JVIR 2009; 20: 752–759.

Lurie

Creton

Eklof

. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2005; 29: 67–73.

Merchant

Pichot

. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 502–509.

Sufian

Arnez

Labropoulos

. Incidence, progression, and risk factors for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation. J Vasc Surg: Venous Lym Dis 2013; 1: 159–165.

Kabnick

. Complications of endovenous therapies: statistics and treatment. Vascular 2006; 14: S31–S32.

Kabnick LS, Agis H, Moritz M, et al. Endovenous heat induced thrombus (EHIT) following endovenous vein obliteration; to treat or not to treat. A new thrombotic classification. In: 3rd international vein congress; 2005. Miami, FL, 14–16 April 2005.

Labropoulos

Tiongson

Pryor

. Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 793–798.

Lawrence

Chandra

. Classification of proximal endovenous closure levels and treatment algorithm. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 388–393.

Marsh

Price

Hodstock

. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous thermoablation techniques: rates of endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) and classical DVT after radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation in a single centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 521–527.

10.

Rhee

Cantelman

Conrad

. Factors influencing the incidence of heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 43: 207–212.

11.

Lurie

Kistner

. Pretreatment elevated D-dimer levels without systemic inflammatory response are associated with thrombotic complications of thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg: Venous Lym Dis 2013; 1: 154–158.

12.

Schwarz

von Hodenber

Furtwangler

. Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins with the 1470-nm diode laser. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51: 1474–1478.

13.

Doganci

Demirkilic

. Comparison of 980 nm laser and bare-tip fiber with 1470 n laser and radial fiber in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 254–290.

14.

Mozes

Kalra

Carmo

. Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 130–135.

15.

Haqqani

Vasiliu

O’Donnell

. Great saphenous vein patency and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis ate endovenous thermal ablation with modified catheter tip positioning. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 10S–7S.