Vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) has been proposed as a better alternative option than conventional gravitational venous drainage (GVD) in cardiac surgery. However, the literature reports conflicting results between both methods in terms of post-cardiac surgery complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes between VAVD and GVD in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for any randomized control trials or cohort studies that compared clinical outcomes between VAVD and GVD in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Results
Sixteen studies with 8426 patients were included in our study. The pooled effect estimate of the postoperative results showed a statistically significant association between VAVD and decreased blood loss/chest tube drainage (MD = −88.7, 95% CI = −154.71 to −22.69, p-value = 0.008), amount of packed red blood cells (pRBC) transfusion (MD = −0.25, 95% CI = −0.27 to −0.22, p < 0.00,001), re-exploration (RR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.35 to 1, p = 0.05), and re-operation (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.99, p-value = 0.05). However, our study revealed no significant difference between both groups in terms of postoperative mortality, hospital/ICU stay, other blood product transfusions, change of free hemoglobin at 24 h, and other clinical outcomes.
Conclusion
Our study revealed that VAVD is at least equivalent and may provide some benefits compared to GVD in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. While, VAVD requires specific expertise and training in order to optimize its outcomes, its ability to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion, support its use as a valuable alternative for GVD in high-risk groups.
ŠušakSRedžekARosićM, et al.Development of cardiopulmonary bypass – a historical review. Srp Arh Celok Lek2016; 144(11–12): 670–675.
4.
NegishiKBorowskiAGPopovićZB, et al.Effect of gravitational gradients on cardiac filling and performance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2017; 30(12): 1180–1188.
5.
LattimerCRKalodikiEMendozaE. Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins. Phlebology2016; 31(8): 546–553.
6.
CornoAF. Systemic venous drainage: can we help newton?Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg2007; 31(6): 1044–1051.
7.
WangSUndarA. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage and gaseous microemboli in cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol2008; 40(4): 249–256.
8.
PappalardoFCornoCFrancoA, et al.Reduction of hemodilution in small adults undergoing open heart surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. Perfusion2007; 22(5): 317–322.
9.
NassoGCostantiniCPetraliaA, et al.A new extracorporeal vacuum-assisted device to optimize cardiopulmonary bypass. Comparison with the conventional system. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2011; 12(4): 591–595.
10.
MurakamiFUsuiAHirouraM, et al.Clinical study of totally roller pumpless cardiopulmonary bypass system. Artif Organs1997; 21(7): 803–807.
11.
MuraiNChoMOkadaS, et al.Venous drainage method for cardiopulmonary bypass in single-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery: siphon and vacuum-assisted drainage. J Artif Organs2005; 8(2): 91–94.
12.
MarcheixBCarrierMMartelC, et al.Effect of pericardial blood processing on postoperative inflammation and the complement pathways. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 85(2): 530–535.
13.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 372: n71.
HayashiYKagisakiKYamaguchiT, et al.Clinical application of vacuum-assisted cardiopulmonary bypass with a pressure relief valve. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg2001; 20(3): 621–626.
16.
GoksedefDOmerogluSBalkanayO, et al.Hemolysis at different vacuum levels during vacuum-assisted venous drainage: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012; 60(04): 262–268.
17.
CarrierMCyrAVoisineP, et al.Vacuum-assisted venous drainage does not increase the neurological risk. Heart Surg Forum2002; 5(3): 285–288.
18.
BevilacquaSMatteucciSFerrariniM, et al.Biochemical evaluation of vacuum-assisted venous drainage: a randomized, prospective study. Perfusion2002; 17(1): 57–61.
AriyaratnamPBennettRTMcLeanLA, et al.Antegrade rapid prime displacement in elective coronary artery surgery is associated with lower perioperative blood transfusions and a shorter hospital stay. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2013; 17(3): 485–491.
21.
PengRShiHBaJ, et al.Single femoral venous drainage versus both vena cava drainage in isolated repeat tricuspid valve surgery. Int Heart J2018; 59(3): 518–522.
22.
AydinSCekmeceliogluDCelikS, et al.The effect of vacuum-assisted venous drainage on hemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass. Am J Cardiovasc Dis2020; 10(4): 473–478.
23.
GaoSLiYDiaoX, et al.Vacuum-assisted venous drainage in adult cardiac surgery: a propensity-matched study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2019; 30(2): ivz253.
24.
WangLZhangLJLiuJ, et al.Insight into kidney protection by vacuum-assisted venous drainage in adult cardiac operation ― A multicenter study. Circ J2023; 87(4): 551–559.
25.
SilvanoRMalvindiPGMazzoccaF, et al.Vacuum assisted and gravitational venous drainage in aortic valve surgery: a propensity-match study. Perfusion2025; 40(1): 221–228.
26.
AkhrassRBakaeenFGAkrasZ, et al.Primary isolated CABG restrictive blood transfusion protocol reduces transfusions and length of stay. J Card Surg2020; 35(10): 2506–2511.
27.
OzolinaAStrikeEHarlamovsV, et al.Excessive bleeding after cardiac surgery in adults: reasons and management. Acta Chir Latv2010; 9(1): 86–91.
28.
MahrousMA. Risk factors assessment for postoperative bleeding in pediatric cardiac surgery. ALEXMED ePosters2021; 3(4): 68–69.
29.
AveryPMortonSTuckerH, et al.Whole blood transfusion versus component therapy in adult trauma patients with acute major haemorrhage. Emerg Med J2020; 37(6): 370–378.
30.
GarraudOChiaroniJ. An overview of red blood cell and platelet alloimmunisation in transfusion. Transfus Clin Biol2022; 29(4): 297–306.
31.
TernströmLRadulovicVKarlssonM, et al.Plasma activity of individual coagulation factors, hemodilution and blood loss after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. Thromb Res2010; 126(2): e128–e133.
32.
Carvalho FilhoEMarsonFACostaL, et al.Vacuum-assisted drainage in cardiopulmonary bypass: advantages and disadvantages. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc2014; 29(2): 266–271.
33.
LouSJiBLiuJ, et al.Generation, detection and prevention of gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass procedure. Int J Artif Organs2011; 34(11): 1039–1051.
34.
GlazebrookJAnnichG. The march of the normoxics: hyperoxemia and hemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med2022; 23(2): 146–148.
35.
KiyamaHImazekiTKatayamaY, et al.Vacuum-assisted venous drainage in single-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Artif Organs2003; 6(1): 20–24.
36.
DavilaRMRawlesTMackMJ. Venoarterial air embolus: a complication of vacuum-assisted venous drainage. Ann Thorac Surg2001; 71(4): 1369–1371.
37.
ColangeloNTorraccaLLapennaE, et al.Vacuum-assisted venous drainage in extrathoracic cardiopulmonary bypass management during minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Perfusion2006; 21(6): 361–365.
38.
JeggerDTevaearaiHTMuellerXM, et al.Limitations using the vacuum-assist venous drainage technique during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. J Extra Corpor Technol2003; 35(3): 207–211.
39.
PaganoDMilojevicMMeestersMI, et al.2017 EACTS/EACTA guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg2018; 53(1): 79–111.
40.
FerrarisVABrownJRSociety of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force, et al.. 2011 update to the society of thoracic surgeons and the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg2011; 91(3): 944–982.
41.
GambinoRSearlesBDarlingEM. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage: a 2014 safety survey. J Extra Corpor Technol2015; 47(3): 160–166.
42.
DurandyY. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage, angel or demon: PRO?J Extra Corpor Technol2013; 45(2): 122–127.
43.
De SomerF. Venous drainage--gravity or assisted?Perfusion2011; 26(Suppl 1): 15–19.
44.
WahbaAKunstGDe SomerF, et al.2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2025; 40(2): ivaf002.
