Mobility and rehabilitation for patients supported on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) are high-risk and resource-intensive endeavors that currently lack a standardized framework to guide comprehensive program development. This paper introduces the framework to serve as a structured model that integrates best practice recommendations, relevant literature, and practical data from an ELSO Gold Level Center of Excellence program.
Methods
Initially developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the ECMO mobility program matured into a proactive and sustainable system through multidisciplinary collaboration, incorporation of current evidence, and iterative reflective practice. The resulting framework offers a structured, holistic approach to establishing effective ECLS mobility program.
Results
The Mobility Under the Support of ECLS (“MUSECLS”) framework comprised five interconnected domains, beginning with patient and family engagement and extending to institutional values and infrastructure. Implementation strategies and programmatic data from the originating ECMO center are used to illustrate practical application of the framework.
Conclusions
The MUSECLS framework provides a scalable and adaptable model to support the development or refinement of ECMO mobility and rehabilitation programs. It allows centers to tailor practices to local resources and populations while ensuring a comprehensive, evidence-informed approach. The framework is designed to remain applicable as clinical care and research in ECLS continue to advance.
DharAVMorrisonTBarbaroRP, et al.Starting and sustaining an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program. ASAIO J2023; 69(1): 11–22.
2.
HodgsonCLHigginsAMBaileyMJ, et al.Incidence of death or disability at 6 months after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Australia: a prospective, multicentre, registry-embedded cohort study. Lancet Respir Med2022; 10(11): 1038–1048.
3.
TiedebohlJMDeFabioMEBellT, et al.ECMO survivors’ quality of life and needs after discharge: a descriptive, comparative cross-sectional pilot study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs2020; 59: 102829.
4.
MayerKPPastvaAMDuG, et al.Mobility levels with physical rehabilitation delivered during and after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a marker of illness severity or an indication of recovery?Phys Ther2022; 102(3): pzab301.
5.
RottmannFANoeCBemtgenX, et al.Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med2023; 10: 1271540.
6.
CucchiMMarianiSDe PieroME, et al.Awake extracorporeal life support and physiotherapy in adult patients: a systematic review of the literature. Perfusion2023; 38(5): 939–958.
7.
RamseySShehattaALRamanathanK, et al.Extracorporeal life support organization 2024 guideline for early rehabilitation or mobilization of adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J2025; 71(3): 187–199.
8.
PolastriMEdenALoforteA, et al.Physiotherapy for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: how, when, and who. An international EuroELSO survey. Perfusion2024; 39(1): 162–173.
9.
MarhongJDDeBackerJViau-LapointeJ, et al.Sedation and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure: an international survey. Crit Care Med2017; 45(11): 1893–1899.
10.
RiveraJDFoxESFernandoSM, et al.Physical rehabilitation and mobilization in patients receiving extracorporeal life support: a systematic review. Crit Care Explor2024; 6(6): e1095.
11.
PolastriMSwolJLoforteA, et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19: a scoping review. Artif Organs2022; 46(1): 30–39.
12.
DeanELomiC. A health and lifestyle framework: an evidence-informed basis for contemporary physical therapist clinical practice guidelines with special reference to individuals with heart failure. Physiother Res Int2022; 27(3): e1950.
13.
PunBTBalasMCBarnes-DalyMA, et al.Caring for critically ill patients with the ABCDEF bundle: results of the ICU liberation collaborative in over 15,000 adults. Crit Care Med2019; 47(1): 3–14.
14.
BarrJDownsBFerrellK, et al.Improving outcomes in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients following implementation of the ICU liberation (ABCDEF) bundle across a large healthcare system. Crit Care Explor2024; 6(1): e1001.
15.
Barnes‐DalyMAPunBTHarmonLA, et al.Improving health care for critically ill patients using an evidence-based collaborative approach to ABCDEF bundle dissemination and implementation. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs2018; 15(3): 206–216.
16.
OrlandoJJoshiACarterM, et al.Parallel-group randomized study on the impact of a modified TeamSTEPPS training on resident and nurse attitudes toward teamwork and their adherence to patient safety protocols. Int J Acad Med2016; 2(2): 145.
17.
BrockDAbu-RishEChiuCR, et al.Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf2013; 22(5): 414–423.
18.
WillisTSYipTBrownK, et al.Improved teamwork and implementation of clinical pathways in a congenital heart surgery program. Pediatr Qual Saf2019; 4(1): e126.
19.
ShiYMiaoSFuY, et al.TeamSTEPPS improves patient safety. BMJ Open Qual2024; 13(2): e002669.
20.
QuinnLRileyNTyrellCM, et al.A framework for movement analysis of tasks: recommendations from the academy of neurologic physical therapy’s movement system task force. Phys Ther2021; 101(9): pzab154.
21.
deBoerHAndrewsMCuddS, et al.Where and how does physical therapy fit? Integrating physical therapy into interprofessional HIV care. Disabil Rehabil2019; 41(15): 1768–1777.
22.
PeirceSTaylorMPollokT, et al.A physiotherapy framework to managing long COVID: a clinical approach. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J2025; 36(1): 19–29.
MooreCLKaplanSL. A framework and resources for shared decision making: opportunities for improved physical therapy outcomes. Phys Ther2018; 98(12): 1022–1036.
25.
BattAWilliamsBRichJ, et al.A six-step model for developing competency frameworks in the healthcare professions. Front Med2021; 8: 789828.
26.
TovinMM. Competency-based education: a framework for physical therapist education across the continuum. Phys Ther2022; 102(5): pzac044.
27.
IjntemaRFBartenDJDuitsHB, et al.A health care value framework for physical therapy primary health care organizations. Qual Manag Health Care2021; 30(1): 27–35.
28.
HayesKHodgsonCLWebbMJ, et al.Rehabilitation of adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a scoping review. Aust Crit Care2022; 35(5): 575–582.
29.
CornerEJMurrayEJBrettSJ. Qualitative, grounded theory exploration of patients’ experience of early mobilisation, rehabilitation and recovery after critical illness. BMJ Open2019; 9(2): e026348.
30.
JanerkaCLeslieGDGillFJ. Development of patient-centred care in acute hospital settings: a meta-narrative review. Int J Nurs Stud2023; 140: 104465.
31.
CarruthersHDerryDAstinF. Becoming partners in rehabilitation with patients in intensive care: physiotherapists’ perspectives. Disabil Rehabil2024; 46(18): 4194–4204.
32.
SecundaKEKruserJM. Patient-centered and family-centered care in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med2022; 43(3): 539–550.
33.
BrauneSBojesPMecklenburgA, et al.Feasibility, safety, and resource utilisation of active mobilisation of patients on extracorporeal life support: a prospective observational study. Ann Intensive Care2020; 10(1): 161.
34.
AbramsDGaranARBrodieD. Awake and fully mobile patients on cardiac extracorporeal life support. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2019; 8(1): 44–53.
35.
TonnaJEBaileyMAbramsD, et al.Predictors of early mobilization in patients requiring VV ECMO for greater than 7 days: an international cohort study. Heart Lung2023; 62: 57–63.
36.
PasrijaCMackowickKMRaithelM, et al.Ambulation with femoral arterial cannulation can be safely performed on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 107(5): 1389–1394.
37.
JavidfarJ. The challenges faced with early mobilization of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med2018; 46(1): 161–163.
38.
BullTCorleyALyeI, et al.Cannula and circuit management in peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an international survey of 45 countries. PLoS One2019; 14(12): e0227248.
39.
KeshavamurthySBazanVTribbleTA, et al.Ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2021; 37(S3): 366–379.
40.
SalnaMAbramsDBrodieD. Physical rehabilitation in the awake patient receiving extracorporeal circulatory or gas exchange support. Ann Transl Med2020; 8(13): 834.
41.
SorokinVMacLarenGVidanapathiranaPC, et al.Choosing the appropriate configuration and cannulation strategies for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the potential dynamic process of organ support and importance of hybrid modes. Eur J Heart Fail2017; 19(S2): 75–83.
42.
GeyerMGohrbandtBSagoschenI, et al.Pitfalls of cannulation for extracorporeal life support: review of the literature and illustrative case presentation. J Artif Organs2018; 21(1): 8–16.
43.
NoeCRottmannFABemtgenX, et al.Dual lumen cannulation and mobilization of patients with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs2023; 47(10): 1654–1662.
44.
WellsCLForresterJVogelJ, et al.Safety and feasibility of early physical therapy for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenator: University of Maryland medical center experience. Crit Care Med2018; 46(1): 53–59.
45.
UsmanAASpeldeAELutfiW, et al.Percutaneous venopulmonary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as Bridge to lung transplantation. ASAIO J2024; 70(9): 758–766.
46.
HessNRHickeyGWMurrayHN, et al.Ambulatory simultaneous venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist device bridge to heart transplantation. JTCVS Tech2022; 13: 131–134.
47.
GeorgeTJSheasbyJTaylorJE, et al.Early mobilization in coronavirus‐19 patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Card Surg2022; 37(12): 4536–4542.
48.
LeeSH. Awakening in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation. Acute Crit Care2022; 37(1): 26–34.
49.
DevlinJWSkrobikYGélinasC, et al.Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med2018; 46(9): e825–e873.
50.
HodgsonCLSchallerSJNydahlP, et al.Ten strategies to optimize early mobilization and rehabilitation in intensive care. Crit Care2021; 25(1): 324.
51.
NeedhamDMKorupoluRZanniJM, et al.Early physical medicine and rehabilitation for patients with acute respiratory failure: a quality improvement project. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2010; 91(4): 536–542.
52.
HayesKHollandAEPellegrinoVA, et al.Acute skeletal muscle wasting and relation to physical function in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). J Crit Care2018; 48: 1–8.
53.
KourekCNanasSKotanidouA, et al.Modalities of exercise training in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis2022; 9(2): 34.
54.
CerierEManerikarAKandulaV, et al.Early initiation of physical and occupational therapy while on extracorporeal life support improves patients’ functional activity. Artif Organs2023; 47(5): 870–881.
55.
TrivediJREndoTSharmaA, et al.Ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in patients listed for lung transplant. ASAIO J2024; 70(7): 625–632.
56.
MunshiLKobayashiTDeBackerJ, et al.Intensive care physiotherapy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Am Thorac Soc2017; 14(2): 246–253.
57.
SheasbyJKraisSDoM, et al.An interprofessional approach to mobilizing patients with COVID-19 receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. AACN Adv Crit Care2022; 33(3): 262–273.
58.
ObrejaVMarcarianTMillerPS. Ambulation protocol for adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a quality improvement initiative. Crit Care Nurse2025 1; 45(1): 52–60.
59.
EdenAPurkissCCorkG, et al.In-patient physiotherapy for adults on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation – united Kingdom ECMO physiotherapy network: a consensus agreement for best practice. J Intensive Care Soc2017; 18(3): 212–220.
60.
HajiJYMehraSDoraiswamyP. Awake ECMO and mobilizing patients on ECMO. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2021; 37(S2): 309–318.
61.
PatrickKAdamsA. Mobilization of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before lung transplant. Crit Care Nurse2021; 41(4): 39–45.
62.
KoYChoYHParkYH, et al.Feasibility and safety of early physical therapy and active mobilization for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J2015; 61(5): 564–568.
63.
KargelaMSiglerJ. Physiotherapeutic guidelines for initiating and terminating early mobility for patients on extracorporeal membrane support: a scoping review. J Acute Care Phys Ther2025; 16(1): 21–33.
64.
RickelmannCKnoblauchDJ. Incorporating safe patient-handling techniques to mobilize our Most complex patients on extra corporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Nurs Q2018; 41(3): 272–281.
65.
ParrySMNydahlPNeedhamDM. Implementing early physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the ICU: institutional, clinician, and patient considerations. Intensive Care Med2018; 44(4): 470–473.
66.
LinkeCAChapmanLBBergerLJ, et al.Early mobilization in the ICU: a collaborative, integrated approach. Crit Care Explor2020; 2(4): e0090.
67.
MotLSPtJHBirstJ, et al.The role of occupational therapy in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with coronavirus disease: a pilot case series. Journal of Acute Care Occupational Therapy2022; 4(1): 1–27.
68.
LikarRAroyoIBangertK, et al.Management of swallowing disorders in ICU patients - a multinational expert opinion. J Crit Care2024; 79: 154447.
69.
OwenGSVarelasEAMarkME, et al.Dysphagia in COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Dysphagia2024; 39(6): 1183–1192.
70.
Dallal-YorkJSegalewitzTCroftK, et al.Incidence, risk factors, and sequelae of dysphagia mediated aspiration following lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant2022; 41(8): 1095–1103.
71.
MatarNSmailyHCherfaneP, et al.Profiling of oropharyngeal dysphagia in an acute care hospital setting. Ear Nose Throat J2021; 100(8): NP357–NP361.
72.
PelekhatySGesslerJDanteS, et al.Nutrition and outcomes in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an observational cohort study. Nutr Clin Pract2025; 40(1): 117–124.
73.
DresenENaidooOHillA, et al.Medical nutrition therapy in patients receiving ECMO: evidence‐based guidance for clinical practice. J Parenter Enter Nutr2023; 47(2): 220–235.
74.
DavisRCDurhamLAKiralyL, et al.Safety, tolerability, and outcomes of enteral nutrition in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nutr Clin Pract2021; 36(1): 98–104.
75.
ParkJHeoESongIA, et al.Nutritional support and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients supported with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Nutr2020; 39(8): 2617–2623.
76.
OhbeHJoTYamanaH, et al.Early enteral nutrition for cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide inpatient database study. Intensive Care Med2018; 44(8): 1258–1265.
77.
FernandoSMScottMTalaricoR, et al.Association of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with new mental health diagnoses in adult survivors of critical illness. JAMA2022; 328(18): 1827–1836.
78.
McClurePTevaldMZarzyckiR, et al.The 4-Element movement system model to guide physical therapist education, practice, and movement-related research. Phys Ther2021; 101(3): pzab024.
79.
PastvaAKirkTParrySM. Functional electrical stimulation cycling Pre- and post-bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation: a case report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2015; 191: A1643.
80.
RussoMJJeevanandamVStepneyJ, et al.Intra-aortic balloon pump inserted through the subclavian artery: a minimally invasive approach to mechanical support in the ambulatory end-stage heart failure patient. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012; 144(4): 951–955.
81.
RamseySCLucasJBarrettP, et al.Safe ambulation of critically ill cardiac patients with femoral balloon pumps: a case cohort study. J Card Fail2020; 26(7): 621–625.
82.
ChenSLesterLPiperGL, et al.Safety and feasibility of an early mobilization protocol for patients with femoral intra-aortic balloon pumps as bridge to heart transplant. ASAIO J2022; 68(5): 714–720.
83.
BolingBDennisDRTribbleTA, et al.Safety of nurse-led ambulation for patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Prog Transplant2016; 26(2): 112–116.
84.
RamseySPurringtonBSlayD. Intubated. Cannulated. Ambulated: management of complex patients on ECMO. In: Education session presented at: Combined Sections Meeting 2025 Feb 14.
NtoumenopoulosGPizimolasGManiS, et al.Lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy and respiratory therapy practices: current status and future directions. POCUS2024; 9(2): 9–11.
87.
MollVTeoEYLGrendaDS, et al.Rapid development and implementation of an ECMO program. ASAIO J2016; 62(3): 354–358.
88.
Jones-AkhtarekhavariJTribbleTAZwischenbergerJB. Developing an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program. Crit Care Clin2017; 33(4): 767–775.
89.
ZhuYBankarDShudoY, et al.Multidisciplinary approach utilizing early, intensive physical rehabilitation to accelerate recovery from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg2019; 56(4): 811–812.
90.
ParkerAMAkhlaghiNMalikAM, et al.Perceived barriers to early goal-directed mobility in the intensive care unit: results of a quality improvement evaluation. Aust Crit Care2022; 35(3): 219–224.
91.
HoldsworthCHainesKJFrancisJJ, et al.Mobilization of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: an elicitation study using the theory of planned behavior. J Crit Care2015; 30(6): 1243–1250.
92.
JohnsonKPettiJOlsonA, et al.Identifying barriers to early mobilisation among mechanically ventilated patients in a trauma intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs2017; 42: 51–54.
93.
RoseL. Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?Nurs Crit Care2011; 16(1): 5–10.
94.
MørkAKruppAHankwitzJ, et al.Using kotter’s change framework to implement and sustain multiple complementary ICU initiatives. J Nurs Care Qual2018; 33(1): 38–45.
95.
RahimiRASkrzatJReddyDRS, et al.Physical rehabilitation of patients in the intensive care unit requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a small case series. Phys Ther2013; 93(2): 248–255.
96.
JingYYuanZZhouW, et al.A phased intervention bundle to decrease the mortality of patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in intensive care unit. Front Med2022; 9(9): 1005162.
97.
BonizzoliMLazzeriCDragoA, et al.Effects of a physiotherapeutic program in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an 8-year single-center experience. Minerva Anestesiol2019; 85(9): 989–994.
98.
GlasgowREHardenSMGaglioB, et al.RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-Year review. Front Public Health2019; 7: 64.
99.
HoltropJSEstabrooksPAGaglioB, et al.Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: clarifications and resources. J Clin Transl Sci2021; 5(1): e126.
100.
FriedmanCP. What is unique about learning health systems?Learn Health Syst2022; 6(3): e10328.
101.
GursesAPMurphyDJMartinezEA, et al.A practical tool to identify and eliminate barriers to compliance with evidence-based guidelines. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2009; 35(10): 526–585.
102.
DusinJMelansonAMische-LawsonL. Evidence-based practice models and frameworks in the healthcare setting: a scoping review. BMJ Open2023; 13(5): e071188.
103.
DaliaAAOrtolevaJFiedlerA, et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a team sport: institutional survival benefits of a formalized ECMO team. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2019; 33(4): 902–907.
104.
CotzaMCarboniGBallottaA, et al.Modern ECMO: why an ECMO programme in a tertiary care hospital. Eur Heart J Suppl2016; 18(suppl E): E79–E85.
105.
LangJKHainesKJHodgsonCL. Development of a performance standard for physiotherapists delivering exercise and mobilisation to the critically ill: a modified Delphi consensus study. Aust Crit Care2023; 36(4): 470–476.
PermeCSDamascenoMSChandrashekarR, et al.Perme ICU physical therapy competency: development of an ICU knowledge and skills assessment tool. Intensive Crit Care Nurs2024; 85: 103750.
