AnastasiadisKAntonitsisPDeliopoulosA, et al.Perfusion matters, and it will always matter in cardiac surgery. Perfusion2021; 36: 677–678.
2.
AnastasiadisKAntonitsisPMurkinJ, et al.2021 MiECTiS focused update on the 2016 position paper for the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery. Perfusion2023; 38: 1360–1383.
3.
WahbaAMilojevicMBoerCEACTS/EACTA/EBCP Committee Reviewers, et al.2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg2020; 57: 210–251.
4.
LikoskyDSBakerRANewlandRFInternational Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion, the PERForm Registry, the Australian and New Zealand Collaborative Perfusion Registry (ANZCPR), and the Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative, et al.Is conventional bypass for coronary artery bypass graft surgery a misnomer?J Extra Corpor Technol2018; 50: 225–230.
5.
AngeliniGDReevesBCCullifordLA, et al. Conventional versus minimally invasive extra-corporeal circulation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial (COMICS). Perfusion. 2024. doi:10.1177/02676591241258054, Epub ahead of print 4 Jun 2024.
6.
AnastasiadisKAntonitsisPPapazisisG, et al. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (MiECS): rationale and design of a multicentre randomised trial. Perfusion. 2024. doi:10.1177/02676591241272009, Epub ahead of print 1 Aug 2024.
