Haematocrit measurements during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: comparison of three stat methods with a blood cell counter

Abstract

Monitoring packed cell volume (PCV) is essential to safeguard oxygen delivery to the tissues during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared the results obtained using a PCV monitor, a blood gas analyser and a microcentrifuge with those from a laboratory-based automated blood cell counter. PCV was measured in 221 samples of 40 patients undergoing open-heart surgery. The limits of agreement (mean difference ± 2 SD) was unacceptably wide when the results obtained with the PCV monitor and the blood gas analyser were compared with those of the automated blood cell counter. This was most pronounced when PCV was measured in low concentration samples. The microcentrifuge showed good limits of agreement regardless of sample concentration.

The data suggests that measurement of PCV by either continuous monitoring or by a blood gas analyser is not an accurate alternative to an established laboratory method. The microcentrifuge is the most accurate method of the ones investigated to measure haematocrit during CPB.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Edie RN, Haubert SM, Malm JR. The use

of haemodilution and a non-haemic prime for cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Ionescu MI ed. Techniques in extracorporeal circulation, second edition. London: Butterworths, 1981: 179-98.

Messmer K. , Kreimeier U. , Intaglietta M. Present state of intentional haemodilution. Eur Surg Res 1986; 18: 254-63.

Sunder-Plasman L. , Klovekorn WP , Holper K. , Hase U. , Messmer K. The physiological significance of acutely induced haemodilution. Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Microcirculation , Aalborg, 1970. Basel : Karger, 1971: 23-28.

Kawashima Y. , Yamamoto Z. , Manabe H. Safe limits of haemodilution in cardiopulmonary bypass. Surgery 1974; 76: 391-97.

Dutcher T. Hematology procedures. In: Jones RJ, Palulonis RM eds. American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs: laboratory tests in medical practice. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1980.

International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology. Protocol for evaluation of automated blood cell counters. Clin Lab Haematol 1984; 6: 69-84.

Altman DG , Bland JM Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;32:307-17.

Dodd RY The risk of transfusion transmitted infection. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 419.

10.

Murphy PJ , Connery C. , Hicks GL et al. Homologous blood transfusion as a risk factor of postoperative infection after coronary artery bypass graft operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104: 1092.

11.

Bland JM , Altman DG Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307-10.

12.

La Mantia KR , O'Connor T. , Barash PG Comparing methods of measurement: an alternative approach [Editorial]. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 781-83.

13.

Wong DH , Tremper KK , Stemmer EA et al. Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 784-92.